search for: libatla

...ource atlas > cd atlas-3.* > # less debian/README.Debian # read the docs - it's short > # sudo apt-get build-dep atlas # <- you may need this if you don't have > all tools installed > fakeroot debian/rules custom > > That will give you (after a long while) a bunch of libatlas*.deb files > that you can easily install with sudo dpkg -i > > I tried following these instructions with ATLAS 3.8.4-8 on Ubuntu 12.04, got the .deb files, but I get conflicts with libblas3gf (see below), any ideas? Thanks, Gad $ sudo dpkg -i *.deb dpkg: regarding libatlas3-base_3.8.4-8...

...39;s told "It's not your night, kid", except for me it has been the last two months trying to debug memory problems. Now I can't even install an old version of this package on a netbook running the Ubuntu 10.10 netbook remix because it can't find the libraries libf77blas and libatlas. I have even gone to the extent of removing the r-base-core package entirely and removing libatlas3gf-base then reinstalling everything. I still get bates at eeek:/var/tmp$ R CMD INSTALL lme4_0.999375-37.tar.gz * installing to library ?/home/bates/R/i686-pc-linux-gnu-library/2.12? * installing...

I thought I would try compiling R this time with the ATLAS libraries. I have compiled ATLAS and I have the following libraries: libatlas.a libf77blas.a libptcblas.a libtstatlas.a libcblas.a liblapack.a libptf77blas.a Is it sufficient to use ' --with-blas=libatlas.a ' when configuring or do I need to specify any of the other libraries as well? -- William D. McCoy Geosciences University of Massachuset...

...pack-dev r-base-dev | | [ Snip again ... ] | | (for non-francophones : "The following packages will be REMOVED : ..."). | | However, atlas3-base *is* currently installed, and I never had problems | recompiling packages. Quick guess: you have the old atlas-* packages instead of the new libatlas-* packages. Try $ sudo apt-get install libatlas3gf-base libatlas-base-dev | So, my (first) question is : what would be the benefits of installing | atlas3-base-dev ? Isn't that necessary for recompiling packages ? [Make that libatlas-base-dev] So that you can compile against Atlas and ge...

...u do _not_ have a depends on Rlapack.so. ....": [ 47 ] <wow> (ron) ldd /usr/lib/R/bin/exec/R linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00533000) libR.so => /usr/lib/libR.so (0x0073e000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00110000) libf77blas.so.3gf => /usr/lib/libf77blas.so.3gf (0x00ed4000) libatlas.so.3gf => /usr/lib/libatlas.so.3gf (0x0026e000) libgfortran.so.3 => /usr/lib/libgfortran.so.3 (0x00cca000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x0065f000) libreadline.so.6 => /lib/libreadline.so.6 (0x00534000) libpcre.so.3 => /lib/libpcre.so.3 (0x00f5b000) liblzma.so.2 => /usr/lib/...

...pends on Rlapack.so. ....": [ 47 ] <wow> (ron) ldd /usr/lib/R/bin/exec/R linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00533000) libR.so => /usr/lib/libR.so (0x0073e000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00110000) libf77blas.so.3gf => /usr/lib/libf77blas.so.3gf (0x00ed4000) libatlas.so.3gf => /usr/lib/libatlas.so.3gf (0x0026e000) libgfortran.so.3 => /usr/lib/libgfortran.so.3 (0x00cca000) libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x0065f000) libreadline.so.6 => /lib/libreadline.so.6 (0x00534000) libpcre.so.3 => /lib/libpcre.so.3 (0x00f5b000) liblzma....

I just upgraded to Ubuntu 8.10 (i386) from 8.04. After the upgrade, I ran update.packages(.libPaths()[1]) in R to get the packages installed from source up to date too. Unfortunately, two packages could not be updated: mclust and mboost. In both cases, the error I got mentioned lf77blas. Here's the output for mboost: * Installing *source* package 'mboost' ... ** libs gcc -std=gnu99

Hi, Since upgrading to version 2.11.0~20100402-1, starting R fails with: /usr/lib64/R/bin/exec/R: error while loading shared libraries: libblas.so.3gf: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Is this occurring to others on sid? -- Seb

...t's short | # sudo apt-get build-dep atlas # <- you may need this if you don't have all tools installed | fakeroot debian/rules custom "Yes but." Someone should write an atlas-helper package that deals with this and ... | That will give you (after a long while) a bunch of libatlas*.deb files that you can easily install with sudo dpkg -i | | Now if you simply configure R --with-blas --with-lapack it will work, and you'll get a nice and fast BLAS, but unfortunately it will be single-threaded: | | > m=matrix(rnorm(4e6),2e3) | > system.time(tcrossprod(m)) | user...

...<rwhaley@cs.utk.edu> cc: help-octave@bevo.che.wisc.edu Subject: Re: ATLAS and octave Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 03:05:13 -0600 (CST) Here is all I did to build a copy of Octave that uses ATLAS: 1. build ATLAS 2. merge all four of the libraries that the ATLAS build creates into a single libatlas.a and install it in /some/dir. 3. relink Octave by running make SPECIAL_MATH_LIB=/some/dir/libatlas.a That seems to be all that is needed. Would it be possible to modify the ATLAS makefiles to just build a libatlas.a? Then Octave could simply have AC_CHECK_LIB(atlas, ATL_xerbla)...

