Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "kiss_fft_alloc".
2011 Feb 20
1
Modifications of kiss_fft/compatibility with original kiss_fft code?
...essor into the celt
code, I would like to check whether the changes, that were made to the
original kiss_fft code, change the actual behaviour of the kiss_fft
function or whether they were only made for speed improvement or
cosmetic reasons. In other words, could I still replace the functions
"kiss_fft_alloc" and "kiss_fft" with the original code (apart from the
fact that there are now functions for the inverse transformation in celt)?
Many thanks and best regards,
Frank
2006 May 10
0
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
...t; as
>> the encoder/decoder, including the ability to override the malloc
>> function.
>
>What do you mean here?
misc.c provides the ability to override some functions, including the
allocation and printing. fftwrap.c uses speex_alloc, then calls
kiss_fftr_alloc, which calls kiss_fft_alloc, which calls KISS_FFT_MALLOC,
which is defined as malloc in kiss_fft.h. It would make it more consistent
to define KISS_FFT_MALLOC as speex_alloc. That is the only change that I
would suggest here.
I was not able to use the default speex_alloc for this build, because the TI
calloc routine wo...
2006 May 10
2
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
> Build 11387 produces the same result as my modified build 11343. Because of
> compiler limitations in the TI tools, I did have to make modifications to
> pseudofloat.h (separating return of float values) and nb_celp.c (adding
> braces around a variable declaration in the middle of code). I have
> attached a patch. You might prefer to do the nb_celp.c change in a
>
2006 May 10
2
Speex echo canceller on TI C55 DSP
> misc.c provides the ability to override some functions, including the
> allocation and printing. fftwrap.c uses speex_alloc, then calls
> kiss_fftr_alloc, which calls kiss_fft_alloc, which calls KISS_FFT_MALLOC,
> which is defined as malloc in kiss_fft.h. It would make it more consistent
> to define KISS_FFT_MALLOC as speex_alloc. That is the only change that I
> would suggest here.
OK, I understand what you mean now. kiss_fft is a separate packaged I
merged int...
2008 Mar 29
0
GCC/ELF Visibility patch
...ank
-T filterbank_compute_bank32
-T filterbank_compute_psd
-T filterbank_compute_psd16
-T filterbank_destroy
-T filterbank_new
-T filterbank_psy_smooth
T _fini
T _init
T jitter_buffer_ctl
@@ -21,14 +14,6 @@
T jitter_buffer_reset
T jitter_buffer_tick
T jitter_buffer_update_delay
-T kiss_fft
-T kiss_fft_alloc
-T kiss_fftr
-T kiss_fftr2
-T kiss_fftr_alloc
-T kiss_fftri
-T kiss_fftri2
-T kiss_fft_stride
T speex_buffer_destroy
T speex_buffer_get_available
T speex_buffer_init
@@ -40,7 +25,6 @@
T speex_echo_cancellation
T speex_echo_capture
T speex_echo_ctl
-T speex_echo_get_residual
T speex_echo_play...
2008 Mar 29
2
GCC/ELF Visibility patch (fwd)
...ank
-T filterbank_compute_bank32
-T filterbank_compute_psd
-T filterbank_compute_psd16
-T filterbank_destroy
-T filterbank_new
-T filterbank_psy_smooth
T _fini
T _init
T jitter_buffer_ctl
@@ -21,14 +14,6 @@
T jitter_buffer_reset
T jitter_buffer_tick
T jitter_buffer_update_delay
-T kiss_fft
-T kiss_fft_alloc
-T kiss_fftr
-T kiss_fftr2
-T kiss_fftr_alloc
-T kiss_fftri
-T kiss_fftri2
-T kiss_fft_stride
T speex_buffer_destroy
T speex_buffer_get_available
T speex_buffer_init
@@ -40,7 +25,6 @@
T speex_echo_cancellation
T speex_echo_capture
T speex_echo_ctl
-T speex_echo_get_residual
T speex_echo_play...