search for: kwizart

This patch is needed by initramfs tools to detect the required firmware files for the module. This patch tests for NOUVEAU_PLATFORM_DRIVER and either TEGRA_124_SOC or TEGRA_132_SOC for the firmwares related to the Tegra K1 generation. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c index ccefb64..862c225 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/...

2015-09-30 6:57 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Courbot <gnurou at gmail.com>: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> > wrote: > > This patch is needed by initramfs tools to detect > > the required firmware files for the module. > > > > This patch tests for either TEGRA_124_SOC or TEGRA_132_SOC > > for the firmwares related to the Tegra K1 generation. > > &gt...

...ired firmware files for the module. This patch tests for either TEGRA_124_SOC or TEGRA_132_SOC for the firmwares related to the Tegra K1 generation. v2: move the MODULE_FIRMWARE to the nvidia_platform.c file. This will avoid to test for NOUVEAU_PLATFORM_DRIVER Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c index 3eb6654..9013141 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_platform.c ++...

This allows to have the related MODULE_FIRMWARE tag only on relevant arch (arm64). This will saves about 400k on initramfs when not relevant Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c | 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gp10b.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c inde...

...com>: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 01:01:31PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> This allows to have the related MODULE_FIRMWARE tag only >> on relevant arch (arm64). >> This will saves about 400k on initramfs when not relevant >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c | 2 ++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gp10b.c | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/dri...

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> wrote: > This patch is needed by initramfs tools to detect > the required firmware files for the module. > > This patch tests for either TEGRA_124_SOC or TEGRA_132_SOC > for the firmwares related to the Tegra K1 generation. > > v2: move the MODULE_FIRMWARE to t...

On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 01:01:31PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > This allows to have the related MODULE_FIRMWARE tag only > on relevant arch (arm64). > This will saves about 400k on initramfs when not relevant > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart at gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c | 2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gp10b.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/gm20b.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv...

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 21:37, Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo at tecnico.ulisboa.pt> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:28:49AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 22:27, Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo at tecnico.ulisboa.pt> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 07:45:05AM +1000, David Airlie wrote: > > > > As a quick check can you try changing > >

On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 20:42, Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo at tecnico.ulisboa.pt> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 04:00:59PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 21:37, Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo at tecnico.ulisboa.pt> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:28:49AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 22:27, Diogo

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> An unfortunate interaction between the 32-bit ARM DMA/IOMMU mapping code and Tegra SMMU driver changes to support IOMMU groups introduced a boot- time regression on Tegra124. This was caught very late because none of the standard configurations that are tested on Tegra enable the ARM DMA/ IOMMU mapping code since it is not needed. The reason for