search for: killians

hi all I've been reading this thread with interest. As a rather novice programmer. I'm not being humble here, I really am not very good, I can do stuff, but it takes a LONG time. My spaghetti code even has meatballs in it ! Not being a great programmer I'm not really able to code something up, but it occurred to me something could be scripted, are the other posters suggesting

Hello, I don''t know if TCO is supported for XEN_NETDEV_FRONTED in kernel 3.1.6, however I found an issue. I had to track down an issue today: Packet from a local machine didn''t get routed to the internet. After long searching I found the issue: The TCP-Segmentation-offloading assembles fragments with Do Not Fragment set. This introduces issues when the packet is to be rerouted

Am 02.03.2015 um 18:56 schrieb Robert Schetterer: > perhaps and i mean really "perhaps" go this way > > https://sys4.de/de/blog/2014/03/27/fighting-smtp-auth-brute-force-attacks/ > > https://sys4.de/de/blog/2012/12/28/botnets-mit-rsyslog-und-iptables-recent-modul-abwehren/ > > 45K+ IPs will work in a recent table > i have them too but for smtp only like > >

Thanks for the note. I had never seen anything in the postfix and apache documentation that the CRLs could be intermingled with the CRTs in the CRT file. The documentation for those programs suggests putting the CRLs in a separate file (e.g. apache SSLCARevocationFile) or doesn't talk about putting CRLs in with the certs (e.g. postfix smtpd_tls_cert_file). If it works to put them all in one

On 03/04/2015 05:03 AM, Earl Killian wrote: > I would like to reiterate Reindl Harald's point above, since subsequent > discussion has gotten away from it. If Dovecot had DNS RBL support > similar to Postfix, I think quite a few people would use it, and thereby > defeat the scanners far more effectively than any other method. It is > good that other people are suggesting things

Hi all, ok, can someone tell me which header fields that the "Sender" function in sieve looks at ??? I've created a sieve rule to move a mail to a directory that looks like this : # rule:[File Message] if anyof (address :contains "Sender" "Dude") { fileinto "TestFolder"; } And the emails headers look like this : Received: (qmail 5811 invoked

On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: > On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> that is all nice >> >> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >> >> * centralized >> * no log parsing at all >> * honeypot data are "delivered" to any host >> * it's cheap >> * it's easy to maintain >> * it

Am 16.02.2015 um 15:53 schrieb dovecot at lists.killian.com: > Why not /etc/dovecot/private? That's where I put my dovecot certs. Dovecot's needs are a bit different from other software, and so it is unclear whether the files won't be unique to it. For example, I haven't seen the following before I read it on the Dovecot wiki: > > "The CA file should contain the

Am 04.03.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: >> On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> that is all nice >>> >>> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >>> >>> * centralized >>> * no log parsing at all >>> * honeypot data are "delivered"

Ok I have to get a vote of all the people that are going to come to Cluecon so we order the beer keg's for the developers board room. Anyone have any preference? (if you haven't registered for ClueCon now is the time to register!) Choices... choices... choices... I want Red Bull on tap! /b --- Anakin: ?You?re either with me, or you?re my enemy.? Obi-Wan: ?Only a Sith could be an

Dear All, I am trying to create a empty structure that I want to fill gradually through the code. I want to use something like rbind to create the basic structure first. I am looking for a possibility to do an rbind where the columns names dont match fully (but the missing columns can be defaulted to either zero or n/a) (my actual data has a lot of columns). Please see the data frames below I

Why not /etc/dovecot/private? That's where I put my dovecot certs. Dovecot's needs are a bit different from other software, and so it is unclear whether the files won't be unique to it. For example, I haven't seen the following before I read it on the Dovecot wiki: "The CA file should contain the certificate(s) followed by the matching CRL(s). Note that the CRLs are required

I have the following problem: I have some string with numbers like k. I want to have a table like the function table() gives. However I am not able to call the first row, the 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 or 9. I tried to do that by a data.frame, but that doesn't seem to work either. The levels keep bothering me. This is an example of the code: k<-c(1,1,1,1,1,3,5,6,2,1,3,9,2,3,1,1,1) > table(k) k 1 2

**** CALL FOR PAPERS **** The 23nd International ACM Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing (HPDC-2014) Vancouver, Canada - June 23-27, 2014 http://www.hpdc.org/2014 The ACM International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing (HPDC) is the

**** CALL FOR PAPERS **** The 23nd International ACM Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing (HPDC-2014) Vancouver, Canada - June 23-27, 2014 http://www.hpdc.org/2014 The ACM International Symposium on High-Performance Parallel and Distributed Computing (HPDC) is the

On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: > > that is all nice > > but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: > > * centralized > * no log parsing at all > * honeypot data are "delivered" to any host > * it's cheap > * it's easy to maintain > * it don't need any root privileges anywhere > > we have a small honeypot network with a

On 2015/2/16 16:28, Jochen Bern wrote: > On 02/16/2015 04:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> "The CA file should contain the certificate(s) followed by the >>> matching CRL(s). Note that the CRLs are required to exist. For a >>> multi-level CA place the certificates in this order: >>> >>> Issuing CA cert >>> Issuing CA CRL