thr3ads.net - Gluster users - [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs [Jul 2017]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Jo Goossens

2017-Jul-11 14:48 UTC

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

Hello,

?
?
Here is the volume info as requested by soumya:

?
#gluster volume info www
?Volume Name: www
Type: Replicate
Volume ID: 5d64ee36-828a-41fa-adbf-75718b954aff
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: 192.168.140.41:/gluster/www
Brick2: 192.168.140.42:/gluster/www
Brick3: 192.168.140.43:/gluster/www
Options Reconfigured:
cluster.read-hash-mode: 0
performance.quick-read: on
performance.write-behind-window-size: 4MB
server.allow-insecure: on
performance.read-ahead: disable
performance.readdir-ahead: on
performance.io-thread-count: 64
performance.io-cache: on
performance.client-io-threads: on
server.outstanding-rpc-limit: 128
server.event-threads: 3
client.event-threads: 3
performance.cache-size: 32MB
transport.address-family: inet
nfs.disable: on
nfs.addr-namelookup: off
nfs.export-volumes: on
nfs.rpc-auth-allow: 192.168.140.*
features.cache-invalidation: on
features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600
performance.stat-prefetch: on
performance.cache-samba-metadata: on
performance.cache-invalidation: on
performance.md-cache-timeout: 600
network.inode-lru-limit: 100000
performance.parallel-readdir: on
performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60
performance.rda-cache-limit: 50MB
cluster.nufa: on
network.ping-timeout: 5
cluster.lookup-optimize: on
cluster.quorum-type: auto
?I started with none of them set and I added/changed while testing. But it was
always slow, by tuning some kernel parameters it improved slightly (just a few
percent, nothing reasonable)
?I also tried ceph just to compare, I got this with default settings and no
tweaks:
??./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8
--files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64
smallfile version 3.0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41']
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?top test directory(s) : ['/var/www/test']
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?operation : cleanup
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? files/thread : 5000
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?threads : 8
? ? ? ? ? ?record size (KB, 0 = maximum) : 64
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size (KB) : 64
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size distribution : fixed
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?files per dir : 100
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dirs per dir : 10
? ? ? ? ? ? ? threads share directories? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename prefix :
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename suffix :
? ? ? ? ? ? ?hash file number into dir.? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fsync after modify? : N
? ? ? ? ? pause between files (microsec) : 0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? finish all requests? : Y
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? stonewall? : Y
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?measure response times? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verify read? : Y
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verbose? : False
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? log to stderr? : False
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ext.attr.size : 0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ext.attr.count : 0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?permute host directories? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? remote program directory : /root/smallfile-master
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?network thread sync. dir. : /var/www/test/network_shared
starting all threads by creating starting gate file
/var/www/test/network_shared/starting_gate.tmp
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 00,elapsed = 1.339621,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 01,elapsed = 1.436776,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 02,elapsed = 1.498681,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 03,elapsed = 1.483886,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 04,elapsed = 1.454833,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 05,elapsed = 1.469340,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 06,elapsed = 1.439060,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 07,elapsed = 1.375074,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
total threads = 8
total files = 40000
100.00% of requested files processed, minimum is ?70.00
1.498681 sec elapsed time
26690.134975 files/sec
??
Regards

Jo

?
-----Original message-----
From:Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>
Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 12:15
Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs
To:Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com>; gluster-users at gluster.org; 
CC:Ambarish Soman <asoman at redhat.com>; 
 

Hello,

?
?
Here is some speedtest with a new setup we just made with gluster 3.10, there
are no other differences, except glusterfs versus nfs. The nfs is about 80 times
faster:

