search for: kj7m6f8h4jlmei5poty

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "kj7m6f8h4jlmei5poty".

2012 Feb 06
0
Meet the new maintainer
...E----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPL/EaAAoJEOs4Jb6SI2CwBXgH/jaff2VYtoRfZEmU5iy5MXwT lr/jDUkxgW11MLdXzZXk3Xwlg40iqPaE0Egn7Ie5SM2DgoVU52k7NrR6uC+U8Ii3 +cUp7EAH3bIRVrREeAPfhVUJiyCJSVmemBLPrRWRktaFeMBhw5K6wynG6lvQBTDm Kj7m6F8H4JLMEI5PoTY/ur3L4/G4yZ++4jwTMNvicO8EljlLCdKVE6X+Ojb3kF7G TkZyOsGZaSglETqkT8nZuVChq4DYSUcOX+MEeo3Ovdu1U6WefULw8VnFsqhL2yMU OhRbo7+3+GzxHeMvF2Vo08smcA1BTThCiHCuZaYNmJ0n1Z86/xwk2xh8o4/CTM8= =MRol -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2012 Feb 06
3
Meet the new maintainer
At 14:16 06.02.2012, you wrote: >Olav, > >A change like this could easily break the format. That would be a bad choice. That makes sense. Explains why it is not there today. >On the other hand, an informational 'application' block could be added in a way that does not break the format, and this would even be backwards compatible since 'application' blocks have