vincent at cojot.name
2020-Feb-14 13:16 UTC
[Samba] Samab 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi Konstantin, True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x for glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about? Vincent On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, Konstantin Shalygin via samba wrote:>> Ah, good catch! I'll update it shortly. >> Thanks > > Vincent, this issue still not fixed even for samba 4.11.6 > > > > Thanks, > > k > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > >
Konstantin Shalygin
2020-Feb-15 12:30 UTC
[Samba] Samab 4.11.2, 4.10.10 and 4.9.15 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
On 2/14/20 8:16 PM, vincent at cojot.name wrote:> True, for 4.11.y I didn't backport the changes I made on 4.9.x/4.10.x > for glusterfs. Is this what you were talking about?I mean libtomcrypt-devel is still commented in SPEC. k
vincent at cojot.name
2020-Jul-03 18:58 UTC
[Samba] Samba 4.11.11, 4.10.17 and 4.12.5 for rhel7/centos7 rpms
Hi everyone, I've posted some rpm builds of samba 4.11.11, 4.10.17 and 4.12.5 for RHEL/Centos 7.x (currently 7.7). These rpms use the python3 and python3-devel rpms introduced in the standard RHEL/Centos repos at the same time as the 7.7 version. Comments and/or testing feedback would be most welcomed. nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.12.5 nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.11.11 nova.polymtl.ca/~coyote/dist/samba/samba-4.10.17 Credits: - Nico Kadel-Garcia for the compat-* rpms - Guenther Deschner & others for maintaining the fedora rpms Please don't hesitate to provide feedback (good or bad). Kind Regards, Vincent