search for: linktimes

Hello all, I'm a research assistant at the University of Wisconsin and we're trying to come up with a general way to run our whole program analysis over programs that may use different methods to perform the build. I saw some discussion that liblto could be used for this (and safecode successfully did it) for llvm 2.6 - 3.0, but that doesn't seem to be working the same way with llvm

(repost the reply using my personal account -- previous reply to the list got hold up) On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Adve, Vikram Sadanand <vadve at illinois.edu> wrote: > Diego, Teresa, David, > > Sorry for my delayed reply; I left for vacation right after sending my message about this. > > Diego, it wasn't explicit from your message whether LLVM LTO can handle

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307 ------- Additional Comments From jmknoble at pobox.com 2002-06-28 04:44 ------- '-ldl' is generally not necessary to build OpenSSH unless you're building against a version of OpenSSL that includes the "engine" for smart cards, etc. (that is, for example, openssl-engine-0.9.6d instead of openssl-0.9.6d). If that's the

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 6:19 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-08-03 8:58 GMT-07:00 Johan Engelen via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > > The error is gone after removing (or reducing) the alignment of `%a`. > This > > makes me believe that our inline asm syntax is correct to add an offset > to a > > pointer: "

> On May 12, 2016, at 11:21 PM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > As we understood great changes will be done in LNT, so we are waiting to new LNT version and stopped our work in LNT. > > One more question about using test-suite separately with cmake. Cmake can only build all tests and generate lit tests. After that we

Hi Matthias, Thank you for your answer. But can you answer for some more questions? First of all, now LNT uses make-style of running tests and parse results from result csv file. Are there any plans to go to cmake? As I understood lit will run and collect all metrics, but there is no opportunity to make any settings for choosing what metrics I would like to collect. Test reports files allow to

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: > On 12/12/14 15:56, Adve, Vikram Sadanand wrote: >> >> I've been asked how LTO in LLVM compares to equivalent capabilities >> in GCC. How do the two compare in terms of scalability? And >> robustness for large applications? > > > Neither GCC nor LLVM can handle our

Hi Elena, > First of all, now LNT uses make-style of running tests and parse results from result csv file. Are there any plans to go to cmake? There are two test drivers in LNT. "lnt runtests nt" uses the old Makefile-based system and "lnt runtests test-suite" uses the new cmake-based system. It sounds like you are using the former and should switch to the latter.

In openSUSE Tumbleweed (and several other distributions as well), packages are build by default with linktime optimization (LTO) enabled. This didn?t work for Dovecot, so until now LTO was disabled for Dovecot. There is a way to make it work though, see the following link: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997513#20 So far a fix has not made it to upstream, the

On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:13 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:49:36AM -0500, Shankar Easwaran wrote: >> Not sure why this is being done for a long time with the GNU linker. > > Because the main program is not PIC, it will only use absolute > references to global symbols. For functions, you can create a PLT > record, but for data access, you have to hide

> On May 25, 2016, at 1:54 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > Thank you for your answer. > But can you answer for some more questions? > First of all, now LNT uses make-style of running tests and parse results from result csv file. Are there any plans to go to cmake? As James already said "lnt runtest

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:49:36AM -0500, Shankar Easwaran wrote: > Not sure why this is being done for a long time with the GNU linker. Because the main program is not PIC, it will only use absolute references to global symbols. For functions, you can create a PLT record, but for data access, you have to hide the real symbol and copy the content over to the equivalent in the main binary.

On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Aristid Breitkreuz wrote: > I am, as said in the subject, new to this list. I have not actually used > LLVM, I tried with an older version but failed. Recently I noticed that > 1.7 came out and looked at the release notes. And there was something > that stroke me: llvm-g++ adheres to the IA64 ABI but _not for > exceptions_. I was not able to find information why

Hello everyone, I am trying to add checkpoints to my IR code. In order to do that I need to add this instruction: call void @m5_checkpoint(i64 0, i64 0) to some of the basic blocks in my benchmark. m5_checkpoint is a function defined for checkpointing in another simulator and is not included in my benchmark source code. So I need to create this instruction and I couldn't figure out how to do

Hello, I am, as said in the subject, new to this list. I have not actually used LLVM, I tried with an older version but failed. Recently I noticed that 1.7 came out and looked at the release notes. And there was something that stroke me: llvm-g++ adheres to the IA64 ABI but _not for exceptions_. I was not able to find information why this is so and why it is necessary, so I hope you don't

Hi all, I stumbled upon either a bug, or we are emitting wrong inline asm code. The testcase is: ``` source_filename = "testcase.d" target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-apple-macosx" define void @_D7asanasm3fooFZv() { %a = alloca [4 x i32], align 32 call void asm sideeffect "movl %ebx, 4+$0",

I understood your modules and I see as them can be used in LNT. But there are some question about old features. 1. With Makefiles we can write pass and collect some statistics. There was an example of branch pass. Metrics can be collected by @-$(LOPT) -load dcc888$(SHLIBEXT) -branch-counter -stats \ -time-passes -disable-output $< 2>>$@ in makefile. In report file we write how

----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Molloy via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Vaivaswatha Nagaraj" <vn at compilertree.com> > Cc: "LLVM Dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:41:46 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Function attributes for LibFunc and its impact on GlobalsAA > >

Hi all, As we understood great changes will be done in LNT, so we are waiting to new LNT version and stopped our work in LNT. One more question about using test-suite separately with cmake. Cmake can only build all tests and generate lit tests. After that we can run LIT and get report which is not equal with report (simple) got with make. Cmake test-suite version has no features to run custom