Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "kj7m6f8h4jlmei5poti".
Did you mean:
kj7m6f8h4jlmei5poty
2012 Feb 06
0
Meet the new maintainer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06.02.2012 18:52, Olav Sunde wrote:
> At 14:16 06.02.2012, you wrote:
>
>> Olav,
>>
>> A change like this could easily break the format. That would be
>> a bad choice.
>
> That makes sense. Explains why it is not there today.
>
>
>> On the other hand, an informational 'application' block
2012 Feb 06
3
Meet the new maintainer
At 14:16 06.02.2012, you wrote:
>Olav,
>
>A change like this could easily break the format. That would be a bad choice.
That makes sense. Explains why it is not there today.
>On the other hand, an informational 'application' block could be added in a way that does not break the format, and this would even be backwards compatible since 'application' blocks have