search for: libfiles

Hello, in order to get ready for the upcoming LLVM 3.1 release, I checked out the 3.1 Release branch. However, unlike with LLVM 3.0, `llvm-config --libfiles` now also reports files that belong to targets that I did not build (and that are thus not available). Is this expected? Thanks, Keno -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120511/38bebe3f/attachmen...

On 05/12/2012 04:22 AM, Keno Fischer wrote: > in order to get ready for the upcoming LLVM 3.1 release, I checked out > the 3.1 Release branch. However, unlike with LLVM 3.0, `llvm-config > --libfiles` now also reports files that belong to targets that I did not > build (and that are thus not available). Is this expected? I can confirm this. I always build LLVM with configure --enable-targets=host-only. With LLVM 3.0, llvm-config --libfiles only reports the /usr/local/lib/libLLVMX86CodeGen...

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 10:45:22 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai Rowland, > > Can you add in the wiki.. > If you are building Samba >= 4.5.0, you will also require > libgpgme11-dev python-gpgme python-m2crypto > > And from debian backports you may need : debhelper dh-autoreconf > dh-strip-nondeterminism

I've run into a problem with the ocaml bindings and the jit. It builds fine without the jit, but when I try to include it it tries to use the c object files from the build location, instead of the install location: > llvm-config --libdir --libfiles engine /opt/local/lib /opt/local/lib/LLVMX86.o /opt/local/lib/libLLVMSelectionDAG.a /opt/local/lib/libLLVMCodeGen.a /opt/local/lib/libLLVMScalarOpts.a /opt/local/lib/libLLVMTransformUtils.a /opt/local/lib/libLLVMipa.a /opt/local/lib/libLLVMAnalysis.a /opt/local/lib/LLVMExecutionEngine.o /opt/local/...

Possibly off the wall and a long shot, but is pre-installed Linux perhaps 32 bit, while the R attempt is 64? JN On 16-03-23 02:22 PM, Barnet Wagman wrote: > Synaptic can show the origin of packages. > > The only thing I see from a backport is > > libcmanager0 > > I don't think this is relevant to R. Or is it. > > The only thing I've got installed from

I can make a few suggestions to help you hunt for the issue. This kind of error is often caused by conflicting packages from proposed, backports, ppas, or other 3rd party repos. If for some reason you have a dependency installed from one of those sources that is newer than what R on cran was built against (stock ubuntu 14.04) then you will hit a conflict. Simply removing backports from your repos

That could do it http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty-backports/libcgmanager0 Seems to be libc related, which is a pretty core library to much of the whole system. Hmm, which model Dell? We just got a Dell 5000 series with Ubuntu, I have not checked with my boss if there was R installation issues. Thanks, Alex On 03/23/2016 11:22 AM, Barnet Wagman wrote: > Synaptic can show the origin of

On 23 March 2016 at 09:35, Barnet Wagman wrote: | I am unable to install R on an up to date (i.e. apt upgraded) Ubuntu | 14.04 system. According to | https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/README (and many other sources), | R is available for this version of Ubuntu (which is a stable version). | | I currently have | | deb https://cran.cnr.berkeley.edu/bin/linux/ubuntu trusty/ | | in

Synaptic can show the origin of packages. The only thing I see from a backport is libcmanager0 I don't think this is relevant to R. Or is it. The only thing I've got installed from a ppa is mate (a desktop). I don't see anything related to mate that is related to R. FYI the ubunu I'm using came preinstalled from Dell (on a notebook; usually I install linux myself). On

...age. I'm compiling it as follows, which completes with no errors on either LLVM version. LLVM_CONFIG=<the llvm-config from the version I want to use> gcc `$LLVM_CONFIG --cflags` -o main.o -c main.c g++ `$LLVM_CONFIG --cflags` \ `$LLVM_CONFIG --ldflags` \ main.o `$(LLVM_CONFIG) --libfiles engine BitReader` Am I missing some other post 2.5 API change or am I building things wrong? Thanks, - Dave

It's a Dell XPS 13. Obviously I don't understand what's in libcmanager0. I wonder if I can safely replace it. I'm a bit uneasy about replacing things Dell installed. I gather there are some specialized drivers for the monitor on this system. On 03/23/2016 11:34 AM, Alex M wrote: > That could do it > http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty-backports/libcgmanager0 > >

