search for: latterly

Hi, Am 21.10.2016 um 18:10 schrieb William Dunlap: > Are you saying that > f1 <- function(x) log(x) > f2 <- function(x) { log } (x) > should act differently? yes. Or more precisely: I would expect that. "Should" implies, that I want to change something. I just want to understand the behavior (or file a bug, if this would have been one). As I wrote, in e.g.

Hi, I was building LLVM with gcc 6.1.1 recently and it was spitting out some warnings relating to misleading indention that caught my eye. This wasn't a fresh build so I may have missed some. I've CC'ed the authors of the potentially misleading lines so they can decide what do about the warnings (if anything). I'm wondering if clang-format is making some inappropriate choices

Hi, Thanks for the quick answer! On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Thomas.Rucker at tieto.com wrote: > To your problem there are two approaches: > - bind explicitly to :: and to 0.0.0.0 (so an ipv4 and a separate ipv6 bind) > - change your sysctl.conf to contain: "net.ipv6.bindv6only = 0" hmmm. OK but this implies (does it not) that /proc/sys/net/ipv6/bindv6only should now contain

Hi! Is there any way to test if R is running on a Mac? I usually use value of .Platform$OS.type for windows or unix, but Mac falls in the latter group. Thanks, Gregor

On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:34 AM Markus Lavin <markus.lavin at ericsson.com> wrote: > To be more specific I am trying to use LVI from inside BasicAA to improve > some cases that turned out to be relevant for our downstream target. > > > > The code is in https://reviews.llvm.org/D55107 and I have problems with a > failing assert in the LazyValueInfoWrapperPass destructor

Ok, I have a challenge - get two services working over a single port. (!) Sometimes it's a web service, sometimes it's a VNC service. Here's what I had in mind: 1) Server is normally a webserver listening on port 80, and normally has the following rules active: # iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE 2)

Dear R-users, If you use the exact Wilcoxon test in the coin package, I would like make you aware of that SPSS/StatXact MAY perform a round-off before doing their exact Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (if you ever are unlucky enough not to use R). I have data from two treatments and was surprised to find that SPSS (15 under Windows) and R differed in their p-values (0.167 resp. 0.172). It turns out

> I don't see how this is a meaningful distinction in LLVM IR. In LLVM IR we only have SSA values. An SSA value could be an alloca, or a gep into an alloca, or spilled onto the stack at the MIR level, in which case the dbg.value should get lowered into a memory location (if it isn't explicitly a DW_OP_stack_value). I think the distinction is still important; even at the IR level, if we

Hi Sorry to ask such a basic question. I have a list, each element of which is a vector of two values. What I actually want is a matrix with two columns, and one row per element of the list. Obviously I have tried as.matrix(), and as.vector() but I didn't expect the latter to work. I feel so lame asking this. Any suggestions? Mick

Using the IRanges package from Bioconductor and somewhat recent R-2.9.1. ov = IRanges(1:3, 4:6) length(ov) # 3 seq(along = ov) # 1 2 3 as wanted seq_along(ov) # 1! I had expected that the last line would yield 1:3. My guess is that somehow seq_along don't utilize that ov is an S4 class with a length method. The last line of the *Details* section of ?seq has a typeo. Currently it is

On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:55 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > It depends a bit, also, on what kind of guarantees we need to offer. If > the guarantee when reading IR from disk is "will not crash" then there's > nothing for it but to run full debug info verification. > > On the other hand, if we can assume that some specific metadata implies

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:45 PM David Greene via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> writes: > > > Here's a somewhat more complex example of changes made by myself a > > year and a half ago, starting with https://reviews.llvm.org/D48013 > > Aha! I found it! The "Stack" tab under "Revision

Hi, I realise this might be a Debian-specific question. I've got access to two hosts which have IPv6 connectivity, both of which are running Icecast 2.3.2. One is still running Debian Lenny and can be reached via IPv6 just fine, but the other is running Debian Squeeze and cannot. In addition, my local server which does not have IPv6 conectivity to the Internet but which can be reached

Hi there, Does anyone know a method to calculate the number of different patterns in a given data frame. The variables are of polytomous type and not binary (for the latter i found a package called "countpattern" which unfortunately only functions for binary variables). V1 V2 V3 0 3 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 So, in this case, i would like to get "2" as output. Thanks

Hi, I wanted to see if there was a way in IR to emit a local alias such that I would get: ``` .type _ZTVSt13bad_exception, at object # @_ZTVSt13bad_exception .globl _ZTVSt13bad_exception _ZTVSt13bad_exception: *.L_ZTVSt13bad_exception:* .long 0 # 0x0 .long (_ZTISt13bad_exception.rtti_proxy-.L_ZTVSt13bad_exception)-8 .long

Hi, Looking at the output of e.g. llc -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu test/CodeGen/X86/pre-coalesce.ll -debug-pass=Executions Why is it that 'Basic Alias Analysis (stateless AA impl)' is freed much earlier than 'Function Alias Analysis Results' even though the latter depends on the former (at least AFAICT by looking at lib/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.cpp)? Thanks! -Markus

Hi, referring to thread: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/users/177385#177385. I have the same thing going on: hypervisors with E5620 Xeon CPUs and hypervisors with E5410 CPUs. Live migrations go wrong when domU''s are not created on the latter and move from the E5410 servers to more recent ones. The rationale being that these CPU''s have less or other capabilities

> This is a public interface. But ASan runtime (and test-suite) strongly depends on > the instrumentation pass in Clang. How do you feel about adding a runtime init check of a version number defined by asan_interface.h? -Greg On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at

Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote: >> Take Sanjoy's example with the two atomic loads, but outline the body of the function into some private function. The same restrictions need apply. > > Do you mean like: > > static void bar() { > %t0 = load atomic %ptr > %t1 = load atomic %ptr > if (%t0 != %t1) print("X"); > } > void foo()

Op 14-1-2019 om 9:58 schreef Dominik Menke: > On 1/13/19 12:23 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> With ssl=yes, the TLS layer is enabled immediately on the connection. > > > Again, that's not what the documentation says: > > ??? ssl=yes [...]: SSL/TLS is offered to the client, but the client > ??? isn't required to use it. > > If the client is not _required_ to