search for: l21

...ts to these objects. These objects will be also an element of another matrix. l <- matrix(nrow=nrow(load),ncol=ncol(load)) for(i in 1:nrow(load)) { for(j in 1:ncol(load)) { l[i,j]=paste("l",i,j,sep="")}} > l [,1] [,2] [1,] "l11" "l12" [2,] "l21" "l22" [3,] "l31" "l32" > l11 [1] 3 > l12 [1] 0 > l21 [1] 1 > l22 [1] 4 > l31 [1] 1 > l32 [1] 3 Let's say, I need to take the derivative of (l11*l21+l12*l22) with respect to l11,l12,l21,l22,l31,l32. > numericDeriv(quote(l11*l21+l12*l22...

...L10 2 0.181304809992027 9 L12 4 -3.05932766409779 10 L13 5 3.94067233590221 11 L16 7 1.68130480999203 12 L17 8 -1.31869519000797 13 L18 9 -2.05932766409779 14 L19 10 2.44067233590221 15 L21 13 -1.66682168482594 16 L22 14 0.0925458410842417 17 L23 15 -2.90745415891576 18 L28 19 1.09254584108424 19 L29 20 -1.90745415891576 20 L1 1 2.36694915254237 21 L2 11 -3.56101694915254 22 L3...

...fy.model for the sem package. I can't figure out how to represent the residual errors for the observed variables for a CFA model. (Once I get this working I need to add some further constraints.) Here is what I've tried: model.sa <- specify.model() F1 -> X1,l11, NA F1 -> X2,l21, NA F1 -> X3,l31, NA F1 -> X4,l41, NA F1 -> X5, NA, 0.20 F2 -> X1,l12, NA F2 -> X2,l22, NA F2 -> X3,l32, NA F2 -> X4,l42, NA F2 -> X6, NA, 0.25 F1 <-> F2,g12, 1 F1 <-> F1,g11, 1 F2 <-> F2,g22, 1 X1 <-> X1, NA, 1...

...Or is my mental model correct, and this a runtime (instead of compile time) check for other reasons? Compilation/build system convenience? Thanks, Julian [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace.h#L21 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace.h#L21> [2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace_libcdep...

...ect, and this a runtime (instead of compile time) check for other reasons? Compilation/build system convenience? > > Thanks, > Julian > > [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_stacktrace.h#L21 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_llvm_llvm-2Dproject_blob_fcbd7f64953b04f42dd59f606e45dc8e88a27548_compiler-2Drt_lib_sanitizer-5Fcommon_sanitizer-5Fstacktrace.h-23L21&d=DwMFAg&c=I_0YwoKy7z5LMTVdyO6YCiE2uzI1jjZZuIPelcSjixA&r=y8mub81SfUi-UCZRX0Vl1g&m...

Hi Kev, I'm glad to hear llvm-objdump is getting attention. I'm unclear on how much output specialization one could (or should) do for ELF vs. Mach-O. If you're game, let's compare an example: $ cat labeltest.s .text foo: nop bar: bum: nop jmp bar jmp bum jmp baz nop baz: nop Assembling for x86 and llvm-objdump'ing, i get $ llvm-mc

Hello, I''m writing my first puppet function rspec test and am having a problem which I don''t see how to solve. The function (and the test) involve access to files through the File Server. In order for the function (and the test) to work I need to pass "--fileserverconf=fileserver.conf" parameter to Puppet. So far I haven''t found a way to do that. If I

...file.path(SPARK_HOME, "R/lib/SparkR/R/SparkR"), envir = parent.frame(), filter = function(x) TRUE) } # parallelize() works now Please help me understand what goes wrong. Here is the whole repro: https://gist.github.com/zoltanctoth/971ae374dace93de12f0#file-sparkr-rstudio-parallelize-r-L21-L31 And the relevant files from the Spark installation: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/0xp2wgkbrl7ov64/AAAHRWdMecGMkVdo0GUs6fmYa?dl=0 Thanks, Best, Zoltan -- https://www.linkedin.com/in/zoltanctoth [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I had added a vignette to the coxme package and all worked well locally, but it failed at CRAN.???? The issue is that the vignette involves using coxme for pedigree data, it doesn't work without the kinship2 package, and I hadn't put in the necessary "if (require(...." logic. The question is, how do I make the entire vignette conditional? If the package isn't available,

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3738 Bug ID: 3738 Summary: References to autoreconf Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.9p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: Documentation Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 11:34:14PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 03:13:08PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I think we're on the same page with all that. As clarified in [1], that's not a > big concern, I was referring to the changes required to integrate the auxbus > stuff. Well, I see this thread having the realization that things are not setup

I spent the last couple of days rethinking how we go about building the appliance, and the difficulties we have porting that to other Linux distros. I've come up with a much better way that works better and faster on (so far) Fedora and Debian (probably on Ubuntu too, not tried it), and should be much simpler to port to other distros. The current way is to do: +------------------+

Hello, I didn't give enough information when I sent an query before, so I'm trying again with a more detailed explanation: In this data set, each patient has a different number of measured variables (they represent tumors, so some people had 2 tumors, some had 5, etc). The problem I have is that often in later cycles for a patient, tumors that were originally measured are now missing (or

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking