Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "kiwwwi".
Did you mean:
kiwi
2015 Nov 12
1
UPnP support in tinc
fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> writes:
> Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes:
>> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved
>> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client
>> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That&...
2015 Nov 12
1
UPnP support in tinc
On 12 November 2015 at 01:15, fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> wrote:
> Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes:
>> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved
>> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client
>> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That...
2015 Nov 11
3
UPnP support in tinc
On 11 November 2015 at 21:57, David Nicol <davidnicol at gmail.com> wrote:
> it is entirely possible to write code that uses threads on Win32 and forks
> on POSIX by abstracting the communication bits generically. Signalling could
> work over pipes on both.
>
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365152(v=vs.85).aspx
Hum... yes of course, but I
2015 Nov 12
0
UPnP support in tinc
Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes:
> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved
> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client
> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very
> user-friendly, though. Especially on Windows.)
something like this :P
2013 Dec 13
1
*-{up,down} env vars
hi! yesterday i was adding "hooks" to librevpn's tools[0] and while
debugging[1] why tinc would say the scripts exited with non zero status,
i noticed the PWD wasn't set to what i expected (PWD=/ instead of
PWD=/etc/tinc/$NETNAME). the hooks/scripts dir is in scripts/ so
running scripts/$event-* would fail because it'd look for them in
/scripts/$event-*...
at first i
2015 Feb 02
2
Tincd fails to resolve domain names before it is started name resolution becomes available.
William Kennington <william at wkennington.com> writes:
> Agreed.
> On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote:
>
>> Considering how cheap that operation seems to be, would it make sense
>> to call res_init() every time tinc retries a metaconnection? It's not
>> doing that very often anyway... and it would solve