search for: keefox

On 09/21/2016 06:50 AM, H wrote: > Thank you, downloaded and installed keepassx2 from EPEL since keepassx seemed to suffer from a bug per the home page. Which URL describes the bug? > The database opened fine but unfortunately the KeeFox extension for Firefox does not seem to be compatible... KeeFox, AFAIK, is an extension that interfaces with Keepass, the .Net application. KeepassX is a different product. I don't see a browser plugin that interfaces with that one.

On 09/21/2016 09:16 AM, H wrote: > I wish there was one, it makes all the difference by allowing automated login to websites. Maybe you should take another look at keepass, then? Mono is available in EPEL. keepass runs reasonably well in it. keefox should work as expected. The technical barriers here are .. basically non-existent.

Is anyone running keepass on C6? I have a rather large password database under Windows that I want also to use on my Centos systems. It seems that keepass is not available, it relies on mono and there may be bugs. Googling also seems to suggest that I should download the source code and compile to install. The nux repository seems to have a version for C7, but not for C6. Many suppositions and

..., Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/21/2016 06:50 AM, H wrote: >> Thank you, downloaded and installed keepassx2 from EPEL since keepassx >> seemed to suffer from a bug per the home page. > > Which URL describes the bug? > >> The database opened fine but unfortunately the KeeFox extension for >> Firefox does not seem to be compatible... > > > KeeFox, AFAIK, is an extension that interfaces with Keepass, the .Net > application. KeepassX is a different product. I don't see a browser > plugin that interfaces with that one. And I for one wouldn't...

...essmer at gmail.com> wrote: >On 09/21/2016 06:50 AM, H wrote: >> Thank you, downloaded and installed keepassx2 from EPEL since >keepassx seemed to suffer from a bug per the home page. > >Which URL describes the bug? > >> The database opened fine but unfortunately the KeeFox extension for >Firefox does not seem to be compatible... > > >KeeFox, AFAIK, is an extension that interfaces with Keepass, the .Net >application. KeepassX is a different product. I don't see a browser >plugin that interfaces with that one. > >________________________...

On Wed, September 21, 2016 4:30 pm, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2016-09-21, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 09/21/2016 11:30 AM, H wrote: >>> You are right, I'll look at it again. Let me ask, what other password >>> managers are people using, if any? >> >> >> I use keepass, but I know people who like: >> >>

..._______________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thank you, downloaded and installed keepassx2 from EPEL since keepassx seemed to suffer from a bug per the home page. The database opened fine but unfortunately the KeeFox extension for Firefox does not seem to be compatible...

...l.com> wrote: >On 09/21/2016 09:16 AM, H wrote: >> I wish there was one, it makes all the difference by allowing >automated login to websites. > > >Maybe you should take another look at keepass, then? Mono is available > >in EPEL. keepass runs reasonably well in it. keefox should work as >expected. The technical barriers here are .. basically non-existent. > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos You are right, I'll look at it again. Let me...

...ins.html > Thanks > to that I can open the same encrypted password store on pretty much all > devices and systems I use. However, no, I don't consider it reasonable for > myself to use it from inside web browser Do you use KeepassX's auto-type? That's (approximately) what KeeFox does, except that the plugin interface is more secure. Note that KeepassX doesn't offer that feature on OS X and Windows. Since web passwords are probably the most common use of a password manager, auto-fill of web login forms should be considered an essential function for such a program...

...5 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/21/2016 09:16 AM, H wrote: >> I wish there was one, it makes all the difference by allowing automated login to websites. > > > Maybe you should take another look at keepass, then? Mono is available in EPEL. keepass runs reasonably well in it. keefox should work as expected. The technical barriers here are .. basically non-existent. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos It seems this is only for C7?