search for: kuba

> On 2 Sep 2016, at 12:11, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Kuba Brecka <kuba.brecka at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2 Sep 2016, at 11:18, Dmitry Vyukov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Kuba Brecka <kuba.brecka at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, &gt...

On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> > wrote: >> >> On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrot...

On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> > wrote: >> >> On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Eli Friedman wrote...

...into our own callback, which will perform the (extra) __tsan_release... Do you think that would work? E.g.: void call_once_callback_wrapper(...) { orig_func(orig_arg); __tsan_release(flag); } INTERCEPTOR(call_once, o, func, arg) { REAL(call_once)(flag, ..., call_once_callback_wrapper); } Kuba > On 2 Sep 2016, at 13:42, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com> wrote: > > INTERCEPTOR(call_once, o) { > __tsan_release_merge(o); > REAL(call_once)(o); > __tsan_acquire(o); > } > > ? > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Kuba Brecka <kuba.br...

...rg>", and I bet that the purpose of this weird address is to match the revision this reply belongs to. I never saw any email reply actually appear in the web interface, and that sounds like a server misconfiguration. Or is that something that Phabricator just doesn't support? Thanks, Kuba > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Duncan P. N. Exon Smith" <dexonsmith at apple.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] D24569: [libcxx] Allow sanitizing libcxx with ASan+UBSan simultaneously > Date: 14 September 2016 at 19:01:29 GMT+2 > To: reviews+D24569+public+a5763c0...

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug...

> On 2 Sep 2016, at 11:18, Dmitry Vyukov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Kuba Brecka <kuba.brecka at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to write a TSan interceptor for the C++11 call_once function. There are currently false positive reports, because the inner __call_once function is located in the (non-instrumented) libcxx library, and on...

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 2...

On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> > wrote: >> >> On Aug 21, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> This p...

...l effects and adds the .td and .h files to the sources list. At the very least, this should be expanded to include codeblocks, but I don’t know what magical macro is set when producing the .cbp file. Are there any cmake outputs where the addition of those extra sources would be an error? Cheers, Kuba Ober

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 8:46 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Jakub Staszak<kuba at gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 21, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 21...

Hello, This patch fixes PR4174. Two test-cases included: original one from bugzilla and a little bit complicated made be myself. It seems that LoopIndexSplit doesn't handle some cases, I'll try to send some patch this week. Regards -- Jakub Staszak -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pr4174.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size:

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 05:25:04PM -0700, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi Kuba, > > Try: > > __attribute__(optnone) > > See > https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#optnone-clang-optnone Actually, it should be enough to use: __attribute__((noinline)) void please_do_not_optimize_me_away(int arg1, void *arg2) { asm volatile("":...

...having interceptors that re-implement the logic. However, doing the same for call_once/__call_once doesn't work, because call_once is explicitly supposed to be exception-safe, but the sanitizer runtime libraries disallow exception handling. Any ideas how to handle call_once in TSan? Thanks! Kuba

...ng the arguments explicitly as inputs to the asm, but is that expected? Is there any more reasonable way (attribute) of telling that the compiler should really not expect anything from the body of the function, not assume that it's not doing anything, and not optimizing out arguments? Thanks, Kuba

If you can find out whether it's possible with the latest phab, I can update our instance. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016, 9:15 PM Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 06/07/2016 09:14 PM, Kuba Brecka via llvm-dev wrote: > > From an unrelated thread: > > > >> ... This will need to be fixed before we can commit the patch. Since > >> Phabricator automatically closed http://reviews.llvm.org/D12761, I've > >> created a new revision. The attached diff...

...gle, I plan to make a few transforms use the new incremental API, further improve PostDominatorTree by making it always have a virtual root, and to investigate batch updates. After that I would like to continue maintaining dominators, but I won’t be able spend as much time on it as I do now. Best, Kuba -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170717/e5d79bc6/attachment.html>

...rg/Users.html under Open Source Projects. The descriptions would be: 1. SeaHorn | An Algorithmic Logic-Based Reasoning Framework. 2. Crab-llvm | A static analyzer based on abstract interpretation for LLVM. I attach a patch that would add it to Users.html. Please let me know what you think. Best, Kuba -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171010/c46d21fe/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: users.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 844...

Hello, When I try: @tagged_items = Problem.find_tagged_with :all => ''kuba'' or @tagged_items = Problem.tags_count :limit => 100 I get this error: ArgumentError in Volume#index wrong number of arguments (2 for 3) RAILS_ROOT: script/../config/.. Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/acts_as_t...

Hi Kuba, Thanks for your feedback. I have made some improvements on the proposal according to your feedback and clarify something on the time availability. I left comments on the questions you asked in the doc. Please check it out. Thanks, Chijun 2018-03-22 10:37 GMT+08:00 Jakub (Kuba) Kuderski <kuba...