search for: lineo

...libc.git;a=commit;h=4a84d61a24296b8253b3f8f7c86ee28df53e2f3b Author: David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net> AuthorDate: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:31:17 +0800 Committer: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> CommitDate: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 10:46:37 +0200 [klibc] [SHELL] Allow building without LINEO support Simply specify --disable-lineno to configure. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> --- usr/dash/var.c | 4 ++++ usr/dash/var.h | 6 ++++...

It's half a nice Saturday later and many attempts have brought no satisfaction. Maybe this can't be done. I'm trying to write a function which, when called from one function execute in another. In itself, that's not the problem. Rather, there's one built-in variable which is evaluated in the function definition and it's value is then set (too early). Here's the one

...arnings, usually because I miss them on x86_64, then someone builds on ia64 or ppc, etc and e-mails me. This is trivial to avoid though - we keep making the same mistake: { u64 block; printk("block: %llu\n", block); } That code above will generate a warning similar to: fs/ocfs2/xxx.c:lineo: warning: long long unsigned int format, u64 arg (arg X) Instead, you must always cast 'u64' and 's64' to whatever you're asking printk to print. For example, the correct form of the above example would be: { u64 block; printk("block: %llu\n", (unsigned long long)b...

Any idea? Thank you very much~

I''m having trouble with nexthdr. tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10:0 prio 1 u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff match u8 0x02 0x12 at nexthdr+13 flowid 10:3 fails to match my test packets whereas tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 10:0 prio 1 u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff match u8 0x02 0x12 at 33 flowid 10:3 does match them. Of course, the second one is really wrong

...Bill Pringlemeir (1): [klibc] [PATCH] fix ARM longjmp with zero 'val'. Christoph Mathys (1): [klibc] [BUILTIN] Add support for ulimit -r Colin Watson (1): [klibc] include: [sys/time.h] fix for Linux 3.5.1 David S. Miller (1): [klibc] [SHELL] Allow building without LINEO support H. Peter Anvin (1): [klibc] 2.0.1 released, next version is 2.0.2 Harald van Dijk (1): [klibc] [ARITH] Avoid imaxdiv when only one of the results is wanted Herbert Xu (3): [klibc] [BUILTIN] Eliminate unnecessary promotion in echocmd [klibc] [BUILTIN] Merge SKIPFUN...

Hello All, Well my Samba server is up and running good, but I am now needing to be able to let some of my users connect to our server who is not located on our local network. Actually they are located some distance away and I would like to be able to allow then to connect. Has anyone had any success with this and how it might be done? Best Regards, Lonnie -- Lonnie Cumberland OutStep

...he office that serves 4 clients. At home I have a Win98 machine. I use a M$ pptp VPN connection from home to connect via my ISP to my office LAN. Basically: [home] => [cable modem] => [ISP] => [cable modem] => [Linux Box] => [office LAN] The Linux setup is: pptpd daemon from poptop.lineo.com IP FORWDING enabled The home Win98 setup is: standard M$ VPN There is no reason this wouldn't work with a dialup to connect to the ISP. Check out http://poptop.lineo.com The only other thought I have that pertains to the 55-57 second lag time would have to do with how your Linux box is a...

...amba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba It depends on "what you are trying to connect to what." Two scenarios: (1) Use IPSEC for: LAN1=>LINUX/SAMBA==>INTERNET/VPN==>LINUX/SAMBA=>LAN2 (2) Use pptpd for: WinXX client==>INTERNET/VPN==>LINUX/SAMBA=>LAN I use (2). See poptop.lineo.com for the poptop pptpd software and config. Don't forget to set IP_Forward=true if you go this route. I have a cable connection and both ends and this setup really works well. -- David Rankin Rankin*Bertin, PLLC Nacogdoches, Texas Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de> Delivered-To...