search for: lexicons

Hi, I'm trying to write a general-purpose "lexicon" class and associated methods for storing and accessing information about large numbers of specific words (e.g., their frequencies in different genres). Crucial to making such a class practically useful is to get hashing working correctly so that information about specific words can be accessed quickly. But I've never really

I have a Lexicon model, and I want user to be able to create dynamic feature to every lexicon. And I have a complicate search interface that let user search on every single feature (including the dynamic ones) belonged to Lexicon model. I could have used a serialized text field to save all the dynamic information if they are not for searching. In case I want to let user search on all fields, I

Greetings all, I have been looking into using Xapian to provide search for email. I have to be very careful about indexing overhead, and I notice that several of the tables use term strings as part of the key or data. I was wondering if there is a performance or complexity reason for not having a separate table mapping term strings to unique numbers, which could then be used in the

On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Originally, the distinguishing feature of "primitive" types was that they were enumerable and not parameterized on anything. Right. > Then we moved to arbitrary bit-width integers types to generalize things significantly (the right move IMO). Right. > Thus, integers were no longer

On Dec 6, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> What purpose does the notion of "primitive" types serve anymore? Why don't we just abolish that from the lexicon and from the code? > > Hi Chris, > > The attached patch removes it from Type.h and updates the last users. > Is that what you were looking for? Yep, LGTM.

Hello, First I wanted to say thanks for a great piece of software, thanks Olly and others who've contributed! I know that Xapian supports right-truncating, if that's the proper name for wildcard support, as in a search for "xapia*". I don't believe Xapian supports wildcards on both sides of a term, correct? Is this something that is technically unfeasable, unpalatable

...then goto 10 end if end do 10 continue return end ####### end of fortran code ####### start of R code strings <- c("donald duck", "When trying to express oneself, it's frankly quite absurd, To leaf through lengthy lexicons to find the perfect word. A little spontaniaty keeps conversation keen, You need to find a way to say, precisely what you mean... Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious! Even though the sound of it is something quite atrosicous! If you say it loud enough, you'll always sound precocious",...

On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:59 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, heisenbug wrote: > > What about "inventing" pseudo-constants (which point to the right > > thing) and build the piece of IR with them. When done, grab mutex and > > RAUW it in. Alternatively, submit to a privileged thread that performs > > the RAUW. > > The trick is to

LLVM Weekly - #57, Feb 2nd 2015 =============================== If you prefer, you can read a HTML version of this email at <http://llvmweekly.org/issue/57>. Welcome to the fifty-seventh issue of LLVM Weekly, a weekly newsletter (published every Monday) covering developments in LLVM, Clang, and related projects. LLVM Weekly is brought to you by [Alex Bradbury](http://asbradbury.org).

> What purpose does the notion of "primitive" types serve anymore? Why don't we just abolish that from the lexicon and from the code? Hi Chris, The attached patch removes it from Type.h and updates the last users. Is that what you were looking for? Cheers, Rafael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: t.patch Type:

On 7 December 2013 12:55, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Dec 6, 2013, at 6:37 PM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> What purpose does the notion of "primitive" types serve anymore? Why don't we just abolish that from the lexicon and from the code? >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> The attached

Dear List, What is the way in R to plot a graph having date time (e.g. format 12/31/2002 13:12) in the x axis and numerical value (e.g. temperature) on the Y-axis ? I could not get 'plot()' to do this as X axis values are non-numeric. 'bwplot()' sorts the date values and thereby changes the order of the dates and of Y. The date/time values have to be shown on the X-axis as tick

Dear All, First, we're pushing back the creation of the release branch until tonight. This means two things: 1. If you want something to go into LLVM 1.5, you have until I create the release branch to get it in. I am tentatively scheduling this for 5:00 pm today (CST). 2. If you don't want something to go into LLVM 1.5, please refrain from adding it until I create the release

All, I''m new to Ruby so please excuse me if this issue has been addressed. My question pertains to performing image drag-n-drop event sinkings that fire off remote asynchronous server calls. Has anyone gotten this to work? If so, can you point me in a direction to obtain some sample code/on-line resources. Much Thanks Chris Alexander Senior Software Engineer Lexicon Pharmaceuticals,

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Craig Topper" <craig.topper at gmail.com> > To: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 2:29:50 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Random question about the x86 backend (and backends in general I suppose)

Hi everyone, This Fall has been busy, busy, busy. In addition to the usual LLVM hacking, our developers have been moving all over the country, starting classes, ending internships, getting married, and traveling the world. Despite all of the non-LLVM fun we've been having, we've managed to get some work done, too. :) Here is my traditional distillation of llvm-commits: New High-Level

Hi, I am a graduate student in computer science.I have taken a programming languages course this semester and I am having great fun building interpreters.I am planning to build toy compilers in the winter.I would love to participate in GSOC 2016 contributing to LLVM.Could anyone let me know desirable skills should be developed to contribute to LLVM ? Also I would like to know the open projects

Readers of this list might be interested in the following commenta about R. In a recent report, by Michael N. Mitchell http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/technicalreports/ says about R: "Perhaps the most notable exception to this discussion is R, a language for statistical computing and graphics. R is free to download under the terms of the GNU General Public License (see http://www.r-project.

Hello Doug, *putting llvmdev in copy since they are concerned too* I've finally got around to finish a working implementation of the typical Levenshtein Distance with the diagonal optimization. I've tested it against the original llvm implementation and checked it on a set of ~18k by randomly generating a variation of each word and checking that both implementations would return the

Originally, the distinguishing feature of "primitive" types was that they were enumerable and not parameterized on anything. Then we moved to arbitrary bit-width integers types to generalize things significantly (the right move IMO). Thus, integers were no longer technically primitive types, and their categorization in code has changed to reflect this. But that doesn't make *any