search for: lennarts

Hi all, Five minutes ago I heard a rumor that Lennart Poettering has rewritten rsync. My top urgency is to download the latest numbered version of rsync untouched by Lennart Poettering: I'll find out if the rumor is true or false later. I've downloaded rsync rsync-3.1.3.tar.gz and rsync-patches-3.1.3.tar.gz from https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/ . Is the source code in both those

Hello, I am currently trying to connect my Dovecot mail server to Microsoft's Azure-AD and use it as password and user database. I am using version 2.3.7.1. Using the Azure-AD as passdb already works. In this context I noticed that the scope implementation is not yet merged. Since I haven't found any hints for an OAuth2 userdb implementation yet, I wanted to ask if there are any plans

Hi, Is there some documentation about what has not been implemented yet? I'm trying to use vectors and I just run into one thing after another that seem to be missing. (I.e., fcmp on vectors doesn't work; trying to do the same thing with expanded instructions doesn't work; select on a vector doesn't work) -- Lennart

Hi! Dovecot supports Lua userdb, which can be used to implement custom user databases, maybe this might work for you? See https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/lua_based_authentication for more details. Aki > On 15/08/2019 12:16 Lennart Boettcher <lennart.boettcher at secpoint.onmicrosoft.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > Thank you for the quick

Hi, I am writing C++ functions that are to be called via .Call() interface. I'd been using error() (from R.h) to return to R if there is an error, but then I realized that this might be not safe as supposedly error() doesn't throw an exception and therefore some destructors do not get called and some memory may leak. Here is a simple example extern "C" void foo() { string

FYI. Does Dovecot implement BODYSTRUCTURE? An eval copy of Mulberry can be downloaded from <http://www.cyrusoft.com/mulberry/>. ------------ Forwarded Message ------------ Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:56 PM +0100 From: Lennart Petersson <lennart at informatik.gu.se> To: mulberry-discuss at cyrusoft.com Subject: Dovecot and Mulberry I've recently changed my imap-server

I'm using configure. On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:12 AM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> writes: > >> Commenting out the Hello transformation I get these link errors: >> >> llvm[2]: Linking Debug Shared Library LTO.dll >>

On Jan 24, 2009, at 4:34 AM, Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there some documentation about what has not been implemented yet? I've started adding notes to docs/LangRef.html Historically this document has been used to describe just the LLVM IR, and not what specific consumers of it do or don't support, but codegen is a very

Commenting out the Hello transformation I get these link errors: llvm[2]: Linking Debug Shared Library LTO.dll c:/DOCUME~1/1312888/Desktop/Workspace/llvm/llvm-top/Debug/lib/libLLVMSystem.a(Signals.o): In function `Z28LLVMUnhandledExceptionFilterP19_EXCEPTION_POINTERS': c:/DOCUME~1/1312888/Desktop/Workspace/llvm/llvm-top/lib/System/Win32/Signals.inc:164: undefined reference to

Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> writes: > Commenting out the Hello transformation I get these link errors: > > llvm[2]: Linking Debug Shared Library LTO.dll > c:/DOCUME~1/1312888/Desktop/Workspace/llvm/llvm-top/Debug/lib/libLLVMSystem.a(Signals.o): > In function `Z28LLVMUnhandledExceptionFilterP19_EXCEPTION_POINTERS': >

I feel like I'm going totally crazy. Is it just me, or have embedded From_ lines really been breaking mbox messages since (at least) dovecot 1.0? I found a whole lot of broken messages in an old mailbox of mine and when I looked closer at it, it seemed like Dovecot was ignoring the Content-Length header and truncating the messages at the first embedded From_ line instead. Figuring

Like this: llvm[1]: Compiling Signals.cpp for Debug build In file included from Signals.cpp:33: Win32/Signals.inc:262: error: `sys' has not been declared Win32/Signals.inc: In function `void AddSignalHandler(void (*)(void*), void*)': Win32/Signals.inc:266: error: `KillSigs' was not declared in this scope Win32/Signals.inc:266: error: `KillSigsEnd' was not declared in this scope

We are trying to compile and run the ttest.c example that comes with R (in C:\Program Files\R\rw1081\src\library\windlgs\src\ttest.c). After compiling it with MS Visual C++ we load the DLL with dyn.load. So far it seems good, but when we try to call it from R (after running C:\Program Files\R\rw1081\src\library\windlgs\R\windlgs.R) R crashes. We have tried changing the exports from DLL but have

I have been lurking in this list a while and searching in the archives to find out how one learns to write fast R code. One solution seems to be to write part of the code not in R but in C. However after finding a benchmark article (http://www.sciviews.org/other/benchmark.htm) I have been more interested in making the R code itself more efficient. I would like to find more info about this. I have

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5075 Summary: Syncing with --iconv may yield protocol error Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: lennart.samba@lovstrand.com

On Thu, July 23, 2015 13:19, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Physically dragging the thread back on topic... > > I really am going crazy, trying to deal with the hourly logs from the > loghost. We've got 170+ servers and workstations... but a *very* large > percentage of what's showing up is from his bloody new fedora 22, with > its idiot systemd logging of *ever* selinux

On Mar 8, 2009, at 4:21 AM, Lennart Augustsson wrote: > Like this: > > llvm[1]: Compiling Signals.cpp for Debug build > In file included from Signals.cpp:33: > Win32/Signals.inc:262: error: `sys' has not been declared > Win32/Signals.inc: In function `void AddSignalHandler(void (*) > (void*), void*)': > Win32/Signals.inc:266: error: `KillSigs' was not declared

Lennart Augustsson mentioned on his blog that he got substantial performance improvements by conveying to LLVM when external functions (e.g. tanh) were pure. How is this done? -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e

On Tuesday 17 February 2009 09:46:07 Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi, > > > Lennart Augustsson mentioned on his blog that he got substantial > > performance improvements by conveying to LLVM when external functions > > (e.g. tanh) were pure. > > first note that tanh is not pure, because the result depends on the current > floating point rounding mode. Ugh. > However,

I'm trying to compile the top version of LLVM with MinGW, but I'm getting compilation errors. They seem to be caused by the changes in rev 66072. Has anyone compiled on MinGW? Since I just installed MinGW on this computer it could be my problem. (I noticed that LLVM 2.5 still doesn't come with binaries for the libraries on MinGW.) -- Lennarft