search for: kbits

Hi First I must say that I`am an author of HTB auto-configurator (so I know some about QoS under linux) and I have read a lot of articles about HFSC, but I still don`t know how to configure this algoritm properly. Maybe somone can help me and write a little example for me (the best will be Patrick McHardy who has ported HFSC to linux) - please just three queues. My situation: Let say I have 1Mbit

Hello everyone, I''m a newbie experimenting with CBQ shaping and am facing a few problems. Can any of you please help? TEST SETUP: +---------------+ +----------------+ | 10.0.0.103 |----------->| 10.0.0.102 | +---------------+ +----------------+ 10.0.0.103: Linux, 100Mbit/s NIC 10.0.0.102: Windows, 100Mbit/s NIC, iperf tcp server (ports 2000 and 2001) WHAT I

Hello ! I use Slackware Linux on a box for routing and SNAT for a small network: |eth0: 80.97.108.1| | | |eth1: 192.168.1.1| ..........| my network (192.168.1.0/24)| I search for a tool show-me on real time the trafic made by all/one IPon the interface eth1, somethings simple ; EX: 192.168.1.10 ........... x kbit/s 192.168.1.11 ........... y kbit/s 192.168.1.12

Hi, We have a 256 kbits/s (kilobits per second) link to the internet. it is a router running Linux that belongs to our ISP. They have given us 8 internet ips. (i.e- subnet is 255.255.255.248). one has been given to this router. I have given another internet ip to the firewall running CentOS 4.5. iptables is running on it...

>Dear Speex developers >I am going to port Speex on LPC2368 >I tested Speex encoding and the mesurments shows ~40ms cpu time for one >frame >Do you know who ported speex to NXP or other 32bit platform? >Best Regards >Zohar fox I have an own optimisation for Speex for different versions of ARM architecture. Here is Measurements of performance for STM32 72 MHz. 4000

Hi, I have a CENTOS BOX as a firewall . both iptabes and iproute 2 are running on it. pls see bleow for installed RPMs. [root at firebox ~]# rpm -qa |grep iptables iptables-1.2.11-3.1.RHEL4 [root at firebox ~]# rpm -qa |grep iproute iproute-2.6.9-3.EL4.7 It has 3 ethernet cards. pls see below. eth0 - internet ip (pls asume. 1.2.3.4/29 ). it connects to ISP router. eth1 - 192.168.100.254

...> the beginning of your previous script. > > > > ------------------------------ > From: *"Indunil Jayasooriya" <indunil75@gmail.com>* > To: *"Pio Mendez" <pio_mendez@hotmail.com>, lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl* > Subject: *Re: [LARTC] Allocating 64 kbits/s out of 256 kbits/s for one > LAN behingfirewall* > Date: *Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:30:59 +0530* > > Hi Paolo Malfatti, > > > Thanks for your script. I tried it . > > But I still can not allocate 64 kbit for LAN. We have a 256 kbit link. > We usually download around @ 30...

Hello to all speex developers, I have question regarding payload length of narrowband speex in RTP. I were watching tcpdump of the xlite softphone and have found that it uses weird payload length namely 75 Bytes I went through various source and without success. To be clear: For 8000Hz sample in 20 ms that is 160 samples per frame. This makes 50 frames per sec. modes bit-rate 8 kbit/s

Hi. I am trying to shape my upstream bandwidth, mostly per port. and I am having some problems getting things to work the way I want them to. before I throw my configuration at you guys ;), I`d like to debug it by myself - but I was not able to find a tool that allow me to monitor current bandwidth usage per port (and preferably even per port+ip). I want to know what is the current bandwidth

Hi all, I''ve got a BOX running CentOS 4.5. It acts as a firewall + router. I have installed both iptables and iproute2. I has 3 network cards. eth0 is connected to Internet (is has an internet ip. pls assume its ip is 1.2.3.4/29). it is a 256 Kbit link. eth1 is DMZ. its ip is 192.168.100.254 eth2 is LAN. Its ip is 192.168.101.254 I have alreday shaped traffic to 64 Kbit on eth1 for

Hi, im using this script to shape traffic as I want..i get this log on the kernel Log: HTB: quantum of class 10020 is big. Consider r2q change. HTB init, kernel part version 3.13 HTB init, kernel part version 3.13 How worryed should I be :) ??? Thanks people!? #!/bin/bash -x fast_mark=1 ultra_fast_mark=2 slow_mark=3 interfaz_externa="eth1"

I''m trying to build a QoS system that would divide the outgoing traffic into four categories, each one also subdivided into two more categories. For that I chose a htb root qdisc subdivided into four classes, each of these classes contains also a htb qdisc. Until these point everything goes well, but when I try to attach a new class to the leaf htb qdisc a problem with the sintaxis

hi all, i saw this message today & am reporting it(as it says) [root@cab1 surfNet]# tail -f /var/log/messages Sep 1 04:02:03 cab1 syslogd 1.4.1: restart. Sep 1 09:35:27 cab1 kernel: HTB: mindelay=500, report it please ! [root@cab1 root]# iptables -V iptables v1.2.6a [root@cab1 root]# tc -V tc utility, iproute2-ss020116 [root@cab1 root]# uname -a Linux cab1 2.4.19-r #2 Sun Aug 25 01:49:24

Looks good to me. Jean-Marc Alfred E. Heggestad a ?crit : > Hi > > Please find an updated version of the Speex I-D attached. The only > change is addition of the copyright conditions in Appendix A, > as requested by Ivo. > > Many thanks for your input. > > I will give you a few more days before submitting to AVT working group > > > /alfred > > Ivo

I had expected that the default bitrate for the encoder would be the same as setting it to OPUS_AUTO, but I'm getting difference results: >opusenc --comp 4 sample.wav sample.opus Encoding using libopus 1.3-rc2 (audio) ----------------------------------------------------- Input: 8 kHz, 1 channel Output: 1 channel (1 uncoupled) 20ms packets, 25 kbit/s VBR Preskip: 312

Alfred E. Heggestad wrote: > <...> > > If we don't get any comments in 1 week (by 22. May 2007) we will go ahead > and submit it to the IETF. Of course you can comment on it also after it > has been submitted, but we would like to get the input from the Speex > community first.. > thanks for all the input. please find attached an updated version of the draft. I

Do not forget to add the "Copying conditions" to the RFC. Check http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments That page contains a section titled "Template for RFC authors to release additional rights". To follow that guideline a section like the following should be added: x. Copying conditions The author(s) agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to

Hello, I’ve read this Article avout VOIP and HFSC http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/ I’ve got few questions ? Considering this tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc \ rt m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ls m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[3*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ul rate ${UPLINK}kbit rt = realtime curve ls = linksharing curve but m1 = ? m2 = ? d =

hi there, is there any possible way to control traffic in child??? class with selected protocols for example http i try to use this script but its now working in theory: there is root class 1:0 with subclass 1:2 in class 1:2 all ip adresses have their bandwidth limit 1:{iden} and now i try also control bandwith in this class i.e. if class 1:{iden} have 190kbit i want 95kbit with burst to 190kbit

hi there, is there any possible way to control traffic in child??? class with selected protocols for example http i try to use this script but its now working in theory: there is root class 1:0 with subclass 1:2 in class 1:2 all ip adresses have their bandwidth limit 1:{iden} and now i try also control bandwith in this class i.e. if class 1:{iden} have 190kbit i want 95kbit with burst to 190kbit