Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "l4es".
Did you mean:
4es
2006 Apr 20
0
Major internal changes, TI DSP build change
...?|8;??-Lx?!$??W???hv?O?**?xx-$??????>?&??&??e__????l'
???
???????~???O?M?hT ?'?&??0wQ'??f??
_[????M??m??h?c:?}?G???-
<?
??d?]:?.k,mTI??????eR????,?kJl??gqT????i??h?Y??Ndp(a?%?G??$???????1-e?G???v? V
???&??g??=?'?/$?O?y???PD??P&?*??@??????Q<??;?O3>Y:+8=L4es
Y??q`?
?Y?#&u!G?,?????X?=??$???
????F?Q|V?y
<????'Yxk??)????L??6??~?"<??"fD?+X,?R?? ???g??NCE}|e?4???VB?J?SK[??p>??-?4?????????b??Q????Bf>??e<???8????*?3#??|V??(]????k??P?."?q???-*VDW???%???S2??<T@y
???P?Q[^&%????B?????1M ?[?hF
|?+?@?K?q)?g~??#?<?SU
1...
2006 Apr 19
2
Major internal changes, TI DSP build change
> You found it. The SHL32 (not SHR32) line fixes the problem. It must be
> doing a 16-bit shift, then extending the result (which is reasonable). As
> it happens, that it the same macro which gave us trouble last May
> (25th/26th), when the C55 build was more subtlely broken.
Yes, that's what I finally remembered. I think I've fixed all
occurrences (by adding EXTEND32)