search for: killian

...bash script... (I feel like my hair is going grey ;) ... Maybe even a good bash project for me as a beginner. Just a question to see if I am understanding the general preposition of this thread. thanks for you time, and to helping me to learn this stuff. David On 4 Mar 2015 05:04, "Earl Killian" <dovecot at lists.killian.com> wrote: > On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> >> that is all nice >> >> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >> >> * centralized >> * no log parsing at all >> * honeypot data ar...

...network, fragmented, but it''s not allowed, so instead it drops the packet. I''m not sure if it''s "working as designed" or if this is an unfortunate side effect. Feedback welcome, (even "You are an idiot, of course it''s going to fail !" :) ) Killian De Volder

Am 02.03.2015 um 18:56 schrieb Robert Schetterer: > perhaps and i mean really "perhaps" go this way > > https://sys4.de/de/blog/2014/03/27/fighting-smtp-auth-brute-force-attacks/ > > https://sys4.de/de/blog/2012/12/28/botnets-mit-rsyslog-und-iptables-recent-modul-abwehren/ > > 45K+ IPs will work in a recent table > i have them too but for smtp only like > >

...che SSLCARevocationFile) or doesn't talk about putting CRLs in with the certs (e.g. postfix smtpd_tls_cert_file). If it works to put them all in one file for those programs, that's good to know. On 2015/2/16 07:23, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 16.02.2015 um 15:53 schrieb dovecot@lists.killian.com: >> Why not /etc/dovecot/private? That's where I put my dovecot certs. Dovecot's needs are a bit different from other software, and so it is unclear whether the files won't be unique to it. For example, I haven't seen the following before I read it on the Dovecot wiki: &gt...

On 03/04/2015 05:03 AM, Earl Killian wrote: > I would like to reiterate Reindl Harald's point above, since subsequent > discussion has gotten away from it. If Dovecot had DNS RBL support > similar to Postfix, I think quite a few people would use it, and thereby > defeat the scanners far more effectively than any other...

Hi all, ok, can someone tell me which header fields that the "Sender" function in sieve looks at ??? I've created a sieve rule to move a mail to a directory that looks like this : # rule:[File Message] if anyof (address :contains "Sender" "Dude") { fileinto "TestFolder"; } And the emails headers look like this : Received: (qmail 5811 invoked

On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: > On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> that is all nice >> >> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >> >> * centralized >> * no log parsing at all >> * honeypot data are "delivered" to any host >> * it...

Am 16.02.2015 um 15:53 schrieb dovecot at lists.killian.com: > Why not /etc/dovecot/private? That's where I put my dovecot certs. Dovecot's needs are a bit different from other software, and so it is unclear whether the files won't be unique to it. For example, I haven't seen the following before I read it on the Dovecot wiki: > &g...

Am 04.03.2015 um 20:12 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > On 03/03/2015 11:03 PM, Earl Killian wrote: >> On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> that is all nice >>> >>> but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: >>> >>> * centralized >>> * no log parsing at all >>> * honeypot data are "deliv...

Ok I have to get a vote of all the people that are going to come to Cluecon so we order the beer keg's for the developers board room. Anyone have any preference? (if you haven't registered for ClueCon now is the time to register!) Choices... choices... choices... I want Red Bull on tap! /b --- Anakin: ?You?re either with me, or you?re my enemy.? Obi-Wan: ?Only a Sith could be an

Dear All, I am trying to create a empty structure that I want to fill gradually through the code. I want to use something like rbind to create the basic structure first. I am looking for a possibility to do an rbind where the columns names dont match fully (but the missing columns can be defaulted to either zero or n/a) (my actual data has a lot of columns). Please see the data frames below I

Why not /etc/dovecot/private? That's where I put my dovecot certs. Dovecot's needs are a bit different from other software, and so it is unclear whether the files won't be unique to it. For example, I haven't seen the following before I read it on the Dovecot wiki: "The CA file should contain the certificate(s) followed by the matching CRL(s). Note that the CRLs are required

I have the following problem: I have some string with numbers like k. I want to have a table like the function table() gives. However I am not able to call the first row, the 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 or 9. I tried to do that by a data.frame, but that doesn't seem to work either. The levels keep bothering me. This is an example of the code: k<-c(1,1,1,1,1,3,5,6,2,1,3,9,2,3,1,1,1) > table(k) k 1 2

...lexandru Iosup, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands Shantenu Jha, Rutgers University, USA Hai Jin Huazhong, University of Science and Technology, China Larry Kaplan, Cray, Inc., USA Kate Keahey, Argonne National Laboratory, USA Thilo Kielmann, Vrije Universiteit, the Netherlands Charles Killian, Google, USA Zhiling Lan, Illinois Institute of Technology, USA John (Jack) Lange, University of Pittsburgh, USA Minglu Li, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China Barney Maccabe, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA Naoya Maruyama, RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science, Japan Satoshi Matsuo...

...lexandru Iosup, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands Shantenu Jha, Rutgers University, USA Hai Jin Huazhong, University of Science and Technology, China Larry Kaplan, Cray, Inc., USA Kate Keahey, Argonne National Laboratory, USA Thilo Kielmann, Vrije Universiteit, the Netherlands Charles Killian, Google, USA Zhiling Lan, Illinois Institute of Technology, USA John (Jack) Lange, University of Pittsburgh, USA Minglu Li, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China Barney Maccabe, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA Naoya Maruyama, RIKEN Advanced Institute for Computational Science, Japan Satoshi Matsuo...

On 2015/3/2 10:03, Reindl Harald wrote: > > that is all nice > > but the main benefit of RBL's is always ignored: > > * centralized > * no log parsing at all > * honeypot data are "delivered" to any host > * it's cheap > * it's easy to maintain > * it don't need any root privileges anywhere > > we have a small honeypot network with a

On 2015/2/16 16:28, Jochen Bern wrote: > On 02/16/2015 04:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> "The CA file should contain the certificate(s) followed by the >>> matching CRL(s). Note that the CRLs are required to exist. For a >>> multi-level CA place the certificates in this order: >>> >>> Issuing CA cert >>> Issuing CA CRL