search for: l78

...;https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace.h#L21> [2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace_libcdep.cc#L78 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace_libcdep.cc#L78> [3] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrac...

...is > removed when the handle to libguestfs is closed. Right, the overlay is created by libguestfs itself and thrown away when the handle is closed: https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/master/lib/drives.c#L68 https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/master/lib/launch-direct.c#L78 However you can simply create your own overlay and use that. Run something like: qemu-img create -b orig_disk -f qcow2 my_overlay and change the guestfs_add_drive_opts call to use ?my_overlay? and don't use the readonly flag. > I'm talking about read-only mode so the real disks ar...

The coding style I use for compiz is very similar to what's used in the xserver. This was the best I could get out of GNU indent. indent -psl -saf -sai -saw -sob -i4 -bbo -bls -lp -di1 -pcs -bs -cs -bl -bli0 -cdb -sc -bad -bap -l78 The style in compiz is slightly different though. Function parameters are aligned and I usually align function parameter names and variable names too. I also cuddle up { in switch statements. Camel caps are used and I'm pretty strict with keeping all lines less than 80 columns wide. No extra w...

...xA&r=y8mub81SfUi-UCZRX0Vl1g&m=PyWoz5dhVQq4Qd3o66DlXu836tgSHFc2XCX0gHQyHoM&s=xPhup1hvHzIkL7yBEi03pLgh3ntvnZwqBzo-n-KzrMc&e=> > [2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace_libcdep.cc#L78 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_llvm_llvm-2Dproject_blob_fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548_compiler-2Drt_lib_sanitizer-5Fcommon_sanitizer-5Fstacktrace-5Flibcdep.cc-23L78&d=DwMFAg&c=I_0YwoKy7z5LMTVdyO6YCiE2uzI1jjZZuIPelcSjixA&r=y8mub81SfUi-UCZRX...

This was very helpful for me, thank you! On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 9:06 AM Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > The easiest way to tell if upsd is working is to run "upsc -l" on the same > system, which will list the NUT UPS names, and then run e.g. "upsc mge" > (replacing "mge" with the name returned by "upsc -l") > Here was the

...valds/linux/blob/11da3a7f84f1/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c#L513-L522 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/11da3a7f84f1/drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c#L306-L307 Below is the corresponding definition in split ring: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/blob/89dd55f5e606/split-ring.tex#L64-L78 If my understanding is correct, this is just for legacy interfaces, and we won't define layout in packed ring and don't need to support vring_new_virtqueue() in packed ring. Is it correct? Thanks! > > Will do that. > > > > > > +static inline void vring_init_pa...

...y decreases readability, is that I can't see the macro properly expanded when I do make <filename>.s For example, I get #APP # 164 "./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h" 1 STATIC_CPU_HAS bitnum=$8 cap_byte="boot_cpu_data+35(%rip)" feature=123 t_yes=.L75 t_no=.L78 always=117 #, MEM[(const char *)&boot_cpu_data + 35B],,,, # 0 "" 2 .loc 11 164 2 view .LVU480 #NO_APP but I'd like to see the actual asm as it is really helpful when hacking on inline asm stuff. And I haven't found a way to make gcc expand asm macros in .s output. N...

...these delays, note there seems to be an issue with ondelay/ups.delay.start: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/625 and rounding of the timers down to the next lower minute: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/f3a40e4595c1f18368f89b9af338bfe52dd06846/docs/man/usbhid-ups.txt#L53-L78 so basically I'd recommend testing shutdown extensively. > ups.load: 4 > ups.mfr: CPS > ups.model: CST135XLU > ups.productid: 0501 > ups.realpower.nominal: 810 > ups.serial: CR7EO2003120 > ups.status: OL > ups.test.result: No test initiated > ups.timer.shutdown: -60...

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > Hi Davide, > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> wrote: >> Although originally I wasn't, I'm increasingly convinced this is the >> right path forward (at least in the beginning), i.e. strip undef >> handling entirely. I tried

...an issue with > ondelay/ups.delay.start: > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/625 > > and rounding of the timers down to the next lower minute: > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/blob/f3a40e4595c1f18368f89b9af3 >38bfe52dd06846/docs/man/usbhid-ups.txt#L53-L78 > > so basically I'd recommend testing shutdown extensively. > > > ups.load: 4 > > ups.mfr: CPS > > ups.model: CST135XLU > > ups.productid: 0501 > > ups.realpower.nominal: 810 > > ups.serial: CR7EO2003120 > > ups.status: OL > > ups.test.r...

Revert the following commits: - 5bdcd510c2ac9efaf55c4cbd8d46421d8e2320cd ("x86/jump-labels: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around GCC inlining bugs") - d5a581d84ae6b8a4a740464b80d8d9cf1e7947b2 ("x86/cpufeature: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around GCC inlining bugs") - 0474d5d9d2f7f3b11262f7bf87d0e7314ead9200. ("x86/extable: Macrofy inline assembly

Revert the following commits: - 5bdcd510c2ac9efaf55c4cbd8d46421d8e2320cd ("x86/jump-labels: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around GCC inlining bugs") - d5a581d84ae6b8a4a740464b80d8d9cf1e7947b2 ("x86/cpufeature: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around GCC inlining bugs") - 0474d5d9d2f7f3b11262f7bf87d0e7314ead9200. ("x86/extable: Macrofy inline assembly

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:27:08AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> I'd rather have a patch just renaming split functions, then add all packed stuff

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:27:08AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> I'd rather have a patch just renaming split functions, then add all packed stuff