search for: libnvpair

...9;d take a stab at the first steps of porting ZFS to Darwin. I realize there are rumors that Apple is already doing this, but my contact at Apple has yet to get back to me to verify this. In the meantime, I wanted to see how hard it would be. I started with libzfs, and promptly ran into issues with libnvpair. It wants sys/nvpair.h, but I can''t find that in the http://svn.genunix.org/repos/on/trunk/ tree. Could someone please point me in the right direction? Thanks! -- This messages posted from opensolaris.org

...= 0 mmap(0x00000000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON, -1, 0) = 0xFE610000 memcntl(0xFE510000, 9080, MC_ADVISE, MADV_WILLNEED, 0, 0) = 0 brk(0x080A9000) = 0 ioctl(3, ZFS_IOC_POOL_CONFIGS, 0x08042590) = 0 stat64("/lib/libnvpair.so.1", 0x08041AB8) = 0 resolvepath("/lib/libnvpair.so.1", "/lib/libnvpair.so.1", 1023) = 19 open("/lib/libnvpair.so.1", O_RDONLY) = 6 mmapobj(6, MMOBJ_INTERPRET, 0xFE6105D0, 0x08041B24, 0x00000000) = 0 close(6)...

...zozo.afpicl.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CORE amd64 # svnversion 238067M # make NOCLEAN=yes NO_CLEAN=yes buildworld [...] ===> cddl/lib (obj,depend,all,install) ===> cddl/lib/drti (obj) ===> cddl/lib/libavl (obj) ===> cddl/lib/libctf (obj) ===> cddl/lib/libdtrace (obj) ===> cddl/lib/libnvpair (obj) ===> cddl/lib/libumem (obj) ===> cddl/lib/libuutil (obj) ===> cddl/lib/libzfs (obj) ===> cddl/lib/libzpool (obj) ===> cddl/lib/drti (depend) ===> cddl/lib/libavl (depend) ===> cddl/lib/libctf (depend) ===> cddl/lib/libdtrace (depend) ===> cddl/lib/libnvpair (depend)...

Hi all, I am installing a zone onto two different V445s running S10U4 and the zones are taking hours to install (about 1000 packages), that is, the problem is identical on both systems. A bit of trussing and dtracing has shown that the pkginstalls being run by the zoneadm install are making door_call calls to nscd that are taking very long, so far observed to be 5 to 40 seconds, but always in

...svc_init 39969 pid5462 rpc.metad svc_init entry 39971 pid5462 rpc.metad svc_init return While on mdb I can successfully put a breakpoint on check_host call: root@# mdb -p `pgrep rpc.metad` Loading modules: [ ld.so.1 libc.so.1 libnvpair.so.1 libuutil.so.1 libavl.so.1 ] > check_host:b > :c mdb: stop at check_host mdb: target stopped at: check_host: save %sp, -0x68, %sp > $c check_host(ffbff930, 3dd50, 2e800, 2e800, 41cc, 4000) svc_init+0x88(3c650, 2, ffbff930, 2ee78, ffbff934, 2ec00) mdrpc_lock_set_common+0x58...

...l to Sun people this is ardbeg.sfbay ardbeg# zpool list internal error: Bad file number Jun 19 11:10:57 ardbeg genunix: NOTICE: core_log: zpool[4895] core dumped: /var/core/zpool.4895.core zsh: IOT instruction (core dumped) zpool list ardbeg# mdb zpool.4895.core Loading modules: [ libumem.so.1 libnvpair.so.1 libuutil.so.1 libc.so.1 libsysevent.so.1 libavl.so.1 ld.so.1 ] > $c libc.so.1`_lwp_kill+7(1, 6) libc.so.1`raise+0x22(6) libc.so.1`abort+0xcd(9, 80db548, fefba000, 8042e34, fef79953, 80db96c) libzfs.so.1`zfs_verror+0xce(80db548, 7f7, fefa8b14, 8042e74) libzfs.so.1`zfs_standard_error+0x7d(8...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2340 Bug ID: 2340 Summary: Openssh issue: unable to ssh the solaris server from ldap users Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Hardware: Sparc OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: PAM

It seems we are hitting a boundary with zfs send/receive over a network link (10Gb/s). We can see peak values of up to 150MB/s, but on average about 40-50MB/s are replicated. This is far away from the bandwidth that a 10Gb link can offer. Is it possible, that ZFS is giving replication a too low priority/throttling it too much?

Banging my head against a Seagate 3TB USB3 drive. Its marketing name is: Seagate Expansion 3 TB USB 3.0 Desktop External Hard Drive STAY3000102 format(1M) shows it identify itself as: Seagate-External-SG11-2.73TB Under both Solaris 10 and Solaris 11x, I receive the evil message: | I/O request is not aligned with 4096 disk sector size. | It is handled through Read Modify Write but the performance

I decided to take a stab at 6601421 dladm set-linkprop should support multiple -p options along with some related linkprop fixes, but when I looked into dladm.c, was surprised to find that "dladm_parse_props()" is called from do_create_aggr and do_create_vlan in addition to the expected (by me, at least) do_create_vnic *linkprop functions. What happened here? Why do we pass in

...%icc, +0x104 <create_zfs_zonepath+0x1e8> > create_zfs_zonepath+0xd8::bp > :c mdb: stop at create_zfs_zonepath+0xd8 mdb: target stopped at: create_zfs_zonepath+0xd8: call +0x165d8 <PLT:zfs_create> mdb: You''ve got symbols! Loading modules: [ libuutil.so.1 libnvpair.so.1 ] > ::regs %g0 = 0x0000000000000000 %l0 = 0x00025400 %g1 = 0x0000000000067740 %l1 = 0x00000000 %g2 = 0x0000000000000000 %l2 = 0x00037c00 zoneadm`_iob+0x88 %g3 = 0x0000000000000000 %l3 = 0x00000000 %g4 = 0xfffffffffffffc14...

Hello! The current MCA/MCE support in Xen is that it dumps the error and panics. In the following concept I propose here, there are two places where Xen has to react on. I) Xen receives a MCE from the CPU and II) Xen receives Dom0 instructions via Hypercall The term "self-healing" below is used in the sense of using the most propriate technique(s) to handle an error such as MPR