Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "lameenc".
Did you mean:
lame_enc
2004 Aug 06
3
de-essing into speex?
...zed and should therefore be of
equal quality, but in my ears the wma file is quite a lot better. it
may have less treble, but the spx file sounds very synthetic.
note: if i have used speexenc incorrectly please let me know.
the wav file was 2MB so i didn't want to include that, but simply use
lameenc etc to decode the mp3 file into wav if you want to do testing.
i hope to hear from you soon. i find this issue very interesting.
olav
> From: "Tony & Amanda Benik" <benikajal@mcihispeed.net>
> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:47:39 -0600
>
> Representative of Olav,
>...
2004 Aug 06
0
de-essing into speex?
...equal quality, but in my ears the wma file is quite a lot better. it
> may have less treble, but the spx file sounds very synthetic.
>
> note: if i have used speexenc incorrectly please let me know.
>
> the wav file was 2MB so i didn't want to include that, but simply use
> lameenc etc to decode the mp3 file into wav if you want to do testing.
>
> i hope to hear from you soon. i find this issue very interesting.
>
> olav
>
> > From: "Tony & Amanda Benik" <benikajal@mcihispeed.net>
> > Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:47:39 -0600
>...
2004 Aug 06
2
de-essing into speex?
are there plans to add "de-essing" as part of the speexenc procedure,
to make it possible to use lower quality compression without getting
those horrible computer-like "ess" sounds in the finished result?
like if you say "someone said the sun is shining", there is a lot of
ess sounds, and these will sound "computer-ish" at vbr qualities below
9.
i know