search for: lenience

...ty IDs 1054956, 1054957 Coverity pointed out that we applying array operations based on an expression which yielded singleton pointers. The problem is actually that the externs were typed incorrectly. Correct the extern declaration to prevent straying into undefined behaviour, and relying on the lenience of GCC to work. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> --- xen/common/kernel.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/common/kernel.c b/xen/common/kerne...

Another point of disparity between how I see others write Puppet manifests and the Best Practice that I''ve adopted at my institution is the use of quoting. In Puppet, you can get away with not quoting values or references if there isn''t a special character or a keyword being used (e.g. package { openssh: ...} or User[agirl]). However, even though that is possible, to make

Hi everybody, recently I had to teach a course on Cox model, of which I am not a specialist, to an audience of medical epidemiologists. Not a good idea you might say.. anyway, someone in the audience was very hostile. At some point, he sayed that Cox model was useless, since all you have to do is count who dies and who survives, divide by the sample sizes and compute a relative risk, and if there

On 31 July 2015 at 17:47, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > After re-reading your last couple emails with the benefit of sleep, that all makes sense to me. The user/driver would be responsible for ensuring each tool is called with the same options, while each tool is responsible for using the same TargetTuple in all its calls to LLVM. The only bit I'm unsure about

After re-reading your last couple emails with the benefit of sleep, that all makes sense to me. The user/driver would be responsible for ensuring each tool is called with the same options, while each tool is responsible for using the same TargetTuple in all its calls to LLVM. The only bit I'm unsure about w.r.t to not having a serialization in the IR is the ModuleLinker where we currently have

On 30 July 2015 at 15:30, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > I haven't fully researched why the triple is there but one reason is to make backends target the same target as the frontends. Consider the case where clang is used to generate IR and then llc is used to compile it. We currently use the information in the IR to set the GNU triple, the target features,

Hello Dovecot users, Now that Dovecot v2.2.13 is released, I can release a new Pigeonhole. Due to changes in Dovecot, this Pigeonhole release will not compile cleanly against older Dovecot releases. This release is mainly about bugfixes. One notable addition is that I have updated the "vnd.dovecot.duplicate" extension to the new IETF draft "duplicate" extension. Changelog

Hello Dovecot users, Now that Dovecot v2.2.13 is released, I can release a new Pigeonhole. Due to changes in Dovecot, this Pigeonhole release will not compile cleanly against older Dovecot releases. This release is mainly about bugfixes. One notable addition is that I have updated the "vnd.dovecot.duplicate" extension to the new IETF draft "duplicate" extension. Changelog

Hi! I've (finally) decided to try and make my PowerWalker work with megatec_usb. So far it seems the agiler subdriver is the way to go, but it doesn't work. The initial detection process sometimes succeeds in 1 out of 5 "Q1" commands, but that's about it (which is better than what the krauler subdriver can do... absolutely nothing). So, what needs to be done to obtain more

...ion concerning passing arguments between apply and lapply? Or maybe, once my problem is explained, the question is really about how to best transform my nested for loops into list/matrix operations; I am just beginning this transformation away from nested for loops, so I beg of you to have some lenience regarding my ignorance. Part I: I used a set of nested for loops for a computation, which works as fine as it is slow--very slow. My needs are on the order of about 20000 iterations; in nested loop format this is millions of calculations. To give you a sense of what I'm trying to do, it may...

Yes, I realize this. That is why we are introducing the directors to the cluster. We are also working on doing Dovecot LDA/LMTP delivery, to improve Dovecot's ability to react to new messages. Currently we are dropping email directly into the Maildir through other facilities, which works -fine-. I realize however that IDLE is most likely not working properly with

Hi, Sorry for the late report but I've only just found these issues. Llvm.org isn't working for me at the moment but I'll file tickets once it is. The issues are: 1. Almabench has some significant numerical differences and fails the reference check for some configs. I'm investigating this one at the moment but early indications are that it's a similar (but different)

A new igt-gpu-tools release is available with the following changes: - Meson build options have been renamed. Please check the news options in meson_options.txt and make sure you don't get any warnings when configuring the project. (Simon Ser) - Compile-testing CI for MIPS. (Guillaume Tucker) - Various igt_runner reliability improvements (Petri Latvala & Arkadiusz Hiler) - Switched