search for: linkfile

...ad only for u2. Of course u2 can read these files. Later these files are renamed by u1. Then I switch to the user u2. I find that u2 can't list or access the renamed files. I see these errors in log: [2018-01-15 17:35:05.133711] I [MSGID: 109045] [dht-common.c:2393:dht_lookup_cbk] 25-data-dht: linkfile not having link subvol for /txt/file1.txt.bak [2018-01-15 17:35:05.139261] W [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:628:client3_3_unlink_cbk] 25-data-client-70: remote operation failed [Permission denied] [2018-01-15 17:35:05.139276] W [MSGID: 114031] [client-rpc-fops.c:628:client3_3_unlink_cbk] 25-dat...

...5.8 sarge as any other modern linux distro use perl 5.8.x, it's even inside of its base. backports are under the peril of its author if no one voices up, i'll close that bug in the next days. #244511: logcheck-database: While up- or downgrading logcheck-database: "Internal Error: linkfile() called without names !" hmm there is nice explication in the last message, but i do not understand a word: did the security team forget to set "logcheck-database/security_level" or was the package simply a corrupted one? could not reproduce neither with dialog nor with debco...

...ReportedBy: paredes@aecom.yu.edu QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org Greetings! Recently we found ourselves needing to use over 70 symbolic links [all within the documents area] on our website. These symlinks generate the annoying "rsync: failed to set permissions on "/linkpath/linkfile.php": Permission denied (13)" when I run a cron with "rsync -azPHO --rsync-path=/usr/local/rsync --links -e ssh remote.machine:/source/ target". Interestingly, a verbose output returns the following: [output snipped] set modtime of Linkfile.php to (1219952074) Thu Aug 28 15:...

...ink_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: lookup_unlink returned with op_ret -> 0 and op-errno -> 0 for /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) regards Amudhan P -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/...

...link returned with op_ret -> 0 and op-errno -> 0 for >> /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 >> [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] >> [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: >> attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/th >> i_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed >> subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) >> > > These can be ignored. > > > regards >> Amudhan P >> >> >> ___________________________________...

...: lookup_unlink > returned with op_ret -> 0 and op-errno -> 0 for > /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 > [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] > [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: > attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/th > i_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed > subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) > These can be ignored. regards > Amudhan P > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list >...

...nk_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: lookup_unlink returned with op_ret -> 0 and op-errno -> 0 for /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) </blockquote> These can be ignored. <blockquote> regards Amudhan P _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing l...

...th op_ret -> 0 and op-errno -> 0 for >>> /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 >>> [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] >>> [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: >>> attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/th >>> i_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed >>> subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) >>> >> >> These can be ignored. >> >> >> regards >>> Amudhan P >>> >>>...

...0 and op-errno -> 0 for >>>> /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 >>>> [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] >>>> [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: >>>> attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/ >>>> thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed >>>> subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) >>>> >>>> >>> These can be ignored. >>> >>> >>> regards >>>&...

...ink_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: lookup_unlink returned with op_ret -> 0 and op-errno -> 0 for /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 [2017-11-07 12:58:43.528844] I [MSGID: 109045] [dht-common.c:2012:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-glustervol-dht: attempting deletion of stale linkfile /thi_fol1/thi_fol2/thi_fol3/thi_fol4/thi_fol5/thi_fol6/thi_file1 on glustervol-disperse-77 (hashed subvol is glustervol-disperse-106) regards Amudhan P -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/2...

On 15/08/11 20:00, gluster-users-request at gluster.org wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:24:46 +0300 > From: "Deyan Chepishev - SuperHosting.BG"<dchepishev at superhosting.bg> > Subject: [Gluster-users] cluster.min-free-disk separate for each > brick > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Message-ID:<4E482F0E.3030604 at superhosting.bg>

...alid argument: inode [2011-01-13 08:33:49.501919] I [afr-self-heal-common.c:1526:afr_self_heal_completion_cbk] replicate-1: background data self-heal completed on /streaming/set3/work/reduce.12.1294902171.dplog.temp [2011-01-13 08:33:49.531838] I [dht-common.c:402:dht_revalidate_cbk] distribute-1: linkfile found in revalidate for /streaming/set3/work/mapped/dpabort/multiple_reduce.flash_pl.2.1294901929.1.172.26.98.59.2.map.10 [2011-01-13 08:33:50.396055] W [fuse-bridge.c:2765:fuse_setlk_cbk] glusterfs-fuse: 2230985: ERR => -1 (Invalid argument) pending frames: frame : type(1) op(FLUSH) frame : typ...

