search for: li2

Hello, I have 2 navigations ( mainnav and subnav ) with 2 lists List have same names ( li0 li1 li2 ) What is the best way to select li1 of subnav with prototype 1.4 in this case ? I just want to hide/show it Thanks <div id="mainnav"> <ul> <li name="li0"><li name="li1"><li name="li2"> </ul> </div> <div id=&q...

...and some concept about PassManager. Basically I want to keep LoopInfo analysis result alive. Here is an example showing the problem I encountered, assuming I already addRequired<llvm::LoopInfo>() in getAnalysisUsage: void foo(llvm::Function *F1, llvm::Function *F2) { llvm::LoopInfo *LI1, LI2; LI1 = &getAnalysis<llvm::LoopInfo>(*F1); llvm::Loop* L1 = LI1->getLoopFor(F1->begin()); LI2 = &getAnalysis<llvm::LoopInfo>(*F2); llvm::Loop* L2 = LI2->getLoopFor(F2->begin()); L1->dump(); // crash L2->dump(); } I checked why this program crashe...

...t about PassManager. Basically I want to keep LoopInfo analysis result alive. Here is an example showing the problem I encountered, assuming I already addRequired<llvm::LoopInfo>() in getAnalysisUsage: > > void foo(llvm::Function *F1, llvm::Function *F2) { > llvm::LoopInfo *LI1, LI2; > LI1 =&getAnalysis<llvm::LoopInfo>(*F1); > llvm::Loop* L1 = LI1->getLoopFor(F1->begin()); > LI2 =&getAnalysis<llvm::LoopInfo>(*F2); > llvm::Loop* L2 = LI2->getLoopFor(F2->begin()); > L1->dump(); // crash > L2->dump(); > } &g...

...want something like this: LiveIntervals *li_ = &getAnalysis<LiveIntervals>(); for (LiveIntervals::iterator liItr = li_->begin(), liEnd = li_->end(); liItr != liEnd; ++liItr) { LiveInterval *li = liItr->second; if (li->empty()) continue; for (LiveIntervals::iterator li2Itr = llvm::next(liItr); li2Itr != liEnd; ++liItr) { LiveInterval *li2 = li2Itr->second; if (li2->empty()) continue; if (li->overlaps(*li2)) { // li->reg interferes with li2->reg. // Handle this however you need to. } } } Cheers, Lang. On Fri, M...

...Manager. Basically I want to keep LoopInfo analysis result alive. Here is an example showing the problem I encountered, assuming I already addRequired<llvm::LoopInfo>() in getAnalysisUsage: >> >> void foo(llvm::Function *F1, llvm::Function *F2) { >> llvm::LoopInfo *LI1, LI2; >> LI1 = &getAnalysis<llvm::LoopInfo>(*F1); >> llvm::Loop* L1 = LI1->getLoopFor(F1->begin()); >> LI2 = &getAnalysis<llvm::LoopInfo>(*F2); >> llvm::Loop* L2 = LI2->getLoopFor(F2->begin()); >> L1->dump(); // crash >>...

...amp;DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(); Result2.reset(new ScopDetection(F, DT, SE, LI, RI, AA)); auto &SD2 = getAnalysis<polly::ScopDetectionWrapperPass>().getSD(); auto &SE2 = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE(); auto &LI2 = getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo(); auto &AA2 = getAnalysis<AAResultsWrapperPass>().getAAResults(); auto const &DL2 = F.getParent()->getDataLayout(); auto &DT2 = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(); auto &AC2 = getAnalysi...

Hello, I need to analyze dependencies in my llvm ir by using polly. i created a new pass called mypass there i added polly dependency analysis pass but when i execute this pass in gdb i get no data. Why is that so? My code is follows; namespace { struct mypass : public FunctionPass { static char ID; mypass() : FunctionPass(ID) { } virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) {

...ically I want to keep LoopInfo analysis result alive. Here is an example showing the problem I encountered, assuming I already addRequired<llvm::LoopInfo>() in getAnalysisUsage: >>> >>> void foo(llvm::Function *F1, llvm::Function *F2) { >>> llvm::LoopInfo *LI1, LI2; >>> LI1 =&getAnalysis<llvm::LoopInfo>(*F1); >>> llvm::Loop* L1 = LI1->getLoopFor(F1->begin()); >>> LI2 =&getAnalysis<llvm::LoopInfo>(*F2); >>> llvm::Loop* L2 = LI2->getLoopFor(F2->begin()); >>> L1->dump(); /...