?
?
root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t glusterfs -o
use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log
192.168.140.41:/www /var/www
root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test
--host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 500 --file-size 64 --record-size
64
smallfile version 3.0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41']
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?top test directory(s) : ['/var/www/test']
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?operation : cleanup
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? files/thread : 500
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?threads : 8
? ? ? ? ? ?record size (KB, 0 = maximum) : 64
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size (KB) : 64
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size distribution : fixed
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?files per dir : 100
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dirs per dir : 10
? ? ? ? ? ? ? threads share directories? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename prefix :
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename suffix :
? ? ? ? ? ? ?hash file number into dir.? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fsync after modify? : N
? ? ? ? ? pause between files (microsec) : 0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? finish all requests? : Y
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? stonewall? : Y
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?measure response times? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verify read? : Y
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verbose? : False
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? log to stderr? : False
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ext.attr.size : 0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ext.attr.count : 0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?permute host directories? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? remote program directory : /root/smallfile-master
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?network thread sync. dir. : /var/www/test/network_shared
starting all threads by creating starting gate file
/var/www/test/network_shared/starting_gate.tmp
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 00,elapsed = 68.845450,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 01,elapsed = 67.601088,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 02,elapsed = 58.677994,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 03,elapsed = 65.901922,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 04,elapsed = 66.971720,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 05,elapsed = 71.245102,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 06,elapsed = 67.574845,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 07,elapsed = 54.263242,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
total threads = 8
total files = 4000
100.00% of requested files processed, minimum is ?70.00
71.245102 sec elapsed time
56.144211 files/sec
?umount /var/www
?root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t nfs -o tcp 192.168.140.41:/www
/var/www
root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test
--host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 500 --file-size 64 --record-size
64
smallfile version 3.0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41']
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?top test directory(s) : ['/var/www/test']
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?operation : cleanup
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? files/thread : 500
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?threads : 8
? ? ? ? ? ?record size (KB, 0 = maximum) : 64
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size (KB) : 64
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size distribution : fixed
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?files per dir : 100
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dirs per dir : 10
? ? ? ? ? ? ? threads share directories? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename prefix :
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename suffix :
? ? ? ? ? ? ?hash file number into dir.? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fsync after modify? : N
? ? ? ? ? pause between files (microsec) : 0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? finish all requests? : Y
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? stonewall? : Y
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?measure response times? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verify read? : Y
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verbose? : False
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? log to stderr? : False
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ext.attr.size : 0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ext.attr.count : 0
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?permute host directories? : N
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? remote program directory : /root/smallfile-master
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?network thread sync. dir. : /var/www/test/network_shared
starting all threads by creating starting gate file
/var/www/test/network_shared/starting_gate.tmp
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 00,elapsed = 0.962424,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 01,elapsed = 0.942673,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 02,elapsed = 0.940622,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 03,elapsed = 0.915218,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 04,elapsed = 0.934349,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 05,elapsed = 0.922466,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 06,elapsed = 0.954381,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 07,elapsed = 0.946127,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
total threads = 8
total files = 4000
100.00% of requested files processed, minimum is ?70.00
0.962424 sec elapsed time
4156.173189 files/sec
??
?
-----Original message-----
From:Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>
Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 11:26
Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs
To:gluster-users at gluster.org; Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com>; 
CC:Ambarish Soman <asoman at redhat.com>; 
 

Hi all,

?
?
One more thing, we have 3 apps servers with the gluster on it, replicated on 3
different gluster nodes. (So the gluster nodes are app servers at the same
time). We could actually almost work locally if we wouldn't need to have the
same files on the 3 nodes and redundancy :)

?
Initial cluster was created like this:

?
gluster volume create www replica 3 transport tcp 192.168.140.41:/gluster/www
192.168.140.42:/gluster/www 192.168.140.43:/gluster/www force
gluster volume set www network.ping-timeout 5
gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1024MB
gluster volume set www nfs.disable on # No need for NFS currently
gluster volume start www
?To my understanding it still wouldn't explain why nfs has such great
performance compared to native ...
??
Regards

Jo

?

?
-----Original message-----
From:Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com>
Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 11:16
Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs
To:Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>; gluster-users at
gluster.org;
CC:Ambarish Soman <asoman at redhat.com>; Karan Sandha <ksandha at
redhat.com>;
+ Ambarish

On 07/11/2017 02:31 PM, Jo Goossens wrote:> Hello,
>
>
>
>
>
> We tried tons of settings to get a php app running on a native gluster
> mount:
>
>
>
> e.g.: 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www glusterfs
>
defaults,_netdev,backup-volfile-servers=192.168.140.42:192.168.140.43,direct-io-mode=disable
> 0 0
>
>
>
> I tried some mount variants in order to speed up things without luck.
>
>
>
>
>
> After that I tried nfs (native gluster nfs 3 and ganesha nfs 4), it was
> a crazy performance difference.
>
>
>
> e.g.: 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www nfs4 defaults,_netdev 0 0
>
>
>
> I tried a test like this to confirm the slowness:
>
>
>
> ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41
> --threads 8 --files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64
>
> This test finished in around 1.5 seconds with NFS and in more than 250
> seconds without nfs (can't remember exact numbers, but I reproduced it
> several times for both).
>
> With the native gluster mount the php app had loading times of over 10
> seconds, with the nfs mount the php app loaded around 1 second maximum
> and even less. (reproduced several times)
>
>
>
> I tried all kind of performance settings and variants of this but not
> helped , the difference stayed huge, here are some of the settings
> played with in random order:
>
Request Ambarish & Karan (cc'ed who have been working on evaluating 
performance of various access protocols gluster supports) to look at the 
below settings and provide inputs.