...ookup_cbk] 0-ovirt-350-zone1-dht: /489c6fb7-fe61-4407-8160-35c0aac40c85/images/_remove_me_9a0660e1-bd86-47ea-8e09-865c14f11f26/e2645bd1-a7f3-4cbd-9036-3d3cbc7204cd.meta found on cached subvol ovirt-350-zone1-replicate-5 [2018-04-03 02:07:57.967489] I [MSGID: 109070] [dht-common.c:2796:dht_lookup_linkfile_cbk] 0-ovirt-350-zone1-dht: Lookup of /.shard/927c6620-848b-4064-8c88-68a332b645c2.7 on ovirt-350-zone1-replicate-3 (following linkfile) failed ,gfid = 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 [No such file or directory] [2018-04-03 02:07:57.974815] I [MSGID: 109069] [dht-common.c:2095:dht_lookup_u...

...zone1-dht: > /489c6fb7-fe61-4407-8160-35c0aac40c85/images/_remove_ > me_9a0660e1-bd86-47ea-8e09-865c14f11f26/e2645bd1-a7f3-4cbd-9036-3d3cbc7204cd.meta > found on cached subvol ovirt-350-zone1-replicate-5 > [2018-04-03 02:07:57.967489] I [MSGID: 109070] > [dht-common.c:2796:dht_lookup_linkfile_cbk] 0-ovirt-350-zone1-dht: Lookup > of /.shard/927c6620-848b-4064-8c88-68a332b645c2.7 on > ovirt-350-zone1-replicate-3 (following linkfile) failed ,gfid = > 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 [No such file or directory] > [2018-04-03 02:07:57.974815] I [MSGID: 109069] > [dht-commo...

...> [dht-rebalance.c:1150:gf_defrag_migrate_data] 0-bigdata-dht: Failed to > get node-uuid for > /foo/data/onemil/dataset/bar/f8old/baz/85/m_85_211665292_59a24211c3.t7 > [2012-11-30 11:06:12.620798] I > [dht-common.c:954:dht_lookup_everywhere_cbk] 0-bigdata-dht: deleting > stale linkfile > /foo/data/onemil/dataset/bar/f8old/baz/85/m_85_282643649_15d4108d95.t7 > on bigdata-replicate-6 [...] (at this point, I stopped rebalancing, and got the following in the logs) > [2012-11-30 11:06:33.152153] E > [dht-rebalance.c:1374:gf_defrag_fix_layout] 0-bigdata-dht: Fix layout...

...MSGID: 133010] >>> [shard.c:1724:shard_common_lookup_shards_cbk] 0-ovirt-zone1-shard: >>> Lookup on shard 7 failed. Base file gfid = 87137cac-49eb-492a-8f33-8e33470d8cb7 >>> [Stale file handle] >>> The message "W [MSGID: 109009] [dht-common.c:2162:dht_lookup_linkfile_cbk] >>> 0-ovirt-zone1-dht: /.shard/87137cac-49eb-492a-8f33-8e33470d8cb7.7: gfid >>> different on data file on ovirt-zone1-replicate-3, gfid local = >>> 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, gfid node = >>> 57c6fcdf-52bb-4f7a-aea4-02f0dc81ff56 " repeated 2 t...

Thanks for providing the experimental data! It clearly shows the value of type sections in DWARF. Regarding why type sections are off by default, aside from the issue of consumers needing to understand them, there is a size penalty to type sections that becomes more evident in smaller projects (meaning, fewer compilation units). The size penalty can be balanced against the amount of

...4:19.261733] E [MSGID: 133010] >> [shard.c:1724:shard_common_lookup_shards_cbk] 0-ovirt-zone1-shard: >> Lookup on shard 7 failed. Base file gfid = 87137cac-49eb-492a-8f33-8e33470d8cb7 >> [Stale file handle] >> The message "W [MSGID: 109009] [dht-common.c:2162:dht_lookup_linkfile_cbk] >> 0-ovirt-zone1-dht: /.shard/87137cac-49eb-492a-8f33-8e33470d8cb7.7: gfid >> different on data file on ovirt-zone1-replicate-3, gfid local = >> 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000, gfid node = >> 57c6fcdf-52bb-4f7a-aea4-02f0dc81ff56 " repeated 2 times between &gt...