Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "kiss_fft_malloc".
Did you mean:
kiss_fft_alloc
2006 May 10
0
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
...ecoder, including the ability to override the malloc
>> function.
>
>What do you mean here?
misc.c provides the ability to override some functions, including the
allocation and printing. fftwrap.c uses speex_alloc, then calls
kiss_fftr_alloc, which calls kiss_fft_alloc, which calls KISS_FFT_MALLOC,
which is defined as malloc in kiss_fft.h. It would make it more consistent
to define KISS_FFT_MALLOC as speex_alloc. That is the only change that I
would suggest here.
I was not able to use the default speex_alloc for this build, because the TI
calloc routine would not work with a heap larg...
2006 May 10
2
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
> Build 11387 produces the same result as my modified build 11343. Because of
> compiler limitations in the TI tools, I did have to make modifications to
> pseudofloat.h (separating return of float values) and nb_celp.c (adding
> braces around a variable declaration in the middle of code). I have
> attached a patch. You might prefer to do the nb_celp.c change in a
>
2006 May 10
2
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
> misc.c provides the ability to override some functions, including the
> allocation and printing. fftwrap.c uses speex_alloc, then calls
> kiss_fftr_alloc, which calls kiss_fft_alloc, which calls KISS_FFT_MALLOC,
> which is defined as malloc in kiss_fft.h. It would make it more consistent
> to define KISS_FFT_MALLOC as speex_alloc. That is the only change that I
> would suggest here.
OK, I understand what you mean now. kiss_fft is a separate packaged I
merged into Speex, but which I haven...