search for: linux_root_tests

...ian_version" ~followsymlinks:true then ( - let distro = DISTRO_DEBIAN in - ignore (parse_generic distro "/etc/debian_version" data) - ); - (* Arch Hurd also exists, but inconveniently it doesn't have - * the normal /etc/arch-release file. XXX - *) + check_tests data linux_root_tests; (* Determine the architecture. *) data.arch <- check_architecture (); -- 2.14.3

...root: checking %s\n%!" release_file; > + if Is.is_file ~followsymlinks:true release_file then ( > + if parse_fun release_file data then () (* true => finished *) > + else loop tests > + ) else loop tests > + | [] -> () > + in > + loop linux_root_tests; Would it be possible to move the above loop in an own helper function, so the check_$OS functions of other OSes can have their own counterpart of linux_root_tests? It is true that we don't add new identifications often, but since it's already implemented here... > +and check_fstab_en...

...st. + * + * Each parse function should return true or false. If a parse function + * returns true, then we finish, else if it returns false then we continue + * to the next test. + *) +type parse_function = string -> inspection_data -> bool +type tests = (string * parse_function) list + +let linux_root_tests : tests = [ + (* systemd distros include /etc/os-release which is reasonably + * standardized. This entry should be first. + *) + "/etc/os-release", parse_os_release; + (* LSB is also a reasonable standard. This entry should be second. *) + "/etc/lsb-release", p...

...called. If not, we go on to the next + * test. + * + * Each parse function should return true or false. If a parse function + * returns true, then we finish, else if it returns false then we continue + * to the next test. + *) +type parse_function = string -> inspection_data -> bool + +let linux_root_tests : (string * parse_function) list = [ + (* systemd distros include /etc/os-release which is reasonably + * standardized. This entry should be first. + *) + "/etc/os-release", parse_os_release; + (* LSB is also a reasonable standard. This entry should be second. *) + "/et...

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid