Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "libtomcrypt".
Did you mean:
libmcrypt
2019 Nov 06
2
Samab 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
> On 11/5/19 8:26 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote:
>> can you provide more detail?
>>
>> RHEL7 has libtomcrypt but no devel rpm for it.
>> That's the onoy issue I had with it.
>
> tomcrypt.h is required for build this package.
Yes, that's the reason I've rebuilt libtomcrypt from the RHEL sources (see
https://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.2/RHEL7/SRPMS/libtomcrypt-...
2019 Nov 01
4
Samab 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi everyone,
I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for
RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). The 4.11 rpms use the python3 and
python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the
same time as the 7.7 version.
Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed.
http://nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.2
2012 May 23
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM test a pass
Hi,
I'm currently developping a pass for LLVM and I was wondering what's the best way to test if it work correctly.
Right now to test my pass, I'm compiling libtomcrypt with LLVM and an other time LLVM+my pass. After that I run the test framework of libtomcrypt
and compare the result.
Is there a best way to do that? Maybe using the test suite from LLVM is better (I tought it used some "very" particular piece of code to see if LLVM does it's job)?
T...
2014 Mar 26
2
[LLVMdev] Linking problem
...ble with an array of
blockaddress and an indirectbr instruction.
It get a blockaddress in the array (via getelementptr and an index) and
then jump to this basicblock via the indirectbr.
I tried to compile several libraries to test my pass and the run their
test-suite. It works fine with, for e.g, libTomCrypt (in -O0,1,2,3).
With GMP or ImageMagick it works fine in -O0, but whenever I try in
-O1,2,3 it fail and I get a tons of errors like (note that the
compilation/link of the libs itself works, it fails when I make a 'make
check'):
...
./.libs/libtests.a(misc.o):(.rodata+0x5b0): undefined refe...
2012 May 23
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM test a pass
...your test.
Regards,
Raphael Ernani
2012/5/23 Rinaldini Julien <julien.rinaldini at heig-vd.ch>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently developping a pass for LLVM and I was wondering what's the best way to test if it work correctly.
>
> Right now to test my pass, I'm compiling libtomcrypt with LLVM and an other time LLVM+my pass. After that I run the test framework of libtomcrypt
> and compare the result.
>
> Is there a best way to do that? Maybe using the test suite from LLVM is better (I tought it used some "very" particular piece of code to see if LLVM does it&...
2003 Jul 10
3
Question about porting SSH
Hello everybody,
I am working on a project trying to port openSSH and have noticed that some
of the components rely on SSL which is a pretty big program as well. Is
there any way to just rip out certain modules from SSL to get openSSH to
work with out porting all of the SSL components, and if so what are the only
SSL modules I need to get SSH to work properly. Any help will be greatly
2005 Nov 17
4
[Bug 1119] Enhancement request for raising minimum acceptable key length.
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1119
Summary: Enhancement request for raising minimum acceptable key
length.
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 4.2p1
Platform: Other
URL: http://www.rsasecurity.com/press_release.asp?doc_id=488&
id=1034
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
2020 Feb 14
2
Samab 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi Konstantin,
True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x for
glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about?
Vincent
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, Konstantin Shalygin via samba wrote:
>> Ah, good catch! I'll update it shortly.
>> Thanks
>
> Vincent, this issue still not fixed even for samba 4.11.6
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> k
>
2020 Feb 15
0
Samab 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
On 2/14/20 8:16 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote:
> True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x
> for glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about?
I mean libtomcrypt-devel is still commented in SPEC.
k
2013 Nov 23
1
Possible to use Tinc with embedded SSL implementations like PolarSSL, YaSSL?
I've tried my best searching for whether this question has already been
posted to tinc listservs, so apologies if this is a repeat question.
Is it possible to use tinc with SSL implementations besides OpenSSL, e.g.
the PolarSSL or YaSSL/cyassl libraries used on embedded distros like
OpenWRT?
Thank you.
--
Ben West
http://gowasabi.net
ben at gowasabi.net
314-246-9434
-------------- next
2014 Dec 28
5
Current state of Tinc 1.1?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote:
> Although the cryptography is now separated from the rest of the logic in
> tinc, it is not really replaceable, since only OpenSSL is supported.
> However, there is also a new protocol in tinc 1.1, which uses Ed25519
> and ChaCha-Poly1305. The code for those algorithms is included in tinc,
> so the
2016 Dec 15
0
Redhat Dependencies
...3.10.0-514.2.2.el7
updates 4.8 M
libdb-devel x86_64
5.3.21-19.el7
base 38 k
libtomcrypt x86_64
1.17-23.el7
epel 224 k
libtommath x86_64
0.42.0-4.el7...
2016 Dec 15
3
Redhat Dependencies
Centos and redhat repositories are not the same. Also I tried epel already.
They may change the names of the related packages so I ll ask to redhat
team ASAP. Actually I'm testing it out so I have no hurry.
I ll let you know guys
mobile!
15 Ara 2016 ÖS 9:49 tarihinde "Vinicius Lehmann via samba" <
samba at lists.samba.org> yazdı:
> Hi,
>
> Execute* yum install