search for: knr

...failures for clang: ******************** Failing Tests (20): /Volumes/SandBox/2.6/llvm-2.6/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/ always_inline.c /Volumes/SandBox/2.6/llvm-2.6/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/ bitfield-promote.c /Volumes/SandBox/2.6/llvm-2.6/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/call- knr-indirect.c /Volumes/SandBox/2.6/llvm-2.6/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/inline.c /Volumes/SandBox/2.6/llvm-2.6/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/lineno- dbginfo.c /Volumes/SandBox/2.6/llvm-2.6/tools/clang/test/CodeGen/no- common.c /Volumes/SandBox/2.6/llvm-2.6/tools/clang/tes...

Just a reminder that today is the last day for pre-release2 testing. Thanks, Tanya

...-Qunused-arguments -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-empty-body -Wno-string-plus-int -Wno-tautological-compare -Wno-unused-value -Wno-parentheses-equality -Wno-unused-function -Wno-conversion -Wno-switch -Wno-switch-enum -Wno-knr-promoted-parameter -c /src/lib/libcompiler_rt/../../contrib/compiler-rt/lib/absvdi2.c -o absvdi2.o cc: unrecognized option '-Qunused-arguments' cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-empty-body" cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-string-plus-int&qu...

On 2020-07-27 19:20, hpa at zytor.com wrote: > > I'm not so sure they have dealt with it in the sense of having it work on all architectures. *Most* of the problems are related to the shifting the arguments by one, which can cause a bunch of problems, especially if it means the arguments spill to memory. However, I have absolutely no idea how to correctly implement syscall(3) on s390

...1-29-SimpleIndirectCall SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-02-04-DivRem SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-01-float_varg SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-04-DynAllocAndRestore SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-07-Compare64BitConstant SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-11-LoadConstants SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-03-02-VaCopy SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-04-25-weak SingleSource/UnitTests/2008-04-18-LoopBug SingleSource/UnitTests/2008-04-20-LoopBug2 SingleSource/UnitTests/2008-07-13-InlineSetjmp SingleSource/UnitTests/2009-04-16-BitfieldInitialization SingleSource/UnitTests/20...

...e)&EXPECT=10&FILTER=L&FORMAT_BLOCK_ON_RESPAGE=None&FORMAT_OBJECT=Alignment&FORMAT_TYPE=HTML&GAPCOSTS=11+1&I_THRESH=0.001&LAYOUT=TwoWindows&MATRIX_NAME=BLOSUM62&NCBI_GI=on&PAGE=Proteins&PROGRAM=blastp&QUERY=MVCDKCEKKLSKVIVPDKWKDGARNVTEGGGRKINENKLLSKKNRWSPYSTCTTKCMICKQQVHQDGKYCHTCAYSKGVCAMCGKQVLDTKMYKQSNV&SERVICE=plain&SET_DEFAULTS.x=9&SET_DEFAULTS.y=5&SHOW_OVERVIEW=on&WORD_SIZE=3&END_OF_HTTPGET=Yes\" TARGET=\"_blank\">At1g61780</A> against nr\nUnformatted <A HREF=\"../cgi/getseq.pl?GabiMips+...

I consider myself not having any real programming experience. I've went through 5 weeks long basic courses for each of these scripting languages. So no real programming experience to fall back on and I basically can't do anything useful with any of these languages anyways. Matlab PHP+MySQL bash But I want to learn just enough to be useful for the Wine project. And thus enable me to see

...(Y&Z8 F' 9: :$PDD4^2*O)#22T/& MR/XX(Y7DZ1*03 at L$1*QD\2%=XQ<9D3XH._[([F at E>226S)"D84R2R=U at R]8D MBE21;G)(8D at JR2;QI)#\CT120\K).>DD>4.4=!)MRD[NR#_9(@,EC'1+"6#_ M) M)>2/O'7 $BD;Q2NI)Z078$(.B#)(6<E.21V H AXCKQ$,0L;8?,HVR2@! M)!DL."$0,KFEK+14F(KNR"E_H>Q0"CXE[KI4R%-=92#2'#9)<^<07[JA=.>% M]T3&TM)F!$/[DFZ!2""%@5_Y =V 9IP.R0<WO @AP1T SJO<#LWP<JT8NW"^ MQMV_DU$V*Q1^I:LE F+ UD)X35(5LL*K5PR/(2Y2AG*%&1)!<3D7) JC2A9- MA6L82WPBZ4H+I0,1"=!(Y8$V0)=JRG0TD]<Q39;(*^@:YZ%[@H0OH&!.M:>...

...ce/UnitTests/block-byref-cxxobj-test | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2008-07-13-InlineSetjmp | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-01-23-UnionInit | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/block-byref-test | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/conditional-gnu-ext-cxx | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-09-SignedArgs...

...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-11-LoadConstants | 0.1270 3848 0.0452 * 0.0452 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.05 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args | 0.0037 616 0.0032 * 0.0028 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-03-02-VaCopy | 0.0036 800 0.0034 * 0.00...

...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-11-LoadConstants | 0.0640 3848 0.0400 * 0.0360 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.06 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args | 0.0040 616 0.0000 * 0.0080 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-03-02-VaCopy | 0.0000 796 0.0040 * 0.00...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-11-LoadConstants | 0.0962 3844 0.0315 * 0.0295 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.04 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args | 0.0090 608 0.0024 * 0.0024 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-03-02-VaCopy | 0.0083 792 0.0026 * 0.00...

...* 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-11-LoadConstants | 0.0476 3828 0.0257 * 0.0425 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.04 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args | 0.0015 640 0.0017 * * | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * * | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-03-02-VaCopy | 0.0016 1040 0.0025 * 0.00...

...01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-11-LoadConstants                          | > 0.0400 2704     0.0300      *                0.0400      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.04 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR-Args                               | > 0.0000 668      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-03-02-VaCopy                                 | > 0.0100 944      0.0100      *    ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...- n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-11- > LoadConstants | 0.0400 2704 0.0300 > * 0.0400 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.04 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-01-04-KNR- > Args | 0.0000 668 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2007-03-02- > VaCopy | 0.0100 944 0.0...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make