search for: ldstr

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ldstr".

Did you mean: ldst
2011 Dec 02
5
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...%Y2 = fmul double %X2, %A2 > + %R = fmul double %Y1, %Y2 > + ret double %R > +; CHECK-RD3: @test1 > +; CHECK-RD2: @test1 > +; CHECK-RD3-NOT:<2 x double> > +; CHECK-RD2:<2 x double> What about sorting them by check prefix? > +++ b/test/Transforms/BBVectorize/simple-ldstr.ll > @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ > +target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" > +; RUN: opt< %s -bb-vectorize -bb-vectorize-req-chain-depth=3 -S | FileCheck %s &...
2011 Dec 14
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...fmul double %Y1, %Y2 > > + ret double %R > > +; CHECK-RD3: @test1 > > +; CHECK-RD2: @test1 > > +; CHECK-RD3-NOT:<2 x double> > > +; CHECK-RD2:<2 x double> > What about sorting them by check prefix? > > > +++ b/test/Transforms/BBVectorize/simple-ldstr.ll > > @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ > > +target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" > > +; RUN: opt< %s -bb-vectorize -bb-vectorize-req-chain-depth=3 -S |...
2011 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 21:22 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 11:55 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Tobias, > > > > I've attached an updated patch. It contains a few bug fixes and many > > (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments. > > > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...fmul double %Y1, %Y2 > > + ret double %R > > +; CHECK-RD3: @test1 > > +; CHECK-RD2: @test1 > > +; CHECK-RD3-NOT:<2 x double> > > +; CHECK-RD2:<2 x double> > What about sorting them by check prefix? > > > +++ b/test/Transforms/BBVectorize/simple-ldstr.ll > > @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ > > +target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" > > +; RUN: opt< %s -bb-vectorize -bb-vectorize-req-chain-depth=3 -S |...
2011 Nov 22
5
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 11:55 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > Tobias, > > I've attached an updated patch. It contains a few bug fixes and many > (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments. > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile > failure when compiling >