search for: lawsuits

Just curious if any of the Asterisk installers are doing anything special to protect themselves from a possible lawsuit caused by 911 failure during a Asterisk/computer crash? I realize that any traditional PBX or even a phone line can fail but, anything running on a computer is probably going to be less reliable than most PBXs. Anybody requiring customers to acknowledge and sign any kind of

I figured I''d post here before submitting a ticket, but I''m seeing some confusing stuff when dealing with YAML now. I was using it to freeze objects in my database, and so i had some data already around to mess with. I upgraded both Ruby (1.8.3 -> 1.8.4) and Rails ( -> 1.1RC1) and this junk started. I''ve outlined the problem in two pastes, which I''ll

...ies that have been using Linux. The article made the point that the ideas behind GPL are under attack precisely because no one is making sure that the code being put into the freely avail. packages isn't owned by someone else. Here's my question: Is R vulnerable in any way to the sorts of lawsuits that SCO is bringing against the Linux community? Thanks in advance, Greg __________________________________

...t updated without a restart..... was thinking I am doing something wrong, but maybe not now...... Chris -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Moore [mailto:moorejon@usd465.com] Sent: Thursday, 8 January 2004 8:42 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: 911 and lawsuits and redundancy Another concern I have on this front is that it seems like some updates require an asterisk restart rather than just issueing a reload command from the * console. This that correct, or I am just not running the system correctly? For instance it seems like I couldn't get zapata....

...rt when convenient" within asterisk, and it will do it's thing when all lines are clear.... -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Moore [mailto:moorejon@usd465.com] Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:31 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: 911 and lawsuits and redundancy Is there a way to reload a module from the console, so that we could isolate the amount of failure is necessary for these types of changes? For me this would be a pretty big improvement in reliability, although I may just see it that way because I am still figuring out configura...

...; On 6 Jan 2004, at 6:35 pm, asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com >> wrote: >> >> > Message: 7 >> > From: "Jim Flagg" <flaggj@comcast.net> >> > To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> >> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits and redundancy >> > Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:06:34 -0500 >> > Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Jonathan Moore" <moorejon@usd465.com> >> > To: <asterisk-users@lists.di...

I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm thinking tar, here, as "no games".) Is there

Hello everyone, Some months ago there were news about J2 filing lawsuits against companies using fax-to-email technology, as they claimed it was their patent. They had also won some cases, until someone filed a counter lawsuit against them based some other grounds but again related to fax-to-email. Anybody knows what is latest in this regard? Can now fax-to-email be us...

May be slightly off topic, but I was wondering what everyone thinks of this latest ruling against Vonage? Does anyone really know what Verizon hold patents for, and could those patents possible affect anything in Asterisk? Who knows who Verizon will go after next. Brent -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 07/16/2015 04:25 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been >> looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd >> like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found >> yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back

...rse not like this situation therefore we would like to ask you how you see the risks for the emergence of such a situation. More specifically: - Do you know of any patents that might be used against a Speex-based product? I assume that Speex is not violating any patents but regarding to US patent lawsuits everything is possible, the judges/jurys have litttle technical insight. - Are there any products on the market, selling in large quantities, that incorporate Speex? Best regards and thank you in advance, Erik W. Rasmussen Senior Research Engineer Technology Research GN Netcom A/S Lautrup...

Le 25/08/2019 ? 23:07, Stephen John Smoogen a ?crit?: > I have had several people explain to me that my comments were > out-of-place and out-of-turn. When I wrote them originally I thought I > was going from experience of previous releases and thought I was being > matter of fact. In rereading I realized I was crass and grumpy. My > un-reserved apologies for that. I should have

...> 6. Design a simple recognisable logo. > > How about a "LLVM Inside" logo like the Intel one. Another project 'TAL' > has used a smular looking logo :- > > http://www.cs.cornell.edu/talc/ It's not original, and we don't want any logo/trademark lawsuits from Intel. -- Misha Brukman :: http://misha.brukman.net :: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu

...lly solving this problem, then let me know Best, Ad. On 6 Jan 2004, at 6:35 pm, asterisk-users-request@lists.digium.com wrote: > Message: 7 > From: "Jim Flagg" <flaggj@comcast.net> > To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and lawsuits and redundancy > Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:06:34 -0500 > Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jonathan Moore" <moorejon@usd465.com> > To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:3...

I found this on CrossValidated: "A medical statistician once told me, that they use SAS because if they make mistakes due to software bugs and it comes to lawsuits, SAS will recompensate them. R comes without warranty." Kjetil

...urse not like this situation therefore we would like to ask you how you see the risks for the emergence of such a situation. More specifically: - Do you know of any patents that might be used against a Speex-based product? I assume that Speex is not violating any patents but regarding to US patent lawsuits everything is possible, the judges/jurys have litttle technical insight. - Are there any products on the market, selling in large quantities, that incorporate Speex? Best regards and thank you in advance, Erik W. Rasmussen Senior Research Engineer Technology Research GN Netcom A/S Lautrupbjerg...

From: Dag Wieers > Sorry to interrupt but he was describing how you appeared in previous > postings. And I have to say that I felt the same way reading some of your postings. Really? Then I'll re-read them since there's been a second confirmation. Just know that I wasn't trying to make it about good/bad. I'm just trying to make the point that companies aren't just

i think that if a distribution with MS WOS XP and 7 look and feel based on Gnome and Ubuntu or debian is released a lot of people would migrate. People is comdortable with what they know, even Gnome is easy to use, they like Control panel, Documents and Settings and Start vuttons from MS WOS. If program Icons should be in desktops, an start button with a control panel, My documents and so one,

Sprint Nextel is sueing vonage, voiceglo and theglobe.com for infringing on VoIP patents. Sprint Nextel claims to have about 100 patents on VoIP technologies. Does anyone know which ones this article is talking about, and if so does asterisk have any of those features? The reason I am asking is that the article is vague, Vonage uses a fairly standard codec set, I dont know about the others.

Hello ! I'm very interested in btrfs development and I have general questions about it. Please accept my apologizes if they are dumb as I'm new to this area, and I just want to learn.. 1. Like the btrfs name implies (b-trees fs..) I guess that it works basically like WAFL (and ZFS), is that right ? 2. Are there any big differences between btrfs-wafl-zfs or only small ones ? 3. NetApp