Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "librarifi".
Did you mean:
librarify
2000 Dec 18
1
R: Some libraries and ideas for a 'librarified' R
...nkgroup.it
Databank S.P.A
Via Spartaco, 19, ITALY
Tel. + 39 02 55002251
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Luke Tierney <luke@muskrat.stat.umn.edu>
A: Federico Spinazzi <spinazzi@databankgroup.it>
Data: venerdì 15 dicembre 2000 19.25
Oggetto: Re: [Rd] Some libraries and ideas for a 'librarified' R
>Sounds interesting. Is the code available to look at?
>
>Thanks
>
>luke
>
>Federico Spinazzi wrote:
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send &...
2000 Dec 20
0
R: R: Some libraries and ideas for a 'librarified' R
...2251
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at>
A: Federico Spinazzi <spinazzi@databankgroup.it>
Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch <r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch>
Data: lunedì 18 dicembre 2000 11.00
Oggetto: Re: R: [Rd] Some libraries and ideas for a 'librarified' R
>>>>>> Federico Spinazzi writes:
>
>> Well, I think the better solution would be to put them on the web: I
>> tried to open two web pages but I forget the possword every time :-(.
>
>> I see 2 quick solutions:
>> - send the files via e-mail...
2000 Dec 15
0
Some libraries and ideas for a 'librarified' R
Hy you all,
Short version:
I think I have some code that could be interesting to make the R
architecture evolve towards better thread support, easier memory management,
better user interface programming (progress bar, logs), powerful debugging
without recompiling (hach!)
some years ago I start learning C with an ambitious project: write a C
library for multivariate data analysis.
On the route I
2019 May 10
2
contributing llvm-lipo
Every case is different,
but yes, as I said - I would like to take a closer look at the problem
again,
it might be the case that we don't need this complexity in this particular
case,
but want to double check.
But yeah, in general I agree with you!
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 6:09 PM Jake Ehrlich <jakehehrlich at google.com> wrote:
> I think that pretty much hits the nail on the head.
2019 Mar 26
2
GSoC19: Improve LLVM binary utilities
Hi all,
My name is Seiya Nuta. I'm studying for my master's degree in University
of Tsukuba and interested in the project named "Improve LLVM binary
utilities". I've skimmed through llvm-objcopy/llvm-objdump, commit logs,
and Bugzilla to figure out what should I do.
I have some questions about the project:
- What should I prioritize? I suppose that improving llvm-objcopy
2019 Mar 26
4
GSoC19: Improve LLVM binary utilities
(Adding just a bit to Jake's response)
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:31 AM Jake Ehrlich via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi Seiya,
>
> What should I prioritize? I suppose that improving llvm-objcopy is the
>> most crucial work in this summer.
>
>
> This is an opinion that will vary a lot from person to person.
>
+1! And don't forget that