...at R-project.org ## configure: WARNING: ## ----------------------------------- ## ...the command line item I pass to configure is this: feta:R-2.7.0> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-x --without-R-framework --without-aqua --with-blas="/usr/local/lib/libptf77blas.a /usr/local/lib/libatlas.a" --with-lapack="/usr/local/lib/liblapack.a /usr/local/lib/libptf77blas.a /usr/local/lib/libatlas.a" CFLAGS="-maltivec -mabi=altivec -mtune=970 -faltivec -O3" CXXFLAGS="-maltivec -mabi=altivec -mtune=970 -faltivec -O3" ...the rest of configure completes fine, t...

...R-1.5.1 R-admin manual states : "This is currently not supported. The problem is that SIGINT signals will not be handled properly when sent during a multi-threaded ATLAS computation, and this may result in a segmentation fault". Does this mean that I should avoid the --with-blas=/usr/lib/libatlas.a option for ./configure ? Agus Thanks Dr. Agustin Lobo Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra (CSIC) Lluis Sole Sabaris s/n 08028 Barcelona SPAIN tel 34 93409 5410 fax 34 93411 0012 alobo at ija.csic.es -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mail...

Hi, I'm using Ubuntu Hardy i386, and the R 2.7.1 Ubuntu packages from CRAN. The CRAN r-base-dev package depends on refblas3-dev or atlas3-base-dev, but octave3.0-headers depends on libblas-dev. The two blas packages seem to conflict, so r-base-dev and octave3.0-headers can't be installed together. Is this a known issue? Thanks, Gad $ sudo apt-get install octave3.0-headers Reading

...could not find the presentation of R Bivand on this... Any other references on this question? Secondly, I am a little bit confused about how this is done on Ubuntu. First of all.... I am not sure of which BLAS is actually being used... a dpkg -l indicated me that both liblas (-dev and 3gf) and libatlas (3gf-base) are installed... Doing: $ ls -n /usr/lib/R/lib/ total 2528 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 2583076 2011-02-26 04:21 libR.so I don't see which one is used actually... how can I figure out? Thanks! Matthieu

...busta at temisto:~$ dpkg -l | grep lapack ii lapack3 3.0.20000531a-6.1ubuntu1 ii liblapack-dev 3.1.1-0.3ubuntu2 ii liblapack3gf 3.1.1-0.3ubuntu2 busta at temisto:~$ dpkg -l | grep atlas ii atlas3-base 3.6.0-20.6 ii libatlas-base-dev 3.6.0-21.1ubuntu3 ii libatlas-headers 3.6.0-21.1ubuntu3 ii libatlas3gf-base 3.6.0-21.1ubuntu3 --- R CMD config BLAS_LIBS -lblas R CMD...

Dirk suggested I move this thread over here. I am trying to get a multithreaded (multi CPU) version of ATLAS working with R, and have been unable, thus far, to get it working. Has anyone gotten an multithreaded version of ATLAS working on Debian (64 bit)? I've tried this: apt-get source atlas -t unstable cd atlas-3.8.3 DEFAULTS=n fakeroot debian/rules custom but it is APPEARING to only

...'apt-get install atlas3-base' for basic tuned Atlas, or 'apt-get install atlas3-sse2' assuming that sse2 is the closest fit to the cpu in question. </quote> However, while atlas3-base is available in Lenny/Testing, none of the architecture-dependent extensions are. I did find libatlas3gf-*, is this the same thing? The information I found in the R Admin manual seems to apply only to building R yourself, so I'm not sure what to do with the precompiled version from the repository. Is it as simple as: apt-get install libatlas3gf-sse2 And is there anything else that needs doi...

Dear All, Summary: ======== To test some packages, I want to build R-3.1.0 (current R devel). However, when I use the default libblas, make check fails with running code in 'reg-BLAS.R' ...make[3]: *** [reg-BLAS.Rout] Error 1 It does not fail, however, if I use libatlas3 or libopenblas. The same thing happens with the current R patched. I've google around and cannot find anything, and I find it very surprising that make check fails here. Details: ======== - I have checked this with R-devel from 19 December and 26 December, as well as with the current...

On two laptops running 32-bit kubuntu, I have found that svd(), invoked within R 2.9.1 as supplied with the current ubuntu package, returns very incorrect results when presented with complex-valued input. One of the laptops is a Dell D620, the other a MacBook Pro. I've also verified the problem on a 32-bit desktop. On these same systems, R compiled from source provides apparently

...ring but on cinnamon mint olivia 15. I read dirk's gcbd paper from a couple of years ago. it suggests that stock blas is pretty bad compared to the four main alternatives. of course, dirk also maintains the binaries for debian/ubuntu R, so he probably knows the answer off hand. I installed libatlas3-base (3.8.4-9ubuntu1) from the software repositories. ldd tells me that this is not enough ( ldd /usr/lib/R/bin/exec/R | grep -i atlas). libatlas use is not determined at compile time. I also redownloaded the 'r-base' binary to check whether it is determined at download time. this di...