search for: line5

...:0008150"$Children 4 for ( i in 1:length(level2)) { 5 level3 <- getGOChildren(level2[i])$level2[i]$Children 6 for ( j in 1:length(level3)){ 7 level3term <- getGOTerm(as.character(level3[j]))$BP$level3[j] 8 level3term 9 } 10 } What is the difference between line 3 and line5? In the line 3 I retrieved the GO identifiers at level 2 successfullly but in the line 5 I got nothing. How to correct the line 5 to retrieve the GO terms at level 3 correctly? Thank you in advance! Josh

...name <- function(trait.file){ #line1 setwd('/root/subroot') # line 2 load('imge.RData') # line3 imge <- imge[,-c(3)] # line4 imge <- imge[complete.cases(imge),] # line5 trait<- read.csv(trait.file) # line6 ngenes <- nrow(imge) # line7 nsnp <- nrow(trait) #line 8 for(i in 1:ngenes) { for(j in 1:nsnp) { if(imge$d1[i]==trait$d1[j] & imge$d2[i]==trait$d2[j]) trait$imgene2[j] <- imge$Gene[i]...

...rainB -0.8797408 0.4148904 0.1091490 -8.06 7.8e-16 (line3) strainC -0.7378955 0.4781191 0.1045977 -7.05 1.7e-12 (line4 ) infection_ni:strainB 0.7631418 2.1450049 0.1462481 5.22 1.8e-07 (line5 ) infection_ni:strainC 0.5358302 1.7088664 0.1431092 3.74 1.8e-04 Random effects: ~1 | block block Variance: 0.02493629 I'm not sure I understand properly what are the hazard ratios in the *exp(coef) column* for the two interaction terms. In the R book...

Can you also post information such as: Type of phone (model Number would be idela) How is it conencted, SIP, ZAP, IAX, Channel Bank. Corresponding config files would also help. Help us help you. >>-----Original Message----- >>From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com >>[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of >>Paul A Brown >>Sent:

...nsion\User ID line4_displayname: "Line4" ; Line 4 Display Name line4_shortname: "2001" line4_authname: "phone" ; Line 4 Registration Authentication line4_password: "101" ; Line 4 Registration Password # Line 5 Settings line5_name: "2001" ; Line 5 Extension\User ID line5_displayname: "Line5" ; Line 5 Display Name line5_shortname: "2001" line5_authname: "2001" ; Line 5 Registration Authentication line5_password: "phone"...

Dear R users, First of all, thanks for the incredibly fast answers and help of Rolf, Marc and Robert. Yes, I noticed that it was a lot of permutacions, but my intention was to make this process automatic and take only 5.000 - 10.000 permutations. Therefore, I wanted only to take that "interesting permutations" with "some information" [inter-block permutations]. The

...mentptr inbounds (%struct.test* bitcast (%0* @vm to %struct.test*), i32 0, i32 1), align 1 19 br label %return 20 21 return: ; preds = %entry 22 %retval1 = load i32* %retval ; <i32> [#uses=1] 23 ret i32 %retval1 24 } In line5-6, bitfields for struct type is merged. Merging bitfields is affected by type alignment and type size. (type alignment and type size are target dependent information.) I have been convert above bitcode to more target independent bitcode as following. 1 ; ModuleID = './temp2.c' 2 targe...

On 19 October 2010 07:57, Jin Gu Kang <jaykang10 at imrc.kist.re.kr> wrote: > Frist, I have been implementing common type for struct type on bitcode > at compilation time using llvm-gcc and then changing common type to target > specific types at code generation time using llc (reconstruct StructLayout). Hi Jin, Apart from bitfields and unions, the struct type is pretty much target

Hi LLVM members, I have been working to make target independent memory layout for struct type(Aggregate type) in my team. I think that struct type has different memory layouts according to each target system in current LLVM. To implement target dependent concept for struct type, Frist, I have been implementing common type for struct type on bitcode at compilation time using llvm-gcc and then