Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "kj7m6f8h4jlmei5poty".
2012 Feb 06
0
Meet the new maintainer
...E-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPL/EaAAoJEOs4Jb6SI2CwBXgH/jaff2VYtoRfZEmU5iy5MXwT
lr/jDUkxgW11MLdXzZXk3Xwlg40iqPaE0Egn7Ie5SM2DgoVU52k7NrR6uC+U8Ii3
+cUp7EAH3bIRVrREeAPfhVUJiyCJSVmemBLPrRWRktaFeMBhw5K6wynG6lvQBTDm
Kj7m6F8H4JLMEI5PoTY/ur3L4/G4yZ++4jwTMNvicO8EljlLCdKVE6X+Ojb3kF7G
TkZyOsGZaSglETqkT8nZuVChq4DYSUcOX+MEeo3Ovdu1U6WefULw8VnFsqhL2yMU
OhRbo7+3+GzxHeMvF2Vo08smcA1BTThCiHCuZaYNmJ0n1Z86/xwk2xh8o4/CTM8=
=MRol
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2012 Feb 06
3
Meet the new maintainer
At 14:16 06.02.2012, you wrote:
>Olav,
>
>A change like this could easily break the format. That would be a bad choice.
That makes sense. Explains why it is not there today.
>On the other hand, an informational 'application' block could be added in a way that does not break the format, and this would even be backwards compatible since 'application' blocks have