Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "kruskalmc".
Did you mean:
kruskal
2012 Dec 15
3
kruskalmc, significant differences while median values are the same
Dear list!
I work with multiple Kruskal-Wallis test (kruskalmc, package pgirmess), which evaluates differences in medians among groups (5 groups). A result of a test is significant differences among some groups, while median values are the same for 4 groups (using tapply). Why?
p.s.: number of samples in groups vary from 50 to 4900.
Thanks to all, OV
.
2012 Aug 03
1
Multiple Comparisons-Kruskal-Wallis-Test: kruskal{agricolae} and kruskalmc{pgirmess} don't yield the same results although they should do (?)
Hi there,
I am doing multiple comparisons for data that is not normally distributed.
For this purpose I tried both functions kruskal{agricolae} and
kruskalmc{pgirmess}. It confuses me that these functions do not yield the
same results although they are doing the same thing, don't they? Can anyone
tell my why this happens and which function I can trust?
kruskalmc() tells me that there are no differences between any of the groups
(i.e. the "diff...
2010 Oct 27
1
(no subject)
I am interested in using "multcompLetters" after running "kruskalmc" but
I'm a newbie and I'm not having luck figuring it out. I can run "kruskalmc" just fine,
but after studying the documentation for "multcompletters" for a long time,
I cannot figure out how to make it work. Any ideas? R input is below
>
>> #here is my d...
2010 Sep 01
0
kruskalmc
Hi, I would like to find out if the kruskalmc command in the pgirmess package controls for the family-wise type-I error rate.
Thank you
Dr. Iasonas Lamprianou
Assistant Professor (Educational Research and Evaluation)
Department of Education Sciences
European University-Cyprus
P.O. Box 22006
1516 Nicosia
Cyprus
Tel.: +357-22-713178
Fax: +3...
2013 Jul 05
1
kruskal.test followed by kruskalmc
Hi all,
After running kruskal.test I have got results (p<0,005) pointing to reject
the hypothesis that the samples were draw from the same population.
Howerver when I run the kruskalmc there are no significant differences in
any of the multiple comparisons. Is that possible? Some clarification?
Thanks, Humber
<https://sites.google.com/site/humberandrade>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2008 May 05
3
troubles with R CMD check and examples under Ubuntu gutsy
Dear listers,
I was used to package pgirmess under Windows with everything OK, but,
for the first time, I had a trial this afternoon on Ubuntu 7.10 gutsy (I
have a double boot computer and work more and more under unix) and R
2.7.0. Everything went OK except this:
sudo R CMD check pgirmess
.....
* checking examples ... ERROR
Running examples in 'pgirmess-Ex.R' failed.
The error most
2012 Jan 12
2
kruskal wallis post hoc?
Dear all,
I run a kruskal wallis test and found significant results. Then, I conducted all pairwise comparisons and found no significant results. Could anyone please give me a hint as to why this happens or redirect me towards a specific web page where I can find more info? (I used alpha=5% and made no bonferroni or other correction for the pairwise comparisons)
Thank you
Dr. Iasonas
2007 Oct 26
1
Post-hoc test for Kruskal-Wallis
Hi there,
I've got a small question :
is there any post-hoc test for Kruskal rank sum test integrated in R ?
I know that the Nemenyi test is one of the post-hoc that can be used,
but there's no (to by knowledge) R function for it.
What should I do ?
Thanks,
Etienne
2011 Jul 06
0
significant results with KW but not in post-hoc test
Dear all,
I did a Kruskall-Wallis test for a comparison of a variable of interest
between 10 sites and I get a significant result (p=0.0019). however, when I
perform a post-hoc test using kruskalmc from the pgirmess package, I get no
difference between any of the paired comparisons. I cannot find anything in
the internet, not in my stats books about how to explain this contradictory
result. I have also seen that somebody else asked this question in this
forum but she got no answers. Can an...
2007 May 21
2
more simplified output from glht object
Hi,
I use glht to make multcomp, using Tukey, from a glm model.
It is possible to get a more simplified output of result? Somethink like
ordering by letters.
Thanks
Ronaldo
--
Human kind cannot bear very much reality.
-- T. S. Eliot, "Four Quartets: Burnt Norton"
--
> Prof. Ronaldo Reis J?nior
| .''`. UNIMONTES/Depto. Biologia Geral/Lab. de Ecologia
| : :' :
2012 Jun 11
1
Kruskal Wallis Post hoc
Hi, I have searched and found a response to a question similar to mine but
when I tried the code, R says it's not an actual function so I thought I'd
ask here.
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4633035/Cookies.csv Cookies.csv
I have attached the data I am using. I am trying to look at two things: how
moisture content changes over time, and how it changes along the length of a
log
2008 Aug 29
2
non-parametric Anova and tukeyHSD
I have insect data from twelve sites and like most environmental data
it is non-normal mostly. I would like to preform an anova and a means
seperation like tukey's HSD in a nonparametric sense (on some sort of
central tendency measure - median?). I am searching around at this
time on the internet. Any suggestions, books, etc. would be greatly
appreciated.
--
Stephen Sefick
Research
2012 Jul 19
3
median comparison tests
Hi,
A client has a consumption measure on each of four products. The sample
size is 75. The consumption distributions are highly skewed for each
product. He would like a pairwise comparison test of the products, much
like Tukey's HSD but using medians rather than means. Is there such a
median comparison test in R?
Thanks,
Walt
________________________
Walter R. Paczkowski, Ph.D.