I am unable to install R on an up to date (i.e. apt upgraded) Ubuntu 14.04 system. According to https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/README (and many other sources), R is available for this version of Ubuntu (which is a stable version). I currently have deb https://cran.cnr.berkeley.edu/bin/linux/ubuntu trusty/ in sources.list. I've tried this with and without deb

...Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > I've run into a problem with the ocaml bindings and the jit. It builds > fine without the jit, but when I try to include it it tries to use the > c object files from the build location, instead of the install > location: > >> llvm-config --libdir --libfiles engine > /opt/local/lib > /opt/local/lib/LLVMX86.o /opt/local/lib/libLLVMSelectionDAG.a > /opt/local/lib/libLLVMCodeGen.a /opt/local/lib/libLLVMScalarOpts.a > /opt/local/lib/libLLVMTransformUtils.a /opt/local/lib/libLLVMipa.a > /opt/local/lib/libLLVMAnalysis.a /opt/local/lib/LLVMExec...

...aid before. http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/OCamlLangImpl7.html mentions it, but I don't know enough about the ocaml build process to say whether that'll work. I believe I'm already doing that, properly by passing -ccopt -rdynamic to ocamlopt: ocamlopt -cc g++ -ccopt -rdynamic -linkall $(LIBFILES) -o alpha $(OBJFILES) I've also tried writing a dummy "puts" function in a C file and linking that with my executable. nm -D then shows the following: 000000000054b690 T camlRuntime__rt_fputs_208 000000000054b590 T camlRuntime__rt_puts_198 U fputs 0000000000c43044 T...

...gt; > > > So I'm still mystified. > > Put them at the end of the library list: > > -lLLVMCore -lLLVMSupport -lLLVMSystem -limagehlp -lpsapi -lm This works. I had a look at changing the llvm-config.in.in but my Perl hacking skills aren't up to getting --libnames and --libfiles to work as well as --libs. I discovered one other thing that was causing me problems on MinGW: if I use the msys.bat to open a terminal llvm-config inserts double slashes at the start of any absolute path it generates (e.g. //lib/LLVMX86CodeGen.o) - this breaks g++. If I do the same thing from a...

Dears, i have Samba4 and LDAP in CENTOS , but i have install this samba4 in DEBIAN How i to search the equivalent package for compilation samba in Debian repository quickly. I used this below packages for compilation samba4 in CENTOS. findutils readline glibc-devel findutils-locate gcc flex compat-readline4 db-devel gcc-c++ make python libacl-devel libblkid-devel gnutls-devel readline-devel

Forgive me if this is the wrong area to ask this question. I'm happy to inquire to a diff list if that's better. From: http://libguestfs.org/ "Downloads For source see the downloads directory. In Fedora or Red Hat Enterprise Linux: sudo yum install libguestfs-tools On Debian/Ubuntu: sudo apt-get install libguestfs-tools Open a disk image: guestfish --ro -i -a disk.img Other

Hi! Thanks for answer. Start-Date: 2018-03-19  12:00:50 Commandline: apt-get install winbind Install: python-crypto:amd64 (2.6.1-4ubuntu0.2, automatic), update-inetd:amd64 (4.43, automatic), python-samba:amd64 (4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.14, automatic), winbind:amd64 (4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.14), tdb-tools:amd64 (1.3.8-0ubuntu0.14.04.1, automatic), samba:amd64

Ok, I attached it to the bug. For reference, here's what I'm using on unix as a workaround as long as this is not fixed: llvm-config --libfiles | xargs -n 1 -I {} sh -c 'test -f {} && echo {}' On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Albert Graef <Dr.Graef at t-online.de> wrote: > On 05/13/2012 02:46 AM, Keno Fischer wrote: > > Currently, there's a regression in llvm-config in both the 3.1 Release > > bra...

On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Henrik Bach wrote: > >> Here is my first try to document, how to build the llvm suite for MinGW. > > The GettingStarted patch looks fine to me, and I've applied it here: > http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20050207/023986.html > > The other patch does not look ok. In particular,