Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "lists1".
Did you mean:
lists
2006 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing (TAKE TWO)
...L: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1
> TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists
> TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists
> TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchma...
2006 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
...ut-C++/hash
TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash
TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello
TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello
TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello
TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1
TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1
TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1
TEST-FAIL: llc /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists
TEST-FAIL: jit /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists
TEST-FAIL: cbe /SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists
TE...
2006 Nov 14
5
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
LLVMers,
The LLVM 1.9 Prerelease is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.9/
If anyone can spare some time, please download the appropriate tarballs
for your platform and test the release (at least with make check). I'd
also appreciate any documentation reviews.
Please note that llvm-gcc3 on x86 may not have a clean dejagnu run. You
should see one XPASS for
2009 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] cfarm-x86-64 x86_64 nightly tester results
...: 5.10% (4780 => 4536)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash: -175.14% (3636 => 10004)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hash2: -217.73% (3812 => 12112)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists: -47.33% (4420 => 6512)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1: -40.03% (5396 => 7556)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/moments: -14.37% (7880 => 9012)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile: 7.33% (10640 => 9860)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck: 5.53% (16196 => 15300)
> singlesource/Benchmarks/Sh...
2014 Aug 12
4
[LLVMdev] Explicit template instantiations in libc++
Most of libc++ doesn't have explicit template instantiations, which
leads to a pretty significant build time and code size cost when using
libc++, since a large number of common templates will be emitted by the
compiler and coalesced by the linker. Notably, in include/__config, we
have:
#ifndef _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE
#define _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE(...)
#endif
whereas before
2015 Feb 26
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] AArch64: Should we disable GlobalMerge?
Hi all,
I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on
ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for
AArch64.
As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB
(AArch64, 128B on ARM).
At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost
free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/objinst | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1 | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/fibo | * | * |
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sieve...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists | 0.0923 9296 0.0301 * 0.0312 | 23.83 24.00 23.73 * 21.70 | 0.99 1.00 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1 | 0.1233 11592 0.0425 * 0.0443 | 0.79 0.73 0.76 * 0.79 | 1.08 1.04 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix | 0.0332 5140 0.0198 * 0.0198...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists | 0.0720 7864 0.0560 * 0.0480 | 18.38 20.26 19.98 * 20.52 | 0.91 0.92 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1 | 0.0720 9380 0.0600 * 0.1040 | 0.81 0.92 0.87 * 1.03 | 0.88 0.93 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix | 0.0200 3792 0.0280 * 0.0200...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists | 0.0908 7820 0.0406 * 0.0431 | 31.19 32.37 31.40 * 30.99 | 0.96 0.99 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1 | 0.0978 9260 0.0500 * 0.0481 | 1.22 1.24 1.23 * 1.28 | 0.98 0.99 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix | 0.0294 3736 0.0178 * 0.0195...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists | 0.0673 9048 0.0162 * 0.0323 | 7.78 7.77 7.77 * 8.11 | 1.00 1.00 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1 | 0.0979 11732 0.0244 * 0.0250 | 0.39 0.39 0.39 * 0.43 | 1.00 1.00 n/a n/a
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix | 0.0113 5456 0.0101 * 0.0176...
2018 Apr 26
0
Compare test-suite benchmarks performance complied without TBAA, with default TBAA and with new TBAA struct path
...22| 3919890376| 0|1.758925061| -0.06| 3919890376| 0|
|SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/Shootout-C++-lists.test | 40|2.739061691|29793102996|2.740463212| -0.05|29793102974| 0|2.739521217| -0.02|29793102974| 0|
|SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/Shootout-C++-lists1.test | 201|0.125677348| 1166151573|0.125606508| 0.06| 1166151553| 0|0.125619352| 0.05| 1166151552| 0|
|SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/Shootout-C++-matrix.test | 40|1.160447756|11919784092|0.988233915| 17.43|10389784094| 14.73|0.987882481| 17.47|1...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...| - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists |
> 0.0899 11392 0.0499 * 0.0399 | 5.90 6.00
> 5.86 * 6.10 | 0.98 1.01 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1 |
> 0.1200 16204 0.0799 * 0.1199 | 0.33 0.34
> 0.33 * 0.46 | 0.97 1.00 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix |
> 0.0400 12192 0.0600 * ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/
> lists | 0.0899 11392 0.0499
> * 0.0399 | 5.90 6.00 5.86 *
> 6.10 | 0.98 1.01 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/
> lists1 | 0.1200 16204 0.0799
> * 0.1199 | 0.33 0.34 0.33 *
> 0.46 | 0.97 1.00 n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/
> matrix | 0.0400 12192 0.0600
&g...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability