search for: jmliger

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 11:19:07PM +0100, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote: > I'm trying to rebuild the libguestfs RHEL 7.2/7.3 preview packages into my personnal COPR CentOS 7 repository, which already contains upstream virtualisation packages : > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ > > For RHEL 7.2 libguestfs-1.28.1-1.55.el7.src.rpm, I'm missing ocaml >= 4.01.0-22.5 which isn't provided as src.rpm : > https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jmliger/virt7-upstream/epel-7-x86_64/00131871-libguestfs/root.log.gz I've uploaded the...

...rt for the xl (modern Xen) toolstack? I tried to build libvirt from the SRPM, which succeeded, however, without the mentioned Xen parts. I have also found two repos from people who provide upstream libvirt builds for CentOS 7, again, without the Xen parts. - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ and - https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:aevseev/libvirt Within the CentOS virtualization SIG builds for Xen there is a 1.3.x build of libvirt that includes support for the modern Xen toolstack. Would it be possible to inline this into the upstream to enable building it...

...ibvirt-1.2.17-3.el7.src.rpm >> >> I personally rebuild libvirt from last official releases which enable >> ceph by default for el7 : >> http://libvirt.org/sources/ >> >> My dogfooding tests still **can be found here : >> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ >> >>> The next question is, is there a difference between the generic rbd and >>> building against ceph-devel. (As in, is one ceph only and the other >>> generic only or can you use both when built against ceph-devel, etc) >>> >>>...

...olstack? > > I tried to build libvirt from the SRPM, which succeeded, however, without > the mentioned Xen parts. > I have also found two repos from people who provide upstream libvirt builds > for CentOS 7, again, without the Xen parts. > - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ and > - https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:aevseev/libvirt > > Within the CentOS virtualization SIG builds for Xen there is a 1.3.x build > of libvirt that includes support for the modern Xen toolstack. > Would it be possible to inline this into the upstrea...

...tp://people.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs-RHEL-7.2-preview/libvirt-1.2.17-3.el7.src.rpm I personally rebuild libvirt from last official releases which enable ceph by default for el7 : http://libvirt.org/sources/ My dogfooding tests still **can be found here : https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ > The next question is, is there a difference between the generic rbd and > building against ceph-devel. (As in, is one ceph only and the other > generic only or can you use both when built against ceph-devel, etc) > > Since qemu-kvm-ev enables ceph, if we can also...

Obviously due to the heavy development, the packages in RHEL7 (even 7.2) lack tons of things. I'm specifically interested in virt-builder and wondering if there's a preview repo that I'm not aware of. ...?

...rt for the xl (modern Xen) toolstack? I tried to build libvirt from the SRPM, which succeeded, however, without the mentioned Xen parts. I have also found two repos from people who provide upstream libvirt builds for CentOS 7, again, without the Xen parts. - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ and - https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:aevseev/libvirt Within the CentOS virtualization SIG builds for Xen there is a 1.3.x build of libvirt that includes support for the modern Xen toolstack. Would it be possible to inline this into the upstream to enable building it...

Hi, You can find some upstream packages I've built for EL7. My testing purposes are only about KVM and Ceph but there is also a Xen package you feel free to play with. https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ Regards, Jean-Marc

...t; I tried to build libvirt from the SRPM, which succeeded, however, without >> the mentioned Xen parts. >> I have also found two repos from people who provide upstream libvirt builds >> for CentOS 7, again, without the Xen parts. >> - https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ and >> - https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:aevseev/libvirt >> >> Within the CentOS virtualization SIG builds for Xen there is a 1.3.x build >> of libvirt that includes support for the modern Xen toolstack. >> Would it be possible to inline th...

Hi, If you are interested in giving some testing, I've rebuilt from Fedora the last Mesa stack with VirGL 3D and others drivers enabled. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ Regards, Jean-Marc Liger

...also upgraded noVNC 1.0.0. Unfortunatly the QEMUExtendedKeyEvent which fixes French keyboard's detection doesn't work for me at the moment. But maybe, the problem is located in my QEMU 2.11.0 implementation. If someone want to digg his own way ? https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/builds/ *Jean-Marc LIGER Ing?nieur Syst?mes et R?seaux de Communication * FACULT? DE M?DECINE Direction Technique, Informatique, R?seaux et Multim?dia 15 rue de l??cole de M?decine ? 75270 Paris cedex 06 T?l : +33 (0)1 76 53 00 71 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML att...

Just wondering if there is a way to get the gnome rebase stuff for gnome 3.8 to 3.16 now? (heard it was coming in 7.2) I'm playing with centos 7.1 and would like to use gnome 3.16. is there a way to start playing with that now? Thanks jerry

On 31.07.2015 10:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758 > Have you checked 3.5.4 RC or CentOS Virt SIG[2] > to see if the bug has been fixed in latest qemu-kvm-ev ? > > [1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/ > [2] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-testing/x86_64/os/ Patch mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff

Hi, I see that for EL6 gwd already has pushed a libvirtd package with version 1.2.10[1]. I got request from VDSM development to provide libvirt >= 1.2.9 for EL7 for oVirt 3.6. gwd, do you just rebuilt http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=594825 ? I'm looking at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=628689 may this work for you? [1]

Hi Lucian, It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and with_libxl enabled. http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1348 Regards, Jean-Marc Le 28/10/2015 09:38, Nux! a ?crit : > Pasi, > > Where are these RPMs, how are they built, what exactly are the differences vs the stock ones? > > Regards, > Lucian > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant

...bguestfs-RHEL-7.2-preview/libvirt-1.2.17-3.el7.src.rpm > > I personally rebuild libvirt from last official releases which enable > ceph by default for el7 : > http://libvirt.org/sources/ > > My dogfooding tests still **can be found here : > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ > >> The next question is, is there a difference between the generic rbd and >> building against ceph-devel. (As in, is one ceph only and the other >> generic only or can you use both when built against ceph-devel, etc) >> >> Since qemu-kvm-ev enabl...

...7.3 is now > 2.0.0, > libvirt from Xen has to be rebuild to upgrade the new libvirt 2.0.0 > > See my previous post : > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2016-November/005255.html > > I've done it for my own repo : > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ > > Regards, > Jean-Marc > > Le 30/12/2016 ? 17:56, Francis The Metman a ?crit : > > PJ > > My server is critical to me, but not the public, fortunately. > > I can take it down as I suggested, but am a bit reluctant to do so > > until I have...

...Xen is 1.3.0 and libvirt from CentOS 7.3 is now 2.0.0, libvirt from Xen has to be rebuild to upgrade the new libvirt 2.0.0 See my previous post : https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2016-November/005255.html I've done it for my own repo : https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ Regards, Jean-Marc Le 30/12/2016 ? 17:56, Francis The Metman a ?crit : > PJ > My server is critical to me, but not the public, fortunately. > I can take it down as I suggested, but am a bit reluctant to do so until I have heard more opinions. > Presumably your system u...

...t;> libvirt from Xen has to be rebuild to upgrade the new libvirt 2.0.0 >> >> See my previous post : >> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2016-November/005255.html >> >> I've done it for my own repo : >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/ >> >> Regards, >> Jean-Marc >> >> Le 30/12/2016 ? 17:56, Francis The Metman a ?crit : >>> PJ >>> My server is critical to me, but not the public, fortunately. >>> I can take it down as I suggested, but am a bit reluctant to do...

PJ My server is critical to me, but not the public, fortunately. I can take it down as I suggested, but am a bit reluctant to do so until I have heard more opinions. Presumably your system update failed using your script, so it will probably fail for me if I copy it. I will keep a copy anyway. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "PJ Welsh" <pjwelsh at gmail.com> > To: