Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "large_file_supported".
Did you mean:
large_file_support
2015 Jun 01
3
32 bits limit?
Sorry I don't understand you answer. For me 32 bits platforms are dead on
server side. So nobody would set up a new AD using Samba 4 above a 32 bits
system.
2015-06-01 14:34 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>:
>
> Am 01.06.2015 um 14:09 schrieb mathias dufresne:
>
>> Still playing with a big database (120k users, 150k computers) I tried to
>> split
2015 Jun 01
2
32 bits limit?
Hi,
You're quiet right, I'm using a 64 bits system and I was surprised by this
file size limitation on such a system. My bad regarding the title : )
Cheers,
mathias
2015-06-01 15:03 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>:
> On 01/06/15 13:47, mathias dufresne wrote:
>
>> Sorry I don't understand you answer. For me 32 bits platforms are dead on
2015 Jun 01
1
32 bits limit?
Once more, my bad : )
I'm using Ext4 file system, so no limitation from there (or missed
something)
2015-06-01 15:12 GMT+02:00 S?bastien Le Ray <sebastien-samba at orniz.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any possibility that you're using a filesystem which such
> limitations?
>
> Regards
>
>
> Le 01/06/2015 15:11, mathias dufresne a ?crit :
>
>> Hi,
2015 Jun 01
5
32 bits limit?
Hi all,
Still playing with a big database (120k users, 150k computers) I tried to
split my users into a lot of OUs. This increased the database size and I
was not able to finish to add users into the DB because database file has
reached 4GB size which seems to be the limit.
First: am I right to say file
/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=example,DC=com.ldb has a maximum size
of 4GB?
Secondly:
2015 Jun 01
0
32 bits limit?
On 01/06/15 13:47, mathias dufresne wrote:
> Sorry I don't understand you answer. For me 32 bits platforms are dead on
> server side. So nobody would set up a new AD using Samba 4 above a 32 bits
> system.
>
> 2015-06-01 14:34 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>:
>
>> Am 01.06.2015 um 14:09 schrieb mathias dufresne:
>>
>>> Still
2015 Jun 01
0
32 bits limit?
Hi,
Is there any possibility that you're using a filesystem which such
limitations?
Regards
Le 01/06/2015 15:11, mathias dufresne a ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> You're quiet right, I'm using a 64 bits system and I was surprised by this
> file size limitation on such a system. My bad regarding the title : )
>
> Cheers,
>
> mathias
>
> 2015-06-01 15:03 GMT+02:00
2017 Jan 17
1
Signing problems with macOS client and Linux Server
...SMB_3.02
SMB_SHARE_TYPE DISK
SIGNING_SUPPORTED TRUE
EXTENDED_SECURITY_SUPPORTED TRUE
UNIX_SUPPORT TRUE
LARGE_FILE_SUPPORTED TRUE
OS_X_SERVER TRUE
CLIENT_REQUIRES_SIGNING TRUE
FILE_IDS_SUPPORTED TRUE
DFS_SUPPORTED TRUE...
2017 Nov 08
2
Server-side copy support for Mac OS clients
...ABLED
SMB_VERSION SMB_3.02
SMB_SHARE_TYPE DISK
SIGNING_SUPPORTED TRUE
EXTENDED_SECURITY_SUPPORTED TRUE
LARGE_FILE_SUPPORTED TRUE
CLIENT_REQUIRES_SIGNING TRUE
FILE_IDS_SUPPORTED TRUE
DFS_SUPPORTED TRUE
FILE_LEASING_SUPPORTED TRUE...
2018 Jul 04
1
unexpected behavior of unzip with list=T and unzip=/usr/bin/unzip
Hello,
I encountered some unexpected behavior of unzip when using info-zip's unzip
instead of R's internal program. Specifically, unzip("file.zip", list=TRUE,
unzip=/usr/bin/unzip) produces incorrect output if the zip archive has
filenames with spaces, and results in an error if the zip archive includes
an archive comment or file comments.
Here is some code to reproduce along
2017 Apr 03
3
Problem with Samba 4.5.8 as a macOS server
...SMB_3.02
SMB_SHARE_TYPE DISK
SIGNING_SUPPORTED TRUE
EXTENDED_SECURITY_SUPPORTED TRUE
UNIX_SUPPORT TRUE
LARGE_FILE_SUPPORTED TRUE
OS_X_SERVER TRUE
CLIENT_REQUIRES_SIGNING TRUE
FILE_IDS_SUPPORTED TRUE
DFS_SUPPORTED TRUE...