search for: livingston

...anks, David. I'd be happy to add the bindings .. is there a general way we add them? Or do you just scrub the API and make sensible judgements to the API? On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:55 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I was wondering if there is someone already working on putting the new >> OrcJIT APIs in the LLVM-C bindings? >> >> Also, is there a general consensus to also add C bindings when new major >&g...

...he textual IR changes? On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Jeremy Lakeman <Jeremy.Lakeman at gmail.com> wrote: > Assembly syntax can and will break between versions. But bitcode should > generally be upgradeable, or a bug should be filed. > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Is it safe to assume that LLVM IR will live more-or-less the same for >> most releases, and that significant changes will be communicated? >> >> Or is it something that can change at any time and you must not rely on &gt...

...ontains Y, not X. This relationship has some physical justification. I assume that these two approaches are not equivalent, is this correct? I assume the Box Cox approach (profile likelihood) is better, is this correct and why? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Paul. Paul Livingstone Statistical Analyst AeroStructures® Level 14, 222 Kings Way South Melbourne, Vic, 3205 Phone: 03 9694 1083 Mobile: 0418 121 530 Fax: 03 9696 8195 Email: paul.livingstone@aerostructures.com.au Web: www.aerostructures.com.au [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...could be done easily using just the keyboard, with up-arrow, shift-end or shift-home, ctrl-c, etc. But in R, the shift key doesn't select text. The only way I can select text in R is with the mouse. Does anyone know how to select text in R using only the keyboard? Many thanks, Paul. Paul Livingstone Statistical Analyst AeroStructures? Level 14, 222 Kingsway South Melbourne, Vic, 3205 Phone: 03 9694 1083 Mobile: 0418 121 530 Fax: 03 9696 8195 Email: paul.livingstone at aerostructures.com.au Web: www.aerostructures.com.au

Hi all, I have this code: new Ajax.Request(''non_existant.file'', { onSuccess:function(){alert("yay");}, onFailure:function(){alert("boo");} }); Why does the onFailure alert never get called? It works fine if I use a real file (onSuccess gets called). Thanks, Douglas

This is also happening when using the C++ APIs. It looks like an MCJIT and SetGC interaction. I'm lost on how to proceed further. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > The erlang was a typo, I was trying things out. > > I've updated the bug with a C program, which exhibits the problem. > > To answer your question, given the IR you generated llc/opt does not > complain. > > On Tue, Mar 31, 201...

...i32 (i32)* > > > ; Function Attrs: nounwind ssp uwtable > > define i32 @test(i32 %val) #0 { > > %1 = load i32 (i32)** @f, align 8, !tbaa !1 > > %2 = tail call i32 %1(i32 %val) #1 > > ret i32 %2 > > } > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com > > wrote: > >> I'm having a problem of being unable to call into an arbitrary function >> that is loaded into memory whose pointer address is known to me but was not >> linked into LLVM. >> >> I have added the function and ca...

...erywhere, as it lets the register allocator spill it under high > register pressure. > > GCC has support for allocating globals in GPRs and removing that GPR from > the allocatable set, but LLVM doesn't implement it so far as I know. > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I was wondering if global variables can be candidates for register >> allocation. My use case is a global variable that is used in every >> function in my program. >> >> I'm wondering if it's better to p...

...a certain range of illegal instructions, which generated exceptions when used, and the (highly optimized) exception handlers would recover from the exception by dispatching to an OS routine determined by the specific bits in the illegal instruction. > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 9:07 PM Hayden Livingston via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I'm on a mission to generate code that can be loaded from disk without >> any modifications. This means no relocations can occur. >> >> Trying to see if this can be done for C++ code that uses STL but has...

I will build LLVM locally, debug and report back. On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > I've just started using the llvm-pdbutil tool. Great job on the general tool. > > But I'm having trouble figuring out how the output of the dump tool > relates to real addresses in memory or for that matter relative > virtual address...

Hello, I was wondering if there is someone already working on putting the new OrcJIT APIs in the LLVM-C bindings? Also, is there a general consensus to also add C bindings when new major features are added? Hayden -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150201/061f5949/attachment.html>

On Mon, 21 May 2018, Hayden Livingston wrote: > So are you saying that LLVM can be built as ARM64 on Windows now? > CMake doesn't show me an option for ARM64 when using MSVC on Windows. > I have the latest CMake. I'm saying that LLVM can produce code for the Windows/ARM64 target. As for compiling LLVM itself to run o...

I'm on a mission to generate code that can be loaded from disk without any modifications. This means no relocations can occur. Trying to see if this can be done for C++ code that uses STL but has no global variables, and a single function, but of course Clang will generate more functions for STL code. I want to provide an array of function pointers so that for all interactions STL needs to

...ilog records (it instead infers them from the structure of the assembly itself, and requires that LLVM only generate function returns using a particular finite set of instructions), so that has to be handled elsewhere during machine code selection/emission. On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:07 AM Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: > Julia is a language, and you can use their code. > > Jameson Nash, could you please let us know why Julia's code has hard > coded values for the unwinding? Is your prolog/epilog some standard > one? > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:47...

I've just started using the llvm-pdbutil tool. Great job on the general tool. But I'm having trouble figuring out how the output of the dump tool relates to real addresses in memory or for that matter relative virtual address either. Here's the logic I tried (which doesn't work): (1) Get Instruction Pointer of interest (2) Subtract the base address of the dll that address

Can we also codify when something should be added to the C API? For a lot of folks the C API is the only usable interface. I am one of them. We are not as vocally represented because don't generally give back to the community, usually because we are just consumers of this library. (Or maybe I'm totally wrong and lots of us give back). For example, ORC APIs in C the bindings. On Fri, Jul

...tside this TU can see this variable" can help with #1 as > well, as the compiler can then analyze this TU and see what is going on > without having to worry that calls outside the TU will modify the variable > unknown to its current knowledge. > > On 1 July 2015 at 05:57, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks, Reid. I'm not an optimization expert, but as a workaround, >> can I do the following: >> >> void myFunction() >> { >> int local = global; >> .. use local ... >> } >> >&gt...

...sted a C API for ORC. I don't think ORC's ready for a > stable C API, but I'm not opposed to providing C bindings that will probably > be reasonably stable in practice (though with no guarantees). I've actually > already knocked up some trivial prototype bindings for Hayden Livingston > that could serve as a base (see attached). > > The next question is where unstable bindings should live. Juergen, Eric, > anyone else who wants to weigh in: I looked back over the C API thread, but > I don't think we settled on a home for this kind of thing. Any thoughts? I &gt...

I see it's been in the wishlist a while. Any possible timeframe for getting it working, or maybe a patch (or is it too big a change) to support it? I'm building a new server to move an existing userbase to. So far I have working: Postfix (with Maildir quota patches that work fine) Amavis-new with ClamAV scanning for viruses (will add SpamAssassin soon) SquirrelMail IMP (Horde)

...ot run. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > Most likely a mistake in one of my recent patches. Can you file a bug > with a test case? I'll try to get this fixed quickly. > > Philip > > On 03/31/2015 01:42 AM, Hayden Livingston wrote: > > I'm getting an error while using a trivial example by just setting a > function's gc to shadow-stack. > > Does anybody know why this could be happening? > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing listLLVMdev at cs.u...