search for: linkfil

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "linkfil".

Did you mean: linkfile
2004 Jun 03
5
4 important bugs again <;
...e as any other modern linux distro use perl 5.8.x, it''s even inside of its base. backports are under the peril of its author if no one voices up, i''ll close that bug in the next days. #244511: logcheck-database: While up- or downgrading logcheck-database: "Internal Error: linkfile() called without names !" hmm there is nice explication in the last message, but i do not understand a word: did the security team forget to set "logcheck-database/security_level" or was the package simply a corrupted one? could not reproduce neither with dialog nor with...
2018 Jan 15
1
"linkfile not having link" occurrs sometimes after renaming
...ad only for u2. Of course u2 can read these files. Later these files are renamed by u1. Then I switch to the user u2. I find that u2 can't list or access the renamed files. I see these errors in log: [2018-01-15 17:35:05.133711] I [MSGID: 109045] [dht-common.c:2393:dht_lookup_cbk] 25-data-dht: linkfile not having link subvol for /txt/file1.txt.bak [2018-01-15 17:35:05.139261] W [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:628:client3_3_unlink_cbk] 25-data-client-70: remote operation failed [Permission denied] [2018-01-15 17:35:05.139276] W [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:628:client3_3_unlink_cb...
2017 Nov 09
1
Error logged in fuse-mount log file
...ookup_unlink returned with op_ret -> 0 and op-errno -> 0 for /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) regards Amudhan P -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org...
2017 Nov 10
1
Error logged in fuse-mount log file
...d with op_ret -> 0 and op-errno -> 0 for > /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 > [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] > [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: > attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/th > i_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed > subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) > These can be ignored. regards > Amudhan P > > > _______________________________________________ > Glu...
2017 Nov 13
1
Error logged in fuse-mount log file
...gt; 0 and op-errno -> 0 for >> /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 >> [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] >> [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: >> attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/th >> i_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed >> subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) >> > > These can be ignored. > > > regards >> Amudhan P >> >> >> ______...
2017 Nov 13
1
Error logged in fuse-mount log file
...no -> 0 for >>> /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 >>> [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] >>> [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: >>> attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/th >>> i_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed >>> subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) >>> >> >> These can be ignored. >> >> >> regards >>> Amudhan...
2017 Nov 14
1
Error logged in fuse-mount log file
...okup_unlink returned with op_ret -> 0 and op-errno -> 0 for /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) </blockquote> These can be ignored. <blockquote> regards Amudhan P _______________________________________...
2017 Nov 14
1
Error logged in fuse-mount log file
...gt;>>> /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 >>>> [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] >>>> [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: >>>> attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/ >>>> thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed >>>> subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) >>>> >>>> >>> These can be ignored. >>> >>> >&...
2017 Nov 07
0
error logged in fuse-mount log file
...ookup_unlink returned with op_ret -> 0 and op-errno -> 0 for /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) regards Amudhan P -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org&...
2011 Aug 17
10
cluster.min-free-disk separate for each, brick
On 15/08/11 20:00, gluster-users-request at gluster.org wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:24:46 +0300 > From: "Deyan Chepishev - SuperHosting.BG"<dchepishev at superhosting.bg> > Subject: [Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk separate for each > brick > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Message-ID:<4E482F0E.3030604 at
2011 Jan 13
0
distribute-replicate setup GFS Client crashed
...node [2011-01-13 08:33:49.501919] I [afr-self-heal-common.c:1526:afr_self_heal_completion_cbk] replicate-1: background data self-heal completed on /streaming/set3/work/reduce.12.1294902171.dplog.temp [2011-01-13 08:33:49.531838] I [dht-common.c:402:dht_revalidate_cbk] distribute-1: linkfile found in revalidate for /streaming/set3/work/mapped/dpabort/multiple_reduce.flash_pl.2.1294901929.1.172.26.98.59.2.map.10 [2011-01-13 08:33:50.396055] W [fuse-bridge.c:2765:fuse_setlk_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: 2230985: ERR => -1 (Invalid argument) pending frames: frame : type...
2018 Apr 03
1
Sharding problem - multiple shard copies with mismatching gfids
...rt-350-zone1-dht: /489c6fb7-fe61-4407-8160-35c0aac40c85/images/_remove_me_9a0660e1-bd86-47ea-8e09-865c14f11f26/e2645bd1-a7f3-4cbd-9036-3d3cbc7204cd.meta found on cached subvol ovirt-350-zone1-replicate-5 [2018-04-03 02:07:57.967489] I [MSGID: 109070] [dht-common.c:2796:dht_lookup_linkfile_cbk] 0-ovirt-350-zone1-dht: Lookup of /.shard/927c6620-848b-4064-8c88-68a332b645c2.7 on ovirt-350-zone1-replicate-3 (following linkfile) failed ,gfid = 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 [No such file or directory] [2018-04-03 02:07:57.974815] I [MSGID: 109069] [dht-common.c:2095:dht...
2018 Apr 06
1
Sharding problem - multiple shard copies with mismatching gfids
.../489c6fb7-fe61-4407-8160-35c0aac40c85/images/_remove_ > me_9a0660e1-bd86-47ea-8e09-865c14f11f26/e2645bd1-a7f3-4cbd-9036-3d3cbc7204cd.meta > found on cached subvol ovirt-350-zone1-replicate-5 > [2018-04-03 02:07:57.967489] I [MSGID: 109070] > [dht-common.c:2796:dht_lookup_linkfile_cbk] 0-ovirt-350-zone1-dht: Lookup > of /.shard/927c6620-848b-4064-8c88-68a332b645c2.7 on > ovirt-350-zone1-replicate-3 (following linkfile) failed ,gfid = > 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 [No such file or directory] > [2018-04-03 02:07:57.974815] I [MSGID: 109069] > [...
2018 Mar 26
2
Sharding problem - multiple shard copies with mismatching gfids
...4:19.261733] E [MSGID: 133010] >> [shard.c:1724:shard_common_lookup_shards_cbk] 0-ovirt-zone1-shard: >> Lookup on shard 7 failed. Base file gfid = 87137cac-49eb-492a-8f33-8e33470d8cb7 >> [Stale file handle] >> The message "W [MSGID: 109009] [dht-common.c:2162:dht_lookup_linkfile_cbk] >> 0-ovirt-zone1-dht: /.shard/87137cac-49eb-492a-8f33-8e33470d8cb7.7: gfid >> different on data file on ovirt-zone1-replicate-3, gfid local = >> 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, gfid node = >> 57c6fcdf-52bb-4f7a-aea4-02f0dc81ff56 " repeated 2 times be...
2017 Dec 04
5
[RFC] - Deduplication of debug information in linkers (LLD).
Thanks for providing the experimental data! It clearly shows the value of type sections in DWARF. Regarding why type sections are off by default, aside from the issue of consumers needing to understand them, there is a size penalty to type sections that becomes more evident in smaller projects (meaning, fewer compilation units). The size penalty can be balanced against the amount of