Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "jwiegley".
Did you mean:
wiegley
2011 Oct 08
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
>>>>> Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> writes:
> I do not know the history here, but I do not see a problem with you setting
> up a buildbot. Did someone specifically object?
I think it was simply that no one responded.
> However, buildbots do require that someone is actively watching them and
> helping if breakage occurs (ie. developers may not have access
2011 Oct 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
On Oct 7, 2011, at 1:29 AM, John Wiegley wrote:
>>>>>> Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes:
>
>> If we had a larger set of volunteers that could help qualify releases AND
>> buildbots to continuously test the new release criteria, then we are willing
>> to expand this criteria. We haven't had a lot of volunteers step up in this
>> area
2011 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Release: Two Weeks 'Til 3.0 Branch
>>>>> Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes:
> If we had a larger set of volunteers that could help qualify releases AND
> buildbots to continuously test the new release criteria, then we are willing
> to expand this criteria. We haven't had a lot of volunteers step up in this
> area though.
Just to note, BoostPro has already expressed a willing to run