search for: kneecapped

Dear all I was wondering whether such a long post could be fortune-ed. What do you think? Regards Liviu On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Sharpie <chuck at sharpsteen.net> wrote: > Well, I can think of three ways it can go down: > > > 1. ?You want a shiny new pony. > > You ask about it on the mailing list and it seems that everyone else in the > world responds

goddess deforestation skyward upsetting retrogressive stenography aerodynamic ny chevy stead corporeal support moonlit alcove greek kneecap rustle hackneyed tomato

Hey all, you HAVE to read this blog post: http://blog.jrock.us/articles/RSpec%20vs.%20Test::More.pod#comments My favorite parts are: 1) ... some rspec code ... > For the sake of comparison lets translate this directly into perl: ... some perl code ... 2) >First, notice that the rspec-version isn''t actually ruby code. It''s not any real language. For the sake of

...eve much of the enthusiasm for (P)NaCL stems from the > hope that we'll finally be able to compile arbitrary languages for the > browser without being unduly hampered or constrained. Without TCO the > excitement here would be diminished. Functional programming languages > would be kneecapped by the bytecode. > > If my understanding above is correct, how can we get PNaCL to support > a sufficiently general calling convention to make TCO possible? > > The "Stability of the PNaCl bitcode ABI" [3] document notes that the > translator will be restoring the fastcc...

...get. Indeed, I believe much of the enthusiasm for (P)NaCL stems from the hope that we'll finally be able to compile arbitrary languages for the browser without being unduly hampered or constrained. Without TCO the excitement here would be diminished. Functional programming languages would be kneecapped by the bytecode. If my understanding above is correct, how can we get PNaCL to support a sufficiently general calling convention to make TCO possible? The "Stability of the PNaCl bitcode ABI" [3] document notes that the translator will be restoring the fastcc convention (though issue #2...

.... Indeed, I believe much of the enthusiasm for (P)NaCL stems from the hope that we'll finally be able to compile arbitrary languages for the browser without being unduly hampered or constrained. Without TCO the excitement here would be diminished. Functional programming languages would be kneecapped by the bytecode. If my understanding above is correct, how can we get PNaCL to support a sufficiently general calling convention to make TCO possible? The "Stability of the PNaCl bitcode ABI" [3] document notes that the translator will be restoring the fastcc convention (though is...

Hello, We (two mac users) have been attempting to install rgdal from "http://www.kyngchaos.com/software:frameworks", given that it is not available as a binary on the CRAN (binaries) of the "Package Installer". I have also tried to solve this problem by looking on the net for an old question, and though I have found it, the answers do not help very much because our porgraming

Hello, Following an earlier email ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-June/063010.html), we've published an initial version of the PNaCl bitcode reference manual online - http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/pnacl/bitcode-abi. The PNaCl bitcode is a restricted subset of LLVM IR. The reference manual is quite terse, so for the bigger picture I'll repost links to the design

Who decides what features are in R and how they are implemented? If there is someone here who has that authority I have this request: A report() function analogous to the plot() function that makes it easy to generate a report from a table of data. This should not be in some auxiliary package, but part of the core R just like plot(). As a long time SAS user I cannot believe R does not have this.