...Pass>().getDomTree(); > Result2.reset(new ScopDetection(F, DT, SE, LI, RI, AA)); > > > > auto &SD2 = getAnalysis<polly::ScopDetectionWrapperPass>().getSD(); > > > > auto &SE2 = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE(); > auto &LI2 = getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo(); > auto &AA2 = getAnalysis<AAResultsWrapperPass>().getAAResults(); > auto const &DL2 = F.getParent()->getDataLayout(); > auto &DT2 = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(); > auto &...

...nt,int,int,void*,void*,...) I'm trying to pass the dereferenced pointer's memory address and the address of the location who are in alias set of the pointer. For this i'm using BitCastInst BitCastInst *init1= new BitCastInst(arg1,PointerType::getInt8PtrTy(Context),"bitcast",li2); But every time i have a dereferenced pointer inside a for loop I get an Instruction does not dominate all uses error. Instruction does not dominate all uses! %9 = load i32** %x2, align 4 %bitcast6 = bitcast i32* %9 to i8* Instruction does not dominate all uses! %bitcast5 = bitcast i32* %7...

...uto &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(); Result2.reset(new ScopDetection(F, DT, SE, LI, RI, AA)); auto &SD2 = getAnalysis<polly::ScopDetectionWrapperPass>().getSD(); auto &SE2 = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolutionWrapperPass>().getSE(); auto &LI2 = getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo(); auto &AA2 = getAnalysis<AAResultsWrapperPass>().getAAResults(); auto const &DL2 = F.getParent()->getDataLayout(); auto &DT2 = getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(); auto &AC2 = getAnalysi...

How do you compile the code? Within the Polly subdirectory using CMake? How do you run your pass. Using "opt -mypass inputfile.ll"? Michael 2018-01-28 9:30 GMT-06:00 hameeza ahmed via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hello, > > I need to analyze dependencies in my llvm ir by using polly. i created a new > pass called mypass there i added polly dependency

I am looking for examples of code that demonstrates the fine tuning of the strip panels in lattice graphics and uses plotmath characters. The code for the graphic is as follows: xyplot(lagy ~ n | rho1 * rho2, data= data, layout=c(2,6), span = 1, xlab = "Sample Size", ylab = "Bias in the Coefficient for the Lag of X", type = "o") rho1 is a four level factor

Hello, I have a question with password never expired flag during changing password. If X flag for password never expired has been set in account flags for a user, password change would cause to lose the X flags. By taking a look at the code of the line 993 in passdb/passdb.c, it said all other acb flags will be inherited from current existing account ctrl bit, except for

Hi, Recently, upgrade samba from 3.0.14a to 3.0.23pre1. And found trusted domain user couldn't logon to Samba share. The command nsquery to query a user from trusted domain failed also. For example: parent.com Win2003 DC |---Child1.parent.com Win2003 DC |---Child2.parent.com Win2003 DC Kinit OK. Net ads join to Child1 OK. Restart the server with winbindd. Wbinfo -m can display trusted

Hello, When running net rpc trustdom establish command for PDC trusts, I got the following error with a core dump in 3.0.21c, on HP-UX and 3.0.21c-7.1.5-SUSE-SL10.0. Couldn't connect to domain MY_DOM controller. Error was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. bt #0 0xc016f4d4 in memset () from /usr/lib/libc.2 #1 0x89ab8 in cli_send_trans () #2 0x83b0c in cli_api () #3 0x9715c in cli_get_pdc_name () #4

Hello, When the option "ldap passwd sync = yes" was used in smb.conf, we got an error with "Unknown format" on ber_prinf(ber, "N}" in passdb/pdb_ldap.c for Netscape LDAP SDK. This would block password change. By checking Openldap manpage at http://www.openldap.org/software/man.cgi?query=ber_printf&apropos=0&sekt

I ran into a problem on idmap backend. In previous Samba releases, there are two kinds of scenarios on idmap backend. 1) No explicit idmap backend option presented in smb.conf. But imply using default tdb idmap backend idmap uid = low - high idmap gid = low - high 2) idmap backend option exists in smb.conf idmap uid = low - high idmap gid = low - high idmap backend = tdb [or

Hello, We are experiencing ADS lower performance on Samba-3.0.22 for HPUX. I did Google search, and find out one message posted at http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-November/114231.html at the earlier time. >From my observation, it seems there was a spin on reply_spnego_negotiate()/ reply_spnego_kerberos() calls that invokes register_vuid() to register uvid with different vuid# for a

Hello, We are running into the problem in slower performance on oplock. Here is the oplock scenario. - We are using 3.0.22. - Kernel oplock has been implemented on hp-ux 11v3. - smb.conf kernel oplocks = Yes oplock break wait time = 0 fake oplocks = No locking = Yes oplocks = Yes level2 oplocks = Yes oplock contention limit = 2