search for: julianfamily

Hi, I've got Gluster error: Transport endpoint not connected. It came up twice after trying to rsync 2 TB filesystem over; it reached about 1.8 TB and got the error. Logs on the server side (on reverse time order): [2012-12-15 00:53:24.747934] I [server-helpers.c:629:server_connection_destroy] 0-RedhawkShared-server: destroyed connection of

In IRC today, someone who was hitting that same IB performance ceiling that occasionally gets reported had this to say [11:50] <nissim> first, I ran fedora which is not supported by Mellanox OFED distro [11:50] <nissim> so I moved to CentOS 6.3 [11:51] <nissim> next I removed all distibution related infiniband rpms and build the latest OFED package [11:52] <nissim>

...espond on this thread or to me & Niels in private providing more details about your deployment? Details like OpenStack & Gluster versions, number of Gluster nodes & total storage capactiy would be very useful to us. Thanks! Vijay On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> wrote: > On 05/30/2017 03:52 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: > > On 05/30/2017 06:37 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > On 05/30/2017 03:24 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: > > On 05/27/2017 03:02 AM, Joe Julian wrote: > > On 05/26/2017 11:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > &gt...

Yeah I saw that, which is what brought me to the mailing list. Ta From: Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> To: Jonathan Archer <jf_archer at yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, 21 November 2017, 14:04 Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Ganesha or Storhaug Not according to storehaug's GitHub page: > Currently this is a WIP content dump. If you want to get this up and running, don't hesi...

...9;d probably rolling restart our three node gluster > clusters every few weeks or so depending on what patches have been > released etc... > > -- > Sam McLeod > https://smcleod.net > https://twitter.com/s_mcleod > >> On 29 Dec 2017, at 11:08 am, Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org >> <mailto:joe at julianfamily.org>> wrote: >> >> The reason for the long (42 second) ping-timeout is because >> re-establishing fd's and locks can be a very expensive operation. >> With an average MTBF of 45000 hours for a server, even just a repli...

...or in the Gerrit review history (https://review.gluster.org/#/c/7569/, https://review.gluster.org/#/c/8007/) for WHY you make sure ping-timeout is not default. Can anyone tell me the reason? Thanks for your help! Kind regards, Omar -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Joe Julian [mailto:joe at julianfamily.org] Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Dezember 2017 06:35 An: Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> Cc: Gluster Users <gluster-users at gluster.org>; Omar Kohl <omar.kohl at iternity.com> Betreff: Re: [Gluster-users] Exact purpose of network.ping-timeout Restarts will go through a shut...

...anks for the replies Joe. Yes, it does seem that Gluster is a very in-demand expertise. And it's hard to justify the cost of Red Hat's commercial offering without first putting a POC in place to confirm viability. Thanks again, HB On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> wrote: > Yeah, unfortunately that's all that have come forward as available. I > think the demand for gluster expertise is just so high and the pool of > experts so low that there's nobody left to do consulting work. > > On 12/18/2017 12:04 PM, Herb Burnswell wrote:...

...s-request at gluster.org > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Sent: Friday, March 1, 2013 4:03:13 PM > Subject: Gluster-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 15 > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 10:22:21 -0800 > From: Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] GlusterFS performance > Message-ID: <5130F1DD.9050602 at julianfamily.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" > > The kernel developers introduced a...

...grated as is effective. So in reality, I'd probably rolling restart our three node gluster clusters every few weeks or so depending on what patches have been released etc... -- Sam McLeod https://smcleod.net https://twitter.com/s_mcleod > On 29 Dec 2017, at 11:08 am, Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> wrote: > > The reason for the long (42 second) ping-timeout is because re-establishing fd's and locks can be a very expensive operation. With an average MTBF of 45000 hours for a server, even just a replica 2 would result in a 42 second MTTR every 2.6 years, or 6 nines of uptime....

