search for: kch

...8:54 (test-pc) via eth0 BUT, then i use script from article in console like root at ad1:~# /etc/dhcp/bin/dhcp-dyndns.sh add 10.10.1.254 01:02:03:04:06:07 twofivefoup i get could not find enclosing zone in STDOUT and May 17 14:32:09 ad1 named[611]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone kch.remel.lan May 17 14:32:09 ad1 named[611]: samba_dlz: allowing update of signer=dhcpuser\@KCH.REMEL.LAN name=twofivefoup.kch.remel.lan tcpaddr=127.0.0.1 type=A key=2973367694.sig-ad1.kch.remel.lan/160/0 May 17 14:32:09 ad1 named[611]: samba_dlz: allowing update of signer=dhcpuser\@KCH.REMEL.LAN name...

...ttps://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 >> article for dynamic dhcp updates on dns zones. DHCP is working but dns >> updates not: i have this messages on my syslog then dhcpoffer: > >> named[611]: samba_dlz: committed transaction on zone kch.remel.lan >> May 17 14:32:09 ad1 remel: DHCP-DNS Update failed: 01 >> > > The forward zone is getting updated but the reverse zone isn't, have > you created the reverse zone, it isn't created automatically. > > Rowland Thanks! Now, then i use /etc/dhcp/bin/dh...

...g/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 > >> article for dynamic dhcp updates on dns zones. DHCP is working but > >> dns updates not: i have this messages on my syslog then dhcpoffer: > > > >> named[611]: samba_dlz: committed transaction on zone kch.remel.lan > >> May 17 14:32:09 ad1 remel: DHCP-DNS Update failed: 01 > >> > > > > The forward zone is getting updated but the reverse zone isn't, have > > you created the reverse zone, it isn't created automatically. > > > > Rowland > &g...

...n later. > > > > > > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org?# 6.3+ > > > Fixes: b4a6bb3a67aa ("block: add a sanity check for non-write flush/fua bios") > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> > > > Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch at nvidia.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at amd.com> > > > Tested-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at amd.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1 at huawei.com> > > > --- > > > v4: > > > ?* add stable Cc...

...n later. > > > > > > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org?# 6.3+ > > > Fixes: b4a6bb3a67aa ("block: add a sanity check for non-write flush/fua bios") > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> > > > Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch at nvidia.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at amd.com> > > > Tested-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta at amd.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1 at huawei.com> > > > --- > > > v4: > > > ?* add stable Cc...

...*RnBHJ zrqel#<%qm6T+o}8WldQ%*rvg{xV~nsrM8a7SzKfBUUL2RF4OrW#xm!*_{c?4sYnY! z`6&U<4Y_ at 7pT(6up15$HOP3zu*=L_Y>x48-+1lEmE*;aOLz*DCaPd)o{IQ3)y?emn z(E&HcBdXn-)L;H4N`jG+#3+g^B`;Enyicc-(;sx$=nv>`3>gdtY!3$vd;KUj*y%<o zv!WntHF*?qXb?icoKm!UDImTgiOuuxkf)!1hRc^Pv%S3?_W*?;NfNY<>KCh(>!K(~ zvlC|1jM;2PqAN08QzlF5%CIcwxW-a at k2Zpk7N9j}&+Z_E<I3fy(OQ#b30u7Zh0uiD z^JjkS&(Sd%&zh^;81D0?H$KAF#*p!J7Pn84ESF2h<1sgG-DGq$;^%+%2l!8Z>1SBf zj at f+9@wnpnV9MV95jT&<>>ccLbaKqe$qCcxn9*oPwR?o~C8;t%AWJk!qDf5>wdXoH zS(dRm*kosC3l{`$dHdT)vJ~e9`v)WX{ULd3NVIv$@o at...

depends on "autoconf: regenerate configure scripts with 4.4 version" This series removes some of the really old deadwood from the tools build and makes some other things which are on their way out configurable at build time with a default depending on how far down the slope I judge them to be. * nuke in tree copy of libaio * nuke obsolete tools: xsview, miniterm, lomount & sv *

Hi R-helpers, Does anyone know why adding which() makes the select call more efficient than just using logical selection in a dataframe? Doesn't which() technically add another conversion/function call on top of the logical selection? Here is a reproducible example with a slight difference in timing. # Surrogate data - the timing here isn't interesting urltext <-

...'s considered best practice to keep it. What is R inoking when which() isn't called explicitly? Is R invoking which() eventually anyway? Cheers! Keith > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 13:01:36 -0600 > From: Greg Snow <538280 at gmail.com> > To: "1/k^c" <kchamberln at gmail.com> > Cc: r-help <r-help at r-project.org> > Subject: Re: [R] which() vs. just logical selection in df > Message-ID: > <CAFEqCdyUuHh5TZ7t5NJ8cs_4xB61mNeUgasncekD485eBNRK6Q at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"...