search for: linux_on

...have trouble finding rl_resize_terminal >> then you could wrap a macro around that part. > I find python related patches that use > #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL > so they must have configured for that. We could and > probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy > currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd > appreciate others to produce code for that. Actually that was easy (in hindsight.. I took too long!) enough, so I've now committed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r706...

...minal >>>> then you could wrap a macro around that part. > >>> I find python related patches that use > >>> #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL > >>> so they must have configured for that. We could and >>> probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy >>> currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd >>> appreciate others to produce code for that. > >> Actually that was easy (in hindsight.. I took too long!) >> enough, so I've now committed > >> --------------------------------...

...; >>>> I find python related patches that use > >> > >>>> #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL > >> > >>>> so they must have configured for that. We could and > >>>> probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy > >>>> currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd > >>>> appreciate others to produce code for that. > >> > >>> Actually that was easy (in hindsight.. I took too long!) > >>> enough, so I'...

...n related patches that use >>>>> >>>>>>> #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL >>>>> >>>>>>> so they must have configured for that. We could and >>>>>>> probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy >>>>>>> currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd >>>>>>> appreciate others to produce code for that. >>>>> >>>>> Actually that was easy (in hindsight.. I took too long!) >>>>&g...

...g rl_resize_terminal >>> then you could wrap a macro around that part. >> I find python related patches that use >> #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL >> so they must have configured for that. We could and >> probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy >> currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd >> appreciate others to produce code for that. > Actually that was easy (in hindsight.. I took too long!) > enough, so I've now committed > ------------------------------------------...

Readline <= 6.2 shouldn't require the SIGWINCH patch, so if older versions have trouble finding rl_resize_terminal then you could wrap a macro around that part. The isearch C-c bug has existed forever, according to Chet Ramey. Yes, I had to retrain myself to use C-g to exit isearch but it's confusing. It would be nice to fix this C-c bug on older versions too, but my solution used some

...d that part. >> >>>> I find python related patches that use >> >>>> #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL >> >>>> so they must have configured for that. We could and >>>> probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy >>>> currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd >>>> appreciate others to produce code for that. >> >>> Actually that was easy (in hindsight.. I took too long!) >>> enough, so I've now committed &gt...

...; >>>>>> I find python related patches that use >>>> >>>>>> #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL >>>> >>>>>> so they must have configured for that. We could and >>>>>> probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy >>>>>> currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd >>>>>> appreciate others to produce code for that. >>>> >>>>> Actually that was easy (in hindsight.. I took too long!) >>>>> enough, so I've n...

...gt;>>> >> >>>>>>> #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL >> >>>>> >> >>>>>>> so they must have configured for that. We could and >> >>>>>>> probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy >> >>>>>>> currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd >> >>>>>>> appreciate others to produce code for that. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Actually that was easy (in hindsigh...

...CH patch, so > if older versions have trouble finding rl_resize_terminal > then you could wrap a macro around that part. I find python related patches that use #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL so they must have configured for that. We could and probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd appreciate others to produce code for that. > The isearch C-c bug has existed forever, according to Chet Ramey. I see. As your patch seems to only work for readline (>=) 6.3, we have solved part of the problems. If thos...

...e > >>>>> > >>>>>>> #ifdef HAVE_RL_RESIZE_TERMINAL > >>>>> > >>>>>>> so they must have configured for that. We could and > >>>>>>> probably should do the same, but as a Linux_only guy > >>>>>>> currently (even basically only one flavor of Linux), I'd > >>>>>>> appreciate others to produce code for that. > >>>>> > >>>>> Actually that was easy (in hindsight.. I took too long!...