Yeah, unfortunately that's all that have come forward as available. I think the demand for gluster expertise is just so high and the pool of experts so low that there's nobody left to do consulting work. On 12/18/2017 12:04 PM, Herb Burnswell wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, I just saw the post > <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2017-December/033053.html>

Greetings, I'm running v3.3.0 on Fedora16-x86_64. I used to have a replicated volume on two bricks. This morning I deleted it successfully: ######## [root at farm-ljf0 ~]# gluster volume stop gv0 Stopping volume will make its data inaccessible. Do you want to continue? (y/n) y Stopping volume gv0 has been successful [root at farm-ljf0 ~]# gluster volume delete gv0 Deleting volume will erase

> Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:29:41 -0700 > From: Harry Mangalam <hjmangalam at gmail.com> > Subject: [Gluster-users] Change NFS parameters post-start > To: gluster-users <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Message-ID: > <CAEib2OnKfENr8NhVwkvpsw21C5QJmzu_=C9j144p2Gkn7KP=LQ at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >

...Jo ? -----Original message----- From:Vijay Bellur <vbellur at redhat.com> Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 18:16 Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs To:Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>; CC:gluster-users at gluster.org; Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org>; On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com <mailto:jo.goossens at hosted-power.com> > wrote: Hello Joe, ? ? I just did a mount like this (added the bold): ? mount -t glusterfs -o attribute-timeout=600,entry-timeout=600,negative-time...

...faster than nfs !! What the hell!??! ? I'm so exited I already post. Any suggestions for those parameters? I will do additional testing over here , because this is ridiculous. That woud mean defaults or no good at all... ? Regards Jo ? -----Original message----- From:Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 17:16 Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs To:Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>; gluster-users at gluster.org; On 07/11/2017 08:14 AM, Jo Goossens wrote: Hello Joe, ? ? I really appreciate your...

hi, all: I'm now working on constructing KVM servers based on glusterfs. After many times searching on web, i found just a little information for this task, so I had to write this email for seeking systematically instruction of how to make glusterfs and KVM working together perfectly. And here are some questions I can not find any clearly answers: 1. what are the

Isn't this just brick multiplexing? On June 19, 2017 5:55:54 AM PDT, Atin Mukherjee <amukherj at redhat.com> wrote: >On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Yong Zhang <hiscal at outlook.com> wrote: > >> Hi, all >> >> >> >> I found two of my bricks from different volumes are using the same >port >> 49154 on the same glusterfs server node, is

...mount now and out of the box it's comparable with > gluster with nfs mount. > > Regards > > Jo > > BE: +32 53 599 000 > > NL: +31 85 888 4 555 > > https://www.hosted-power.com/ > > > -----Original message----- > *From:* Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> > *Sent:* Tue 11-07-2017 17:04 > *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow > compared to nfs > *To:* gluster-users at gluster.org; > > My standard response to someone needing filesystem performance for > www traffic is ge...

...>/<full gfid> Please provide the getfatr output of the file which is in split brain. The steps to recover from split-brain can be found here, http://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Troubleshooting/resolving-splitbrain/ HTH, Karthik On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> wrote: > How do I find what "eafb8799-4e7a-4264-9213-26997c5a4693" is? > > https://docs.gluster.org/en/v3/Troubleshooting/gfid-to-path/ > > On May 21, 2018 3:22:01 PM PDT, Thing <thing.thing at gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I seem to hav...

...most there is something really wrong somehow... ? I tried the ceph mount now and out of the box it's comparable with gluster with nfs mount. ? ? Regards Jo ? BE: +32 53 599 000 NL: +31 85 888 4 555 ? https://www.hosted-power.com/ ? ? -----Original message----- From:Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 17:04 Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs To:gluster-users at gluster.org; My standard response to someone needing filesystem performance for www traffic is generally, "you're doing it wrong". https://joejulia...

...the getfatr output of the file which is in split brain. > The steps to recover from split-brain can be found here, > http://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Troubleshooting/ > resolving-splitbrain/ > > HTH, > Karthik > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 4:03 AM, Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> wrote: > >> How do I find what "eafb8799-4e7a-4264-9213-26997c5a4693" is? >> >> https://docs.gluster.org/en/v3/Troubleshooting/gfid-to-path/ >> >> >> On May 21, 2018 3:22:01 PM PDT, Thing <thing.thing at gmail.com> wrote: >> &gt...