Thanks,
Soumya
>
>
> gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation on
> gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation-timeout 600
> gluster volume set www performance.stat-prefetch on
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-samba-metadata on
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-invalidation on
> gluster volume set www performance.md-cache-timeout 600
> gluster volume set www network.inode-lru-limit 250000
>
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-refresh-timeout 60
> gluster volume set www performance.read-ahead disable
> gluster volume set www performance.readdir-ahead on
> gluster volume set www performance.parallel-readdir on
> gluster volume set www performance.write-behind-window-size 4MB
> gluster volume set www performance.io-thread-count 64
>
> gluster volume set www performance.client-io-threads on
>
> gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1GB
> gluster volume set www performance.quick-read on
> gluster volume set www performance.flush-behind on
> gluster volume set www performance.write-behind on
> gluster volume set www nfs.disable on
>
> gluster volume set www client.event-threads 3
> gluster volume set www server.event-threads 3
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The NFS ha adds a lot of complexity which we wouldn't need at all in
our
> setup, could you please explain what is going on here? Is NFS the only
> solution to get acceptable performance? Did I miss one crucial settting
> perhaps?
>
>
>
> We're really desperate, thanks a lot for your help!
>
>
>
>
>
> PS: We tried with gluster 3.11 and 3.8 on Debian, both had terrible
> performance when not used with nfs.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Jo Goossens
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 


 _______________________________________________
 Gluster-users mailing list
 Gluster-users at gluster.org
 http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

 
 


_______________________________________________
 Gluster-users mailing list
 Gluster-users at gluster.org
 http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170711/63a8428a/attachment.html>

Joe Julian

2017-Jul-11 15:04 UTC

head link

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

My standard response to someone needing filesystem performance for www 
traffic is generally, "you're doing it wrong". 
https://joejulian.name/blog/optimizing-web-performance-with-glusterfs/

That said, you might also look at these mount options: 
attribute-timeout, entry-timeout, negative-timeout (set to some large 
amount of time), and fopen-keep-cache.


On 07/11/2017 07:48 AM, Jo Goossens wrote:> RE: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is the volume info as requested by soumya:
>
> #gluster volume info www
> Volume Name: www
> Type: Replicate
> Volume ID: 5d64ee36-828a-41fa-adbf-75718b954aff
> Status: Started
> Snapshot Count: 0
> Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3
> Transport-type: tcp
> Bricks:
> Brick1: 192.168.140.41:/gluster/www
> Brick2: 192.168.140.42:/gluster/www
> Brick3: 192.168.140.43:/gluster/www
> Options Reconfigured:
> cluster.read-hash-mode: 0
> performance.quick-read: on
> performance.write-behind-window-size: 4MB
> server.allow-insecure: on
> performance.read-ahead: disable
> performance.readdir-ahead: on
> performance.io-thread-count: 64
> performance.io-cache: on
> performance.client-io-threads: on
> server.outstanding-rpc-limit: 128
> server.event-threads: 3
> client.event-threads: 3
> performance.cache-size: 32MB
> transport.address-family: inet
> nfs.disable: on
> nfs.addr-namelookup: off
> nfs.export-volumes: on
> nfs.rpc-auth-allow: 192.168.140.*
> features.cache-invalidation: on
> features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600
> performance.stat-prefetch: on
> performance.cache-samba-metadata: on
> performance.cache-invalidation: on
> performance.md-cache-timeout: 600
> network.inode-lru-limit: 100000
> performance.parallel-readdir: on
> performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60
> performance.rda-cache-limit: 50MB
> cluster.nufa: on
> network.ping-timeout: 5
> cluster.lookup-optimize: on
> cluster.quorum-type: auto
> I started with none of them set and I added/changed while testing. But 
> it was always slow, by tuning some kernel parameters it improved 
> slightly (just a few percent, nothing reasonable)
> I also tried ceph just to compare, I got this with default settings 
> and no tweaks:
>  ./smallfile_cli.py  --top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 
> --threads 8 --files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64
> smallfile version 3.0
>                            hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41']
>                    top test directory(s) : ['/var/www/test']
>                                operation : cleanup
>                             files/thread : 5000
>                                  threads : 8
>            record size (KB, 0 = maximum) : 64
>                           file size (KB) : 64
>                   file size distribution : fixed
>                            files per dir : 100
>                             dirs per dir : 10
>               threads share directories? : N
>                          filename prefix :
>                          filename suffix :
>              hash file number into dir.? : N
>                      fsync after modify? : N
>           pause between files (microsec) : 0
>                     finish all requests? : Y
>                               stonewall? : Y
>                  measure response times? : N
>                             verify read? : Y
>                                 verbose? : False
>                           log to stderr? : False
>                            ext.attr.size : 0
>                           ext.attr.count : 0
>                permute host directories? : N
>                 remote program directory : /root/smallfile-master
>                network thread sync. dir. : /var/www/test/network_shared
> starting all threads by creating starting gate file 
> /var/www/test/network_shared/starting_gate.tmp
> host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 00,elapsed = 1.339621,files = 5000,records 
> = 0,status = ok
> host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 01,elapsed = 1.436776,files = 5000,records 
> = 0,status = ok
> host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 02,elapsed = 1.498681,files = 5000,records 
> = 0,status = ok
> host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 03,elapsed = 1.483886,files = 5000,records 
> = 0,status = ok
> host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 04,elapsed = 1.454833,files = 5000,records 
> = 0,status = ok
> host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 05,elapsed = 1.469340,files = 5000,records 
> = 0,status = ok
> host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 06,elapsed = 1.439060,files = 5000,records 
> = 0,status = ok
> host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 07,elapsed = 1.375074,files = 5000,records 
> = 0,status = ok
> total threads = 8
> total files = 40000
> 100.00% of requested files processed, minimum is  70.00
> 1.498681 sec elapsed time
> 26690.134975 files/sec
>
>
> Regards
>
> Jo
>
>     -----Original message-----
>     *From:* Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>
>     *Sent:* Tue 11-07-2017 12:15
>     *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow
>     compared to nfs
>     *To:* Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com>; gluster-users at
gluster.org;
>     *CC:* Ambarish Soman <asoman at redhat.com>;
>
>     Hello,
>
>     Here is some speedtest with a new setup we just made with gluster
>     3.10, there are no other differences, except glusterfs versus nfs.
>     The nfs is about 80 times faster:
>
>     root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t glusterfs -o
>     use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log
>     192.168.140.41:/www /var/www
>     root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py  --top
>     /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 500
>     --file-size 64 --record-size 64
>     smallfile version 3.0
>                                hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41']
>                        top test directory(s) : ['/var/www/test']
>                                    operation : cleanup
>                                 files/thread : 500
>                                      threads : 8
>                record size (KB, 0 = maximum) : 64
>                               file size (KB) : 64
>                       file size distribution : fixed
>                                files per dir : 100
>                                 dirs per dir : 10
>                   threads share directories? : N
>                              filename prefix :
>                              filename suffix :
>                  hash file number into dir.? : N
>                          fsync after modify? : N
>               pause between files (microsec) : 0
>                         finish all requests? : Y
>                                   stonewall? : Y
>                      measure response times? : N
>                                 verify read? : Y
>                                     verbose? : False
>                               log to stderr? : False
>                                ext.attr.size : 0
>                               ext.attr.count : 0
>                    permute host directories? : N
>                     remote program directory : /root/smallfile-master
>                    network thread sync. dir. :
>     /var/www/test/network_shared
>     starting all threads by creating starting gate file
>     /var/www/test/network_shared/starting_gate.tmp
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 00,elapsed = 68.845450,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 01,elapsed = 67.601088,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 02,elapsed = 58.677994,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 03,elapsed = 65.901922,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 04,elapsed = 66.971720,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 05,elapsed = 71.245102,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 06,elapsed = 67.574845,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 07,elapsed = 54.263242,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     total threads = 8
>     total files = 4000
>     100.00% of requested files processed, minimum is  70.00
>     71.245102 sec elapsed time
>     56.144211 files/sec
>     umount /var/www
>     root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t nfs -o tcp
>     192.168.140.41:/www /var/www
>     root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py  --top
>     /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 500
>     --file-size 64 --record-size 64
>     smallfile version 3.0
>                                hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41']
>                        top test directory(s) : ['/var/www/test']
>                                    operation : cleanup
>                                 files/thread : 500
>                                      threads : 8
>                record size (KB, 0 = maximum) : 64
>                               file size (KB) : 64
>                       file size distribution : fixed
>                                files per dir : 100
>                                 dirs per dir : 10
>                   threads share directories? : N
>                              filename prefix :
>                              filename suffix :
>                  hash file number into dir.? : N
>                          fsync after modify? : N
>               pause between files (microsec) : 0
>                         finish all requests? : Y
>                                   stonewall? : Y
>                      measure response times? : N
>                                 verify read? : Y
>                                     verbose? : False
>                               log to stderr? : False
>                                ext.attr.size : 0
>                               ext.attr.count : 0
>                    permute host directories? : N
>                     remote program directory : /root/smallfile-master
>                    network thread sync. dir. :
>     /var/www/test/network_shared
>     starting all threads by creating starting gate file
>     /var/www/test/network_shared/starting_gate.tmp
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 00,elapsed = 0.962424,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 01,elapsed = 0.942673,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 02,elapsed = 0.940622,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 03,elapsed = 0.915218,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 04,elapsed = 0.934349,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 05,elapsed = 0.922466,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 06,elapsed = 0.954381,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 07,elapsed = 0.946127,files >    
500,records = 0,status = ok
>     total threads = 8
>     total files = 4000
>     100.00% of requested files processed, minimum is  70.00
>     0.962424 sec elapsed time
>     4156.173189 files/sec
>
>         -----Original message-----
>         *From:* Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>
>         *Sent:* Tue 11-07-2017 11:26
>         *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really
>         slow compared to nfs
>         *To:* gluster-users at gluster.org; Soumya Koduri
>         <skoduri at redhat.com>;
>         *CC:* Ambarish Soman <asoman at redhat.com>;
>
>         Hi all,
>
>         One more thing, we have 3 apps servers with the gluster on it,
>         replicated on 3 different gluster nodes. (So the gluster nodes
>         are app servers at the same time). We could actually almost
>         work locally if we wouldn't need to have the same files on the
>         3 nodes and redundancy :)
>
>         Initial cluster was created like this:
>
>         gluster volume create www replica 3 transport tcp
>         192.168.140.41:/gluster/www 192.168.140.42:/gluster/www
>         192.168.140.43:/gluster/www force
>         gluster volume set www network.ping-timeout 5
>         gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1024MB
>         gluster volume set www nfs.disable on # No need for NFS currently
>         gluster volume start www
>         To my understanding it still wouldn't explain why nfs has such
>         great performance compared to native ...
>
>         Regards
>
>         Jo
>
>
>             -----Original message-----
>             *From:* Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com>
>             *Sent:* Tue 11-07-2017 11:16
>             *Subject:* Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is
>             really slow compared to nfs
>             *To:* Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>;
>             gluster-users at gluster.org;
>             *CC:* Ambarish Soman <asoman at redhat.com>; Karan Sandha
>             <ksandha at redhat.com>;
>             + Ambarish
>
>             On 07/11/2017 02:31 PM, Jo Goossens wrote:
>             > Hello,
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > We tried tons of settings to get a php app running on a
>             native gluster
>             > mount:
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > e.g.: 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www glusterfs
>             >
>            
defaults,_netdev,backup-volfile-servers=192.168.140.42:192.168.140.43,direct-io-mode=disable
>             > 0 0
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > I tried some mount variants in order to speed up things
>             without luck.
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > After that I tried nfs (native gluster nfs 3 and ganesha
>             nfs 4), it was
>             > a crazy performance difference.
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > e.g.: 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www nfs4 defaults,_netdev 0
0
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > I tried a test like this to confirm the slowness:
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > ./smallfile_cli.py  --top /var/www/test --host-set
>             192.168.140.41
>             > --threads 8 --files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64
>             >
>             > This test finished in around 1.5 seconds with NFS and in
>             more than 250
>             > seconds without nfs (can't remember exact numbers, but
I
>             reproduced it
>             > several times for both).
>             >
>             > With the native gluster mount the php app had loading
>             times of over 10
>             > seconds, with the nfs mount the php app loaded around 1
>             second maximum
>             > and even less. (reproduced several times)
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > I tried all kind of performance settings and variants of
>             this but not
>             > helped , the difference stayed huge, here are some of
>             the settings
>             > played with in random order:
>             >
>
>             Request Ambarish & Karan (cc'ed who have been working
on
>             evaluating
>             performance of various access protocols gluster supports)
>             to look at the
>             below settings and provide inputs.
>
>             Thanks,
>             Soumya
>
>             >
>             >
>             > gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation on
>             > gluster volume set www
>             features.cache-invalidation-timeout 600
>             > gluster volume set www performance.stat-prefetch on
>             > gluster volume set www performance.cache-samba-metadata on
>             > gluster volume set www performance.cache-invalidation on
>             > gluster volume set www performance.md-cache-timeout 600
>             > gluster volume set www network.inode-lru-limit 250000
>             >
>             > gluster volume set www performance.cache-refresh-timeout
60
>             > gluster volume set www performance.read-ahead disable
>             > gluster volume set www performance.readdir-ahead on
>             > gluster volume set www performance.parallel-readdir on
>             > gluster volume set www
>             performance.write-behind-window-size 4MB
>             > gluster volume set www performance.io-thread-count 64
>             >
>             > gluster volume set www performance.client-io-threads on
>             >
>             > gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1GB
>             > gluster volume set www performance.quick-read on
>             > gluster volume set www performance.flush-behind on
>             > gluster volume set www performance.write-behind on
>             > gluster volume set www nfs.disable on
>             >
>             > gluster volume set www client.event-threads 3
>             > gluster volume set www server.event-threads 3
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > The NFS ha adds a lot of complexity which we wouldn't
>             need at all in our
>             > setup, could you please explain what is going on here?
>             Is NFS the only
>             > solution to get acceptable performance? Did I miss one
>             crucial settting
>             > perhaps?
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > We're really desperate, thanks a lot for your help!
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > PS: We tried with gluster 3.11 and 3.8 on Debian, both
>             had terrible
>             > performance when not used with nfs.
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > Kind regards
>             >
>             > Jo Goossens
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             >
>             > _______________________________________________
>             > Gluster-users mailing list
>             > Gluster-users at gluster.org
>             > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>             >
>
>           _______________________________________________
>           Gluster-users mailing list
>           Gluster-users at gluster.org
>           http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>     _______________________________________________
>       Gluster-users mailing list
>       Gluster-users at gluster.org
>       http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170711/da012618/attachment.html>

Jo Goossens

2017-Jul-11 15:14 UTC

head link

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

Hello Joe,

?
?
I really appreciate your feedback, but I already tried the opcache stuff (to not
valildate at all). It improves of course then, but not completely somehow. Still
quite slow.

?
I did not try the mount options yet, but I will now!

?
?
With nfs (doesnt matter much built-in version 3 or ganesha version 4) I can even
host the site perfectly fast without these extreme opcache settings.

?
I still can't understand why the nfs mount is easily 80 times faster,
actually no matter what options I set it seems. It's almost there is
something really wrong somehow...

?
I tried the ceph mount now and out of the box it's comparable with gluster
with nfs mount.

?
?
Regards

Jo

?
BE: +32 53 599 000

NL: +31 85 888 4 555

?
https://www.hosted-power.com/

?

?
-----Original message-----
From:Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org>
Sent:Tue 11-07-2017 17:04
Subject:Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs
To:gluster-users at gluster.org; 
 

My standard response to someone needing filesystem performance for www traffic
is generally, "you're doing it wrong".
https://joejulian.name/blog/optimizing-web-performance-with-glusterfs/
 
 That said, you might also look at these mount options: attribute-timeout,
entry-timeout, negative-timeout (set to some large amount of time), and
fopen-keep-cache.

 
 
On 07/11/2017 07:48 AM, Jo Goossens wrote:
 

Hello,

 

?
 

?
 

Here is the volume info as requested by soumya:

 

?
 
#gluster volume info www
 
? 
Volume Name: www
 
Type: Replicate
 
Volume ID: 5d64ee36-828a-41fa-adbf-75718b954aff
 
Status: Started
 
Snapshot Count: 0
 
Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3
 
Transport-type: tcp
 
Bricks:
 
Brick1: 192.168.140.41:/gluster/www
 
Brick2: 192.168.140.42:/gluster/www
 
Brick3: 192.168.140.43:/gluster/www
 
Options Reconfigured:
 
cluster.read-hash-mode: 0
 
performance.quick-read: on
 
performance.write-behind-window-size: 4MB
 
server.allow-insecure: on
 
performance.read-ahead: disable
 
performance.readdir-ahead: on
 
performance.io-thread-count: 64
 
performance.io-cache: on
 
performance.client-io-threads: on
 
server.outstanding-rpc-limit: 128
 
server.event-threads: 3
 
client.event-threads: 3
 
performance.cache-size: 32MB
 
transport.address-family: inet
 
nfs.disable: on
 
nfs.addr-namelookup: off
 
nfs.export-volumes: on
 
nfs.rpc-auth-allow: 192.168.140.*
 
features.cache-invalidation: on
 
features.cache-invalidation-timeout: 600
 
performance.stat-prefetch: on
 
performance.cache-samba-metadata: on
 
performance.cache-invalidation: on
 
performance.md-cache-timeout: 600
 
network.inode-lru-limit: 100000
 
performance.parallel-readdir: on
 
performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60
 
performance.rda-cache-limit: 50MB
 
cluster.nufa: on
 
network.ping-timeout: 5
 
cluster.lookup-optimize: on
 
cluster.quorum-type: auto
 
? 
I started with none of them set and I added/changed while testing. But it was
always slow, by tuning some kernel parameters it improved slightly (just a few
percent, nothing reasonable)
 
? 
I also tried ceph just to compare, I got this with default settings and no
tweaks:
 
? 
?./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8
--files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64
 
smallfile version 3.0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41']
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?top test directory(s) : ['/var/www/test']
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?operation : cleanup
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? files/thread : 5000
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?threads : 8
 
? ? ? ? ? ?record size (KB, 0 = maximum) : 64
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size (KB) : 64
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size distribution : fixed
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?files per dir : 100
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dirs per dir : 10
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? threads share directories? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename prefix :
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename suffix :
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ?hash file number into dir.? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fsync after modify? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? pause between files (microsec) : 0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? finish all requests? : Y
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? stonewall? : Y
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?measure response times? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verify read? : Y
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verbose? : False
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? log to stderr? : False
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ext.attr.size : 0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ext.attr.count : 0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?permute host directories? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? remote program directory : /root/smallfile-master
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?network thread sync. dir. : /var/www/test/network_shared
 
starting all threads by creating starting gate file
/var/www/test/network_shared/starting_gate.tmp
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 00,elapsed = 1.339621,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 01,elapsed = 1.436776,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 02,elapsed = 1.498681,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 03,elapsed = 1.483886,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 04,elapsed = 1.454833,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 05,elapsed = 1.469340,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 06,elapsed = 1.439060,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 07,elapsed = 1.375074,files = 5000,records =
0,status = ok
 
total threads = 8
 
total files = 40000
 
100.00% of requested files processed, minimum is ?70.00
 
1.498681 sec elapsed time
 
26690.134975 files/sec
 
? 
? 


 Regards

 

Jo

 

?
 -----Original message-----
 From: Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>
<mailto:jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>
 Sent: Tue 11-07-2017 12:15
 Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to
nfs
 To: Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com> <mailto:skoduri at
redhat.com> ; gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:gluster-users at
gluster.org> ;
 CC: Ambarish Soman <asoman at redhat.com> <mailto:asoman at
redhat.com> ;
 

Hello,

 

?
 

?
 

Here is some speedtest with a new setup we just made with gluster 3.10, there
are no other differences, except glusterfs versus nfs. The nfs is about 80 times
faster:

 

?
 

?
 
root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t glusterfs -o
use-readdirp=no,log-level=WARNING,log-file=/var/log/glusterxxx.log
192.168.140.41:/www /var/www
 
root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test
--host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 500 --file-size 64 --record-size
64
 
smallfile version 3.0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41']
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?top test directory(s) : ['/var/www/test']
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?operation : cleanup
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? files/thread : 500
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?threads : 8
 
? ? ? ? ? ?record size (KB, 0 = maximum) : 64
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size (KB) : 64
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size distribution : fixed
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?files per dir : 100
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dirs per dir : 10
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? threads share directories? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename prefix :
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename suffix :
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ?hash file number into dir.? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fsync after modify? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? pause between files (microsec) : 0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? finish all requests? : Y
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? stonewall? : Y
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?measure response times? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verify read? : Y
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verbose? : False
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? log to stderr? : False
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ext.attr.size : 0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ext.attr.count : 0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?permute host directories? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? remote program directory : /root/smallfile-master
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?network thread sync. dir. : /var/www/test/network_shared
 
starting all threads by creating starting gate file
/var/www/test/network_shared/starting_gate.tmp
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 00,elapsed = 68.845450,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 01,elapsed = 67.601088,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 02,elapsed = 58.677994,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 03,elapsed = 65.901922,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 04,elapsed = 66.971720,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 05,elapsed = 71.245102,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 06,elapsed = 67.574845,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 07,elapsed = 54.263242,files = 500,records =
0,status = ok
 
total threads = 8
 
total files = 4000
 
100.00% of requested files processed, minimum is ?70.00
 
71.245102 sec elapsed time
 
56.144211 files/sec
 
? 
umount /var/www
 
? 
root at app1:~/smallfile-master# mount -t nfs -o tcp 192.168.140.41:/www
/var/www
 
root at app1:~/smallfile-master# ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test
--host-set 192.168.140.41 --threads 8 --files 500 --file-size 64 --record-size
64
 
smallfile version 3.0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?hosts in test : ['192.168.140.41']
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?top test directory(s) : ['/var/www/test']
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?operation : cleanup
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? files/thread : 500
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?threads : 8
 
? ? ? ? ? ?record size (KB, 0 = maximum) : 64
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size (KB) : 64
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? file size distribution : fixed
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?files per dir : 100
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? dirs per dir : 10
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? threads share directories? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename prefix :
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?filename suffix :
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ?hash file number into dir.? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?fsync after modify? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? pause between files (microsec) : 0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? finish all requests? : Y
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? stonewall? : Y
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?measure response times? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verify read? : Y
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? verbose? : False
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? log to stderr? : False
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?ext.attr.size : 0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ext.attr.count : 0
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?permute host directories? : N
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? remote program directory : /root/smallfile-master
 
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?network thread sync. dir. : /var/www/test/network_shared
 
starting all threads by creating starting gate file
/var/www/test/network_shared/starting_gate.tmp
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 00,elapsed = 0.962424,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 01,elapsed = 0.942673,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 02,elapsed = 0.940622,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 03,elapsed = 0.915218,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 04,elapsed = 0.934349,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 05,elapsed = 0.922466,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 06,elapsed = 0.954381,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
 
host = 192.168.140.41,thr = 07,elapsed = 0.946127,files = 500,records = 0,status
= ok
 
total threads = 8
 
total files = 4000
 
100.00% of requested files processed, minimum is ?70.00
 
0.962424 sec elapsed time
 
4156.173189 files/sec
 
? 

?
 

?
 -----Original message-----
 From: Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>
<mailto:jo.goossens at hosted-power.com>
 Sent: Tue 11-07-2017 11:26
 Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to
nfs
 To: gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:gluster-users at gluster.org> ;
Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com> <mailto:skoduri at redhat.com>
;
 CC: Ambarish Soman <asoman at redhat.com> <mailto:asoman at
redhat.com> ;
 

Hi all,

 

?
 

?
 

One more thing, we have 3 apps servers with the gluster on it, replicated on 3
different gluster nodes. (So the gluster nodes are app servers at the same
time). We could actually almost work locally if we wouldn't need to have the
same files on the 3 nodes and redundancy :)

 

?
 

Initial cluster was created like this:

 

?
 
gluster volume create www replica 3 transport tcp 192.168.140.41:/gluster/www
192.168.140.42:/gluster/www 192.168.140.43:/gluster/www force
 
gluster volume set www network.ping-timeout 5
 
gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1024MB
 
gluster volume set www nfs.disable on # No need for NFS currently
 
gluster volume start www
 
? 
To my understanding it still wouldn't explain why nfs has such great
performance compared to native ...
 
? 

?
 

Regards

 

Jo

 

?
 


 ?

 -----Original message-----
 From: Soumya Koduri <skoduri at redhat.com> <mailto:skoduri at
redhat.com>
 Sent: Tue 11-07-2017 11:16
 Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to
nfs
 To: Jo Goossens <jo.goossens at hosted-power.com> <mailto:jo.goossens
at hosted-power.com> ; gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:gluster-users
at gluster.org> ;
 CC: Ambarish Soman <asoman at redhat.com> <mailto:asoman at
redhat.com> ; Karan Sandha <ksandha at redhat.com> <mailto:ksandha
at redhat.com> ;
 + Ambarish
 
 On 07/11/2017 02:31 PM, Jo Goossens wrote:
 > Hello,
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > We tried tons of settings to get a php app running on a native gluster
 > mount:
 >
 >
 >
 > e.g.: 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www glusterfs
 >
defaults,_netdev,backup-volfile-servers=192.168.140.42:192.168.140.43,direct-io-mode=disable
 > 0 0
 >
 >
 >
 > I tried some mount variants in order to speed up things without luck.
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > After that I tried nfs (native gluster nfs 3 and ganesha nfs 4), it was
 > a crazy performance difference.
 >
 >
 >
 > e.g.: 192.168.140.41:/www /var/www nfs4 defaults,_netdev 0 0
 >
 >
 >
 > I tried a test like this to confirm the slowness:
 >
 >
 >
 > ./smallfile_cli.py ?--top /var/www/test --host-set 192.168.140.41
 > --threads 8 --files 5000 --file-size 64 --record-size 64
 >
 > This test finished in around 1.5 seconds with NFS and in more than 250
 > seconds without nfs (can't remember exact numbers, but I reproduced it
 > several times for both).
 >
 > With the native gluster mount the php app had loading times of over 10
 > seconds, with the nfs mount the php app loaded around 1 second maximum
 > and even less. (reproduced several times)
 >
 >
 >
 > I tried all kind of performance settings and variants of this but not
 > helped , the difference stayed huge, here are some of the settings
 > played with in random order:
 >
 
 Request Ambarish & Karan (cc'ed who have been working on evaluating 
 performance of various access protocols gluster supports) to look at the 
 below settings and provide inputs.
 
 Thanks,
 Soumya
 
 >
 >
 > gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation on
 > gluster volume set www features.cache-invalidation-timeout 600
 > gluster volume set www performance.stat-prefetch on
 > gluster volume set www performance.cache-samba-metadata on
 > gluster volume set www performance.cache-invalidation on
 > gluster volume set www performance.md-cache-timeout 600
 > gluster volume set www network.inode-lru-limit 250000
 >
 > gluster volume set www performance.cache-refresh-timeout 60
 > gluster volume set www performance.read-ahead disable
 > gluster volume set www performance.readdir-ahead on
 > gluster volume set www performance.parallel-readdir on
 > gluster volume set www performance.write-behind-window-size 4MB
 > gluster volume set www performance.io-thread-count 64
 >
 > gluster volume set www performance.client-io-threads on
 >
 > gluster volume set www performance.cache-size 1GB
 > gluster volume set www performance.quick-read on
 > gluster volume set www performance.flush-behind on
 > gluster volume set www performance.write-behind on
 > gluster volume set www nfs.disable on
 >
 > gluster volume set www client.event-threads 3
 > gluster volume set www server.event-threads 3
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > The NFS ha adds a lot of complexity which we wouldn't need at all in
our
 > setup, could you please explain what is going on here? Is NFS the only
 > solution to get acceptable performance? Did I miss one crucial settting
 > perhaps?
 >
 >
 >
 > We're really desperate, thanks a lot for your help!
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > PS: We tried with gluster 3.11 and 3.8 on Debian, both had terrible
 > performance when not used with nfs.
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > Kind regards
 >
 > Jo Goossens
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Gluster-users mailing list
 > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> 
 > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
<http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>
 >
 
 


 _______________________________________________  Gluster-users mailing list 
Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>  
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
<http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>

 
 


_______________________________________________  Gluster-users mailing list 
Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org>  
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
<http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>

 
 
 


_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> 
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
<http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users>

 
 


_______________________________________________
 Gluster-users mailing list
 Gluster-users at gluster.org
 http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170711/c443aad4/attachment.html>

Reasonably Related Threads

Search for more reasonably related threads

Gluster users - Jul 2017 - Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

[Gluster-users] Gluster native mount is really slow compared to nfs

Reasonably Related Threads