search for: librarify

Well, I think the better solution would be to put them on the web: I tried to open two web pages but I forget the possword every time :-(. I see 2 quick solutions: - send the files via e-mail - put the files on CRAN (where?); However I can do these in 2-3 days only (I have sources home). Regards, Federico Spinazzi spinazzi@databankgroup.it Databank S.P.A Via Spartaco, 19, ITALY Tel. + 39 02

I've just uploaded the files Thanks for your attention, Federico Spinazzi spinazzi@databankgroup.it Databank S.P.A Via Spartaco, 19, ITALY Tel. + 39 02 55002251 -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Kurt Hornik <Kurt.Hornik@ci.tuwien.ac.at> A: Federico Spinazzi <spinazzi@databankgroup.it> Cc: r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch <r-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch> Data: lunedì 18 dicembre 2000

Hy you all, Short version: I think I have some code that could be interesting to make the R architecture evolve towards better thread support, easier memory management, better user interface programming (progress bar, logs), powerful debugging without recompiling (hach!) some years ago I start learning C with an ambitious project: write a C library for multivariate data analysis. On the route I

Every case is different, but yes, as I said - I would like to take a closer look at the problem again, it might be the case that we don't need this complexity in this particular case, but want to double check. But yeah, in general I agree with you! On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 6:09 PM Jake Ehrlich <jakehehrlich at google.com> wrote: > I think that pretty much hits the nail on the head.

Hi all, My name is Seiya Nuta. I'm studying for my master's degree in University of Tsukuba and interested in the project named "Improve LLVM binary utilities". I've skimmed through llvm-objcopy/llvm-objdump, commit logs, and Bugzilla to figure out what should I do. I have some questions about the project: - What should I prioritize? I suppose that improving llvm-objcopy

...o find things to do there. > I think objcopy has the *most* things that have left to be done, but there's plenty of work in other binutils. I'm not sure if any particular bit would be called "crucial" however. A couple ideas that have been kicked around for llvm-objcopy are: * Librarify it (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41044) * Improve MachO/COFF support (COFF support is pretty good, MachO is barely there). * Support ihex (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39841) or efi ( https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40618) [Not that many people are probably asking for these...