search for: linux_root_test

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "linux_root_test".

Did you mean: linux_root_tests
2018 Feb 14
1
[PATCH] inspect: use check_tests also for detecting Hurd
...ian_version" ~followsymlinks:true then ( - let distro = DISTRO_DEBIAN in - ignore (parse_generic distro "/etc/debian_version" data) - ); - (* Arch Hurd also exists, but inconveniently it doesn't have - * the normal /etc/arch-release file. XXX - *) + check_tests data linux_root_tests; (* Determine the architecture. *) data.arch <- check_architecture (); -- 2.14.3
2017 Aug 08
1
Re: [PATCH v11 08/10] daemon: Implement inspection of Linux and other Unix-like operating systems.
...root: checking %s\n%!" release_file; > + if Is.is_file ~followsymlinks:true release_file then ( > + if parse_fun release_file data then () (* true => finished *) > + else loop tests > + ) else loop tests > + | [] -> () > + in > + loop linux_root_tests; Would it be possible to move the above loop in an own helper function, so the check_$OS functions of other OSes can have their own counterpart of linux_root_tests? It is true that we don't add new identifications often, but since it's already implemented here... > +and check_fstab_e...
2017 Aug 09
0
[PATCH v12 09/11] daemon: Implement inspection of Linux and other Unix-like operating systems.
...st. + * + * Each parse function should return true or false. If a parse function + * returns true, then we finish, else if it returns false then we continue + * to the next test. + *) +type parse_function = string -> inspection_data -> bool +type tests = (string * parse_function) list + +let linux_root_tests : tests = [ + (* systemd distros include /etc/os-release which is reasonably + * standardized. This entry should be first. + *) + "/etc/os-release", parse_os_release; + (* LSB is also a reasonable standard. This entry should be second. *) + "/etc/lsb-release",...
2017 Jul 31
0
[PATCH v11 08/10] daemon: Implement inspection of Linux and other Unix-like operating systems.
...called. If not, we go on to the next + * test. + * + * Each parse function should return true or false. If a parse function + * returns true, then we finish, else if it returns false then we continue + * to the next test. + *) +type parse_function = string -> inspection_data -> bool + +let linux_root_tests : (string * parse_function) list = [ + (* systemd distros include /etc/os-release which is reasonably + * standardized. This entry should be first. + *) + "/etc/os-release", parse_os_release; + (* LSB is also a reasonable standard. This entry should be second. *) + "/e...
2017 Jul 31
16
[PATCH v11 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.
2017 Jul 21
10
[PATCH v10 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I
2017 Jul 17
12
[PATCH v9 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but
2017 Aug 09
16
[PATCH v12 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid