On 09/21/2016 06:50 AM, H wrote:> Thank you, downloaded and installed keepassx2 from EPEL since keepassx seemed to suffer from a bug per the home page.Which URL describes the bug?> The database opened fine but unfortunately the KeeFox extension for Firefox does not seem to be compatible...KeeFox, AFAIK, is an extension that interfaces with Keepass, the .Net application. KeepassX is a different product. I don't see a browser plugin that interfaces with that one.
On Wed, September 21, 2016 10:57 am, Gordon Messmer wrote:> On 09/21/2016 06:50 AM, H wrote: >> Thank you, downloaded and installed keepassx2 from EPEL since keepassx >> seemed to suffer from a bug per the home page. > > Which URL describes the bug? > >> The database opened fine but unfortunately the KeeFox extension for >> Firefox does not seem to be compatible... > > > KeeFox, AFAIK, is an extension that interfaces with Keepass, the .Net > application. KeepassX is a different product. I don't see a browser > plugin that interfaces with that one.And I for one wouldn't trust any browser (huge sophisticated chunk of code, capable executing someone's else code - like java scripts etc) to go inside my encrypted password database. If you want security, paranoia is your friend. If you don't want security, why use KeepassX in the first place? Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
On September 21, 2016 11:57:14 AM EDT, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote:>On 09/21/2016 06:50 AM, H wrote: >> Thank you, downloaded and installed keepassx2 from EPEL since >keepassx seemed to suffer from a bug per the home page. > >Which URL describes the bug? > >> The database opened fine but unfortunately the KeeFox extension for >Firefox does not seem to be compatible... > > >KeeFox, AFAIK, is an extension that interfaces with Keepass, the .Net >application. KeepassX is a different product. I don't see a browser >plugin that interfaces with that one. > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centosI wish there was one, it makes all the difference by allowing automated login to websites. I have not gotten Auto-Type to work...
On September 21, 2016 12:10:18 PM EDT, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote:> >On Wed, September 21, 2016 10:57 am, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 09/21/2016 06:50 AM, H wrote: >>> Thank you, downloaded and installed keepassx2 from EPEL since >keepassx >>> seemed to suffer from a bug per the home page. >> >> Which URL describes the bug? >> >>> The database opened fine but unfortunately the KeeFox extension >for >>> Firefox does not seem to be compatible... >> >> >> KeeFox, AFAIK, is an extension that interfaces with Keepass, the .Net >> application. KeepassX is a different product. I don't see a browser >> plugin that interfaces with that one. > >And I for one wouldn't trust any browser (huge sophisticated chunk of >code, capable executing someone's else code - like java scripts etc) to >go >inside my encrypted password database. If you want security, paranoia >is >your friend. If you don't want security, why use KeepassX in the first >place? > >Valeri > > >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >Valeri Galtsev >Sr System Administrator >Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics >Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics >University of Chicago >Phone: 773-702-4247 >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centosWell, I am not sure how KeeFox and Keepass work together. At some time the browser needs the userid and password to login.
On 09/21/2016 09:16 AM, H wrote:> I wish there was one, it makes all the difference by allowing automated login to websites.Maybe you should take another look at keepass, then? Mono is available in EPEL. keepass runs reasonably well in it. keefox should work as expected. The technical barriers here are .. basically non-existent.