search for: lanugages

Hi, I am having problem with filenames in a "Linux Samba server <-> Linux Samba Client" setup. The server has filenames with lanugage specific characters (???) in them. When mounted on the Linux workstation the characters are replaced by question marks. If I connect to the server with a Windows machine there is no problem with the characters. Also, if I connect with smbclient to

All, Can anyone see what''s happening here? ================== migration ======================= class CreateGreetings < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :greetings do |t| t.string :greet t.string :language t.integer :count t.timestamps end end def self.down drop_table :greetings end end ================== greeting.rb

Hi folks, Recently I''ve been using a MacBook Pro (Lion) as a workstation, I''m feeling good even if still missing some tool (coming from Ubuntu environment). I''d like to have a cross platform IDE with basic Puppet syntax highlight, so far the one that seems to better fit my needs is Komodo Edit v7, that is mentioned here:

In the creation of dynamic languages we often have to box values together. For instance, take the following expression: IntObj c = sqrt((a*a)+(b*b)); Here, most likely, a bytecode interpreter would execute this as "mul_ints", "add_ints", "sqrt", etc. Inside these primitive functions we would have to unwrap our IntObj types, add the values, allocate a new object and

...uage and the 'main audio-track' not completely free of language, but who cares, since the 'main-audio-track' is always played concurrently with one one of the speech-tracks. Of course speex would have to be able to efficiently encode language with a little mumble-jumble of other lanugages subtracted ;) Has anyone ever thought about this or is it complete and utter nonsense? Thanks for your time and of course for developing the best free audio-codecs! Regards, Hannes

...uage and the 'main audio-track' not completely free of language, but who cares, since the 'main-audio-track' is always played concurrently with one one of the speech-tracks. Of course speex would have to be able to efficiently encode language with a little mumble-jumble of other lanugages subtracted ;) Has anyone ever thought about this or is it complete and utter nonsense? Thanks for your time and of course for developing the best free audio-codecs! Regards, Hannes

Yo Zed, Just curious -- what do you think of the LiteSpeed server? Is it better than Lighty? Does it (gasp!) also serve Rails apps like Mongrel? I think I read that LiteSpeed doesn''t have proxying support. Thanks, Joe __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

...uage and the 'main audio-track' not completely free of language, but who cares, since the 'main-audio-track' is always played concurrently with one one of the speech-tracks. Of course speex would have to be able to efficiently encode language with a little mumble-jumble of other lanugages subtracted ;) Has anyone ever thought about this or is it complete and utter nonsense? Thanks for your time and of course for developing the best free audio-codecs! Regards, Hannes P.S: please keep me in CC

...uage and the 'main audio-track' not completely free of language, but who cares, since the 'main-audio-track' is always played concurrently with one one of the speech-tracks. Of course speex would have to be able to efficiently encode language with a little mumble-jumble of other lanugages subtracted ;) Has anyone ever thought about this or is it complete and utter nonsense? Thanks for your time and of course for developing the best free audio-codecs! Regards, Hannes P.S: please keep me in CC

...uage and the 'main audio-track' not completely free of language, but who cares, since the 'main-audio-track' is always played concurrently with one one of the speech-tracks. Of course speex would have to be able to efficiently encode language with a little mumble-jumble of other lanugages subtracted ;) Has anyone ever thought about this or is it complete and utter nonsense? Thanks for your time and of course for developing the best free audio-codecs! Regards, Hannes P.S: please keep me in CC

Hello all, A friend recently brought to my attention that vector assignment actually recreates the entire vector on which the assignment is performed. So for example, the code: x[10]<- NA # The original call (short version) Is really doing this: x<- replace(x, list=10, values=NA) # The original call (long version) # assigning a whole new vector to x Which is actually doing